Literature DB >> 30892889

Ruthenium-Catalyzed Redox Isomerizations inside Living Cells.

Cristian Vidal1, María Tomás-Gamasa1, Alejandro Gutiérrez-González1, José L Mascareñas1.   

Abstract

Tailored ruthenium(IV) complexes can catalyze the isomerization of allylic alcohols into saturated carbonyl derivatives under physiologically relevant conditions, and even inside living mammalian cells. The reaction, which involves ruthenium-hydride intermediates, is bioorthogonal and biocompatible, and can be used for the "in cellulo" generation of fluorescent and bioactive probes. Overall, our research reveals a novel metal-based tool for cellular intervention, and comes to further demonstrate the compatibility of organometallic mechanisms with the complex environment of cells.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30892889      PMCID: PMC6497367          DOI: 10.1021/jacs.9b00837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


Enzymes catalyze a myriad of chemical transformations that are essential to life, including hydrolysis, ligations, isomerizations or redox processes.[1] Chemists are not constrained to generate life-sustaining reactions, and along the years have invented many catalytic processes that do not occur in nature. Especially appealing are those transformations involving metal catalysis.[2] While these reactions are less efficient than those promoted by enzymes, they present a broader scope, and are more versatile and mechanistically diverse. Therefore, exporting the power of “non-natural” metal catalysis to the biological arena might open unforeseen opportunities for metabolic or genetic intervention, and unveil new tools in therapy and diagnosis. Unfortunately, most transition metal-catalyzed processes occur under conditions that are not compatible with aqueous and biological settings, and therefore, performing these reactions under physiological environments is certainly challenging. Nonetheless, along recent years several groups have demonstrated the viability of promoting bioorthogonal metal-mediated reactions in biological buffers, and even in living settings.[3] While the area is yet in its infancy, there have been reports on biocompatible metal-promoted deprotections (Pd, Ru),[4] click-like annulations (Cu or Ru),[5] cross-couplings (Pd),[6,4b,4i] and even gold-promoted carbocyclizations.[7] Sadler and Do have independently reported the use of osmium or iridium complexes to alter NADH/NAD+ cellular equilibriums, or promote reductions of specific aldehydes or ketones (Figure a).[8] Albeit the efficiency of these processes was low, these studies suggest that metal-hydride species can be generated inside cells. In light of these observations, and considering previous contributions by Gimeno and co-workers on a ruthenium-mediated isomerization of allylic alcohols to ketones in water,[9] we questioned whether this type of redox-neutral processes, which likely involve ruthenium hydride species, could be achieved in biorelevant media or even in intracellular settings. Do the ruthenium intermediates survive to the stringent conditions of a complex biological buffer or a living cell? Are the hydride intermediates compatible with biological components? Can this “non-natural” metal catalysis promote biological responses?
Figure 1

(a) Transfer hydrogenations have been developed to either alter the redox status of cells or to reduce abiotic substrates; (b) this work, and ruthenium-hydride intermediates that are likely involved in the reaction.

(a) Transfer hydrogenations have been developed to either alter the redox status of cells or to reduce abiotic substrates; (b) this work, and ruthenium-hydride intermediates that are likely involved in the reaction. Herein we provide some answers to these questions, by reporting the first metal-catalyzed isomerization reaction that can be carried out under biological conditions, and more importantly, in the interior of living mammalian cells (Figure b). The reaction is promoted by a ruthenium(IV) catalyst that combines water solubility with some lipophilicity. The redox-neutral isomerization allows to transform nonfunctional, abiotic allyl alcohols into fluorescent or bioactive ketones, in the interior of living mammalian cells. The viability of the isomerization was first explored using 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol (1a) as substrate, and the bis-allyl Ru(IV) complex [Ru] as catalyst (Table and S1).[10] The reaction is very efficient in water and PBS at physiological temperatures (37 °C), even using only 1 mol % of the metal complex (92%, 1.5 h). More importantly, the transformation can be efficiently accomplished in complex cell culture media, such as DMEM (Dubelcco’s modified Eagle’s medium), and even in cell lysates (using 5 mol % of catalyst).
Table 1

Scope of the Ruthenium Catalyzed Isomerization of Allylic Alcoholsa

Performed using 1 (0.2 mmol), milieu (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %).

[Ru] (5 mol %).

[Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL.

Milieu with 20% THF.

Performed using 1 (0.2 mmol), milieu (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL. Milieu with 20% THF. The efficiency and orthogonality of the reaction can be replicated with other substrates containing modified aryl or naphthyl substituents to give the expected ketones (Table , 2a–d and 2f–g, respectively), as well as with aliphatic derivatives (Table , product 2e). Other ruthenium catalysts like [RuCp*Cl(COD)], [RuCp(MeCN)3][PF6] or [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 do work in water, but perform very poorly in cell lysates. We also tested the iridium complex employed by Do and co-workers for the reduction of carbonyl compounds, as well as [IrCl2Cp*]2,[11] but isomerization yields were very low (Table S1). Therefore, complex [Ru] seems to present the best balance between reactivity and stability, when used in biologically relevant media. While the mechanism of the reaction has not been fully elucidated,[12,9a,9b] it likely involves an initial aquation of the precatalyst, followed by coordination of the allylic alcohol to the ruthenium center and β-hydrogen elimination to generate hydride intermediate of type I (Figure b). An intramolecular hydride transfer produces an oxo complex (type II) that releases the product and regenerates the Ru(IV) catalyst. The presence of ruthenium hydride intermediates was confirmed by deuteration experiments (Section S5), which demonstrated that they survive under stringent conditions of a milieu like DMEM. The high catalytic activity and orthogonality of the ruthenium complex [Ru] under biologically relevant conditions, prompted us to evaluate the viability of performing the reaction in native cellular settings. This required a way of monitoring the process, and therefore we designed the substrate 1g, which displays very low fluorescence above 500 nm when excited at 385 nm. However, the isomeric ketone product 2g is highly emissive at the same wavelength of excitation (Figures S1–S3). The intracellular reactions were explored in human (A549 and HeLa), and animal (Vero) cell lines. Confocal microscopy of live cells treated as indicated in the caption of Figure c, revealed that there is a considerable intracellular buildup of green fluorescence after 1 h, mainly located in the cytosol, even using only 10 μM of [Ru] and 100 μM of substrate (Figure b, panel B). Considering the mean value of corrected total cell fluorescence (CTCF) there is an increase of up to 38-fold in the emission of cells treated with 1g, when they had been previously preincubated with the ruthenium complex (Figure c). Control experiments of untreated cells confirmed that such increase is a consequence of the intracellular formation of the product. Similar results were obtained with A549 and Vero cells (Figures S6 and S7).
Figure 2

Reactivity of ruthenium complex in living cells. (a) Ruthenium catalyzed isomerization of allylic alcohol 1g; (b) Fluorescence micrographies of HeLa cells (confocal): (A) cells incubated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (B) cells incubated with [Ru], washed and treated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (C) cells incubated with product 2g (brightfield and green channel); (c) CTFC measurements in HeLa, Vero and A549 cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated with [Ru] (10 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 1 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments. λex = 385 nm, λem = 520–700 nm. Scale bar: 12.5 μm.

Reactivity of ruthenium complex in living cells. (a) Ruthenium catalyzed isomerization of allylic alcohol 1g; (b) Fluorescence micrographies of HeLa cells (confocal): (A) cells incubated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (B) cells incubated with [Ru], washed and treated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (C) cells incubated with product 2g (brightfield and green channel); (c) CTFC measurements in HeLa, Vero and A549 cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated with [Ru] (10 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 1 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments. λex = 385 nm, λem = 520–700 nm. Scale bar: 12.5 μm. The formation of the expected product 2g was further confirmed by LC-MS analysis of methanolic extracts of the cells after running the reaction for 6 h, and 2-fold washing with DMEM and PBS. The amount of product in the washings was low; however, the methanolic extracts contained a significant amount of ketone 2g.[13] Importantly, using LC-MS techniques, and appropriate calibration curves, we could also quantify the product generated inside cells (Figure a and Figure S11). The formation of the product 2g increases with time, which demonstrates the persistence of a reactive metal complex inside the cells. ICP-MS analysis of cellular extracts obtained after exposing HeLa cells to 10 or 25 μM of [Ru], and thoroughly washed with DMEM, revealed a ruthenium content of 3.5 or 11.1 ng/106 cells, respectively (Figure b), while untreated cells contain over 0.2 ng/106 cells (Figure S10). Combining this information with the amount of intracellular product, it is possible to calculate turnover numbers (TON) with a relatively good accuracy (Figure b). Indeed, we found a turnover of over 22 in experiments with cells treated with 10 μM of [Ru] and 100 μM of substrate, after 6 h (Section S12). To our knowledge this represents the first quantitative demonstration of turnover in an organometallic intracellular reaction.
Figure 3

(a) Extracted ion chromatogram of the product 2g generated intracellularly (methanolic extract). HeLa cells pretreated with 10 μM of [Ru] for 50 min were washed twice and incubated with 100 μM of substrate 1g for 30 min/6 h; (b) turnover numbers of intracellular catalysis at 10 and 25 μM of catalyst loading (the quantification was performed considering the total crude material after methanolic extract and two washing steps (DMEM and PBS)); (inset) ICP-MS values of the intracellular accumulation of ruthenium after incubation of cells in DMEM with 10 or 25 μM (in DMSO) for 50 min, double washing with PBS and digestion with HNO3; (c) cytotoxicity studies in HeLa cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated with either substrate 1g (100 μM) or product 2g (100 μM) for 6/24 h. Alternatively, cells were mixed with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, washed twice with DMEM and treated with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 6/24 h (labeled as intracellular reaction). Right bar: cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and the toxicity checked after 24 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments.

(a) Extracted ion chromatogram of the product 2g generated intracellularly (methanolic extract). HeLa cells pretreated with 10 μM of [Ru] for 50 min were washed twice and incubated with 100 μM of substrate 1g for 30 min/6 h; (b) turnover numbers of intracellular catalysis at 10 and 25 μM of catalyst loading (the quantification was performed considering the total crude material after methanolic extract and two washing steps (DMEM and PBS)); (inset) ICP-MS values of the intracellular accumulation of ruthenium after incubation of cells in DMEM with 10 or 25 μM (in DMSO) for 50 min, double washing with PBS and digestion with HNO3; (c) cytotoxicity studies in HeLa cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated with either substrate 1g (100 μM) or product 2g (100 μM) for 6/24 h. Alternatively, cells were mixed with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, washed twice with DMEM and treated with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 6/24 h (labeled as intracellular reaction). Right bar: cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and the toxicity checked after 24 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments. While the above data demonstrate the viability of achieving ruthenium-mediated isomerizations in native intracellular settings, an important challenge in this nascent scientific field of cellular metallocatalysis consists of the intracellular generation of active products.[14] Up to now, these studies have been essentially restricted to uncaging reactions from appropriately protected precursors. We therefore wondered whether the isomerization reaction could also be associated with changes in some biological activity. Using standard MTT techniques, we confirmed that using concentrations up to 100 μM, neither the ruthenium complex nor the substrate 1g or product 2g presented noticeable toxicities after 6 h (Figure c). However, after 24 h, we observed toxicity in the case of the product (32% of cell death, Figure S4). In order to study the effect of the “in cellulo” generation of the product 2g, we added 100 μM of the substrate 1g to cells that had been treated with 50 μM of [Ru], and thoroughly washed with DMEM. In this case, we observed a higher decrease in viability (Figure c, 45% of death after 24 h). This response is also noticeable even after only 6 h, when more than 30% of the cells died, 30 times more than that observed with the substrate (Figure c). Given than the complex [Ru] is not toxic at such concentration (Figure S5), these results suggest that the intracellular generation of the product produces a more effective biological response than its external addition. Finally, considering the well-known Michael type of reactivity of α,β-unsaturated systems, especially for thiol nucleophiles, we envisioned the use of our ruthenium-mediated isomerization to generate glutathione (GSH) depleting agents. We first confirmed that the ruthenium catalyst can efficiently convert diallyl alcohols of type 3 into the corresponding α,β-unsaturated ketones 4, even in cell lysates (Figure a). In a preliminary screening with HeLa cells, we could observe that some of these ketones, like 4b, promoted around 20% consumption of GSH. We therefore carried out a standard isomerization experiment in living cells using 50 μM of [Ru] and 100 μM of 3b. Analysis of the level of GSH after 6 h confirmed a substantial decrease of the intracellular GSH concentration (over 40% consumption of GSH, average of three experiments, Figure b). Given that the catalyst and the substrate do not alter the levels of GSH, the observed changes must arise from the in situ generation of the product. While these biological results should be viewed as a preliminary proof of concept, they demonstrate that the potential of metal catalysis to generate bioactive products inside cells is not limited to standard uncaging reactions.
Figure 4

Generation of α,β-unsaturated ketones. (a) Scope of the ruthenium-catalyzed isomerization. Performed using 3 (0.2 mmol), solvent (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL. (b) Selected biological studies of GSH consumption using the transformation 3b→4b as a model. Reaction conditions: for intracellular catalysis, cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 3b (100 μM), for 6 h. For control experiments, cells were incubated with substrate 3b or product 4b (100 μM) for 6 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments.

Generation of α,β-unsaturated ketones. (a) Scope of the ruthenium-catalyzed isomerization. Performed using 3 (0.2 mmol), solvent (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL. (b) Selected biological studies of GSH consumption using the transformation 3b→4b as a model. Reaction conditions: for intracellular catalysis, cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 3b (100 μM), for 6 h. For control experiments, cells were incubated with substrate 3b or product 4b (100 μM) for 6 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent experiments. In summary, we have developed the first metal-catalyzed isomerization reaction that can be achieved inside living cells. The reaction, promoted by a Ru(IV) complex, involves an intramolecular hydride-transfer process and takes place with a remarkable intracellular turnover. Our results demonstrate that typical intermediates of catalytic organometallic reactions, including ruthenium-hydride complexes, can survive the crowded atmosphere of cell lysates or even living cells. Importantly, the substrates can be engineered for the “in cellulo” generation of fluorescent products or bioactive molecules. Overall, these results open new avenues in this emerging research field at the boundary of metal catalysis and cellular biology, and promises to yield important applications in biomedicine.
  38 in total

Review 1.  How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations.

Authors:  Mireia Garcia-Viloca; Jiali Gao; Martin Karplus; Donald G Truhlar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Allylic alcohols as synthetic enolate equivalents: isomerisation and tandem reactions catalysed by transition metal complexes.

Authors:  Nanna Ahlsten; Agnieszka Bartoszewicz; Belén Martín-Matute
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 4.390

3.  Ruthenium-induced allylcarbamate cleavage in living cells.

Authors:  Craig Streu; Eric Meggers
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Bis(allyl)-ruthenium(IV) complexes as highly efficient catalysts for the redox isomerization of allylic alcohols into carbonyl compounds in organic and aqueous media: scope, limitations, and theoretical analysis of the mechanism.

Authors:  Victorio Cadierno; Sergio E García-Garrido; José Gimeno; Adrián Varela-Alvarez; José A Sordo
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Progress towards bioorthogonal catalysis with organometallic compounds.

Authors:  Timo Völker; Felix Dempwolff; Peter L Graumann; Eric Meggers
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 6.  Transition metal-mediated bioorthogonal protein chemistry in living cells.

Authors:  Maiyun Yang; Jie Li; Peng R Chen
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2014-09-21       Impact factor: 54.564

7.  Palladium-mediated intracellular chemistry.

Authors:  Rahimi M Yusop; Asier Unciti-Broceta; Emma M V Johansson; Rosario M Sánchez-Martín; Mark Bradley
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 24.427

Review 8.  Metal complex catalysis in living biological systems.

Authors:  Pijus K Sasmal; Craig N Streu; Eric Meggers
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 6.222

9.  Extracellular palladium-catalysed dealkylation of 5-fluoro-1-propargyl-uracil as a bioorthogonally activated prodrug approach.

Authors:  Jason T Weiss; John C Dawson; Kenneth G Macleod; Witold Rybski; Craig Fraser; Carmen Torres-Sánchez; E Elizabeth Patton; Mark Bradley; Neil O Carragher; Asier Unciti-Broceta
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Development and bioorthogonal activation of palladium-labile prodrugs of gemcitabine.

Authors:  Jason T Weiss; John C Dawson; Craig Fraser; Witold Rybski; Carmen Torres-Sánchez; Mark Bradley; E Elizabeth Patton; Neil O Carragher; Asier Unciti-Broceta
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 7.446

View more
  11 in total

1.  Developing bioorthogonal probes to span a spectrum of reactivities.

Authors:  Sean S Nguyen; Jennifer A Prescher
Journal:  Nat Rev Chem       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 34.035

Review 2.  Interfacing non-enzymatic catalysis with living microorganisms.

Authors:  Joanna C Sadler; Jonathan A Dennis; Nick W Johnson; Stephen Wallace
Journal:  RSC Chem Biol       Date:  2021-06-04

Review 3.  Organometallic catalysis in aqueous and biological environments: harnessing the power of metal carbenes.

Authors:  Sara Gutiérrez; María Tomás-Gamasa; José Luis Mascareñas
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 9.969

4.  Intracellular Activation of Anticancer Therapeutics Using Polymeric Bioorthogonal Nanocatalysts.

Authors:  Xianzhi Zhang; Ryan F Landis; Puspam Keshri; Roberto Cao-Milán; David C Luther; Sanjana Gopalakrishnan; Yuanchang Liu; Rui Huang; Gengtan Li; Morgane Malassiné; Imad Uddin; Brayan Rondon; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 5.  In situ activation of therapeutics through bioorthogonal catalysis.

Authors:  Wenjie Wang; Xianzhi Zhang; Rui Huang; Cristina-Maria Hirschbiegel; Huaisong Wang; Ya Ding; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 17.873

6.  Tracking Reactions of Asymmetric Organo-Osmium Transfer Hydrogenation Catalysts in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Bolitho; James P C Coverdale; Hannah E Bridgewater; Guy J Clarkson; Paul D Quinn; Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Peter J Sadler
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 15.336

7.  Homologation of aryl ketones to long-chain ketones and aldehydes via C-C bond cleavage.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Ling-Jun Li; Zhen-Yu Wang; Hui Xu; Hui-Xiong Dai
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-06-02

8.  Highlights from the 55th Bürgenstock Conference on Stereochemistry 2022.

Authors:  Alexis Archambeau; Martina Delbianco
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 9.969

9.  Intracellular Ruthenium-Promoted (2+2+2) Cycloadditions.

Authors:  Joan Miguel-Ávila; María Tomás-Gamasa; José L Mascareñas
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 16.823

10.  Bioorthogonal Azide-Thioalkyne Cycloaddition Catalyzed by Photoactivatable Ruthenium(II) Complexes.

Authors:  Alejandro Gutiérrez-González; Paolo Destito; José R Couceiro; Cibran Pérez-González; Fernando López; José L Mascareñas
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 16.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.