Tailored ruthenium(IV) complexes can catalyze the isomerization of allylic alcohols into saturated carbonyl derivatives under physiologically relevant conditions, and even inside living mammalian cells. The reaction, which involves ruthenium-hydride intermediates, is bioorthogonal and biocompatible, and can be used for the "in cellulo" generation of fluorescent and bioactive probes. Overall, our research reveals a novel metal-based tool for cellular intervention, and comes to further demonstrate the compatibility of organometallic mechanisms with the complex environment of cells.
Tailored ruthenium(IV)complexes can catalyze the isomerization of allylic alcohols into saturated carbonyl derivatives under physiologically relevant conditions, and even inside living mammalian cells. The reaction, which involves ruthenium-hydride intermediates, is bioorthogonal and biocompatible, and can be used for the "in cellulo" generation of fluorescent and bioactive probes. Overall, our research reveals a novel metal-based tool for cellular intervention, and comes to further demonstrate the compatibility of organometallic mechanisms with the complex environment of cells.
Enzymes catalyze a myriad of
chemical transformations that are essential to life, including hydrolysis,
ligations, isomerizations or redox processes.[1] Chemists are not constrained to generate life-sustaining reactions,
and along the years have invented many catalytic processes that do
not occur in nature. Especially appealing are those transformations
involving metal catalysis.[2] While these
reactions are less efficient than those promoted by enzymes, they
present a broader scope, and are more versatile and mechanistically
diverse. Therefore, exporting the power of “non-natural”
metal catalysis to the biological arena might open unforeseen opportunities
for metabolic or genetic intervention, and unveil new tools in therapy
and diagnosis.Unfortunately, most transition metal-catalyzed
processes occur
under conditions that are not compatible with aqueous and biological
settings, and therefore, performing these reactions under physiological
environments is certainly challenging. Nonetheless, along recent years
several groups have demonstrated the viability of promoting bioorthogonal
metal-mediated reactions in biological buffers, and even in living
settings.[3] While the area is yet in its
infancy, there have been reports on biocompatible metal-promoted deprotections
(Pd, Ru),[4] click-like annulations (Cu or
Ru),[5] cross-couplings (Pd),[6,4b,4i] and even gold-promoted carbocyclizations.[7]Sadler and Do have independently reported
the use of osmium or
iridiumcomplexes to alter NADH/NAD+ cellular equilibriums,
or promote reductions of specific aldehydes or ketones (Figure a).[8] Albeit the efficiency of these processes was low, these studies
suggest that metal-hydride species can be generated inside cells.
In light of these observations, and considering previous contributions
by Gimeno and co-workers on a ruthenium-mediated isomerization of
allylic alcohols to ketones in water,[9] we
questioned whether this type of redox-neutral processes, which likely
involve ruthenium hydride species, could be achieved in biorelevant
media or even in intracellular settings. Do the ruthenium intermediates
survive to the stringent conditions of a complex biological buffer
or a living cell? Are the hydride intermediates compatible with biological
components? Can this “non-natural” metal catalysis promote
biological responses?
Figure 1
(a) Transfer hydrogenations have been developed to either
alter
the redox status of cells or to reduce abiotic substrates; (b) this
work, and ruthenium-hydride intermediates that are likely involved
in the reaction.
(a) Transfer hydrogenations have been developed to either
alter
the redox status of cells or to reduce abiotic substrates; (b) this
work, and ruthenium-hydride intermediates that are likely involved
in the reaction.Herein we provide some
answers to these questions, by reporting
the first metal-catalyzed isomerization reaction that can be carried
out under biological conditions, and more importantly, in the interior
of living mammalian cells (Figure b). The reaction is promoted by a ruthenium(IV) catalyst
that combines water solubility with some lipophilicity. The redox-neutral
isomerization allows to transform nonfunctional, abiotic allyl alcohols
into fluorescent or bioactive ketones, in the interior of living mammalian
cells.The viability of the isomerization was first explored
using 1-phenylprop-2-en-1-ol
(1a) as substrate, and the bis-allyl Ru(IV) complex [Ru] as catalyst (Table and S1).[10] The reaction is very efficient in water and PBS at physiological
temperatures (37 °C), even using only 1 mol % of the metal complex
(92%, 1.5 h). More importantly, the transformation can be efficiently
accomplished in complex cell culture media, such as DMEM (Dubelcco’s
modified Eagle’s medium), and even in cell lysates (using 5
mol % of catalyst).
Table 1
Scope of the Ruthenium
Catalyzed Isomerization
of Allylic Alcoholsa
Performed using 1 (0.2
mmol), milieu (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %).
[Ru] (5 mol %).
[Ru] (5 mol %), cells
lysates 7 mg/mL.
Milieu
with 20% THF.
Performed using 1 (0.2
mmol), milieu (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %).[Ru] (5 mol %).[Ru] (5 mol %), cells
lysates 7 mg/mL.Milieu
with 20% THF.The efficiency
and orthogonality of the reaction can be replicated
with other substrates containing modified aryl or naphthyl substituents
to give the expected ketones (Table , 2a–d and 2f–g, respectively), as well as with aliphatic
derivatives (Table , product 2e). Other ruthenium catalysts like [RuCp*Cl(COD)],
[RuCp(MeCN)3][PF6] or [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 do work in water, but perform very
poorly in cell lysates. We also tested the iridium complex employed
by Do and co-workers for the reduction of carbonyl compounds, as well
as [IrCl2Cp*]2,[11] but isomerization yields were very low (Table S1). Therefore, complex [Ru] seems to present
the best balance between reactivity and stability, when used in biologically
relevant media.While the mechanism of the reaction has not
been fully elucidated,[12,9a,9b] it likely involves an initial
aquation of the precatalyst, followed by coordination of the allylic
alcohol to the ruthenium center and β-hydrogen elimination to
generate hydride intermediate of type I (Figure b). An intramolecular hydride
transfer produces an oxo complex (type II) that releases
the product and regenerates the Ru(IV) catalyst.The presence
of ruthenium hydride intermediates was confirmed by
deuteration experiments (Section S5), which
demonstrated that they survive under stringent conditions of a milieu
like DMEM. The high catalytic activity and orthogonality of the ruthenium
complex [Ru] under biologically relevant conditions,
prompted us to evaluate the viability of performing the reaction in
native cellular settings. This required a way of monitoring the process,
and therefore we designed the substrate 1g, which displays
very low fluorescence above 500 nm when excited at 385 nm. However,
the isomeric ketone product 2g is highly emissive at
the same wavelength of excitation (Figures S1–S3).The intracellular reactions were explored in human (A549
and HeLa),
and animal (Vero) cell lines. Confocal microscopy of live cells treated
as indicated in the caption of Figure c, revealed that there is a considerable intracellular
buildup of green fluorescence after 1 h, mainly located in the cytosol,
even using only 10 μM of [Ru] and 100 μM
of substrate (Figure b, panel B). Considering the mean value of corrected total cell fluorescence
(CTCF) there is an increase of up to 38-fold in the emission of cells
treated with 1g, when they had been previously preincubated
with the ruthenium complex (Figure c). Control experiments of untreated cells confirmed
that such increase is a consequence of the intracellular formation
of the product. Similar results were obtained with A549 and Vero cells
(Figures S6 and S7).
Figure 2
Reactivity of ruthenium
complex in living cells. (a) Ruthenium
catalyzed isomerization of allylic alcohol 1g; (b) Fluorescence
micrographies of HeLa cells (confocal): (A) cells incubated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (B) cells incubated with
[Ru], washed and treated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (C) cells incubated with product 2g (brightfield and green channel); (c) CTFC measurements
in HeLa, Vero and A549 cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated
with [Ru] (10 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings
with DMEM and treatment with substrate 1g (100 μM)
for 1 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent
experiments. λex = 385 nm, λem =
520–700 nm. Scale bar: 12.5 μm.
Reactivity of ruthenium
complex in living cells. (a) Ruthenium
catalyzed isomerization of allylic alcohol 1g; (b) Fluorescence
micrographies of HeLa cells (confocal): (A) cells incubated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (B) cells incubated with
[Ru], washed and treated with substrate 1g (brightfield and green channel); (C) cells incubated with product 2g (brightfield and green channel); (c) CTFC measurements
in HeLa, Vero and A549 cells. Reaction conditions: cells were incubated
with [Ru] (10 μM) for 30 min, followed by two washings
with DMEM and treatment with substrate 1g (100 μM)
for 1 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent
experiments. λex = 385 nm, λem =
520–700 nm. Scale bar: 12.5 μm.The formation of the expected product 2g was
further
confirmed by LC-MS analysis of methanolic extracts of the cells after
running the reaction for 6 h, and 2-fold washing with DMEM and PBS.
The amount of product in the washings was low; however, the methanolic
extracts contained a significant amount of ketone 2g.[13] Importantly, using LC-MS techniques, and appropriate
calibration curves, we could also quantify the product generated inside
cells (Figure a and Figure S11). The formation of the product 2g increases with time, which demonstrates the persistence
of a reactive metal complex inside the cells. ICP-MS analysis of cellular
extracts obtained after exposing HeLa cells to 10 or 25 μM of
[Ru], and thoroughly washed with DMEM, revealed a ruthenium
content of 3.5 or 11.1 ng/106 cells, respectively (Figure b), while untreated
cells contain over 0.2 ng/106 cells (Figure S10). Combining this information with the amount of
intracellular product, it is possible to calculate turnover numbers
(TON) with a relatively good accuracy (Figure b). Indeed, we found a turnover of over 22
in experiments with cells treated with 10 μM of [Ru] and 100 μM of substrate, after 6 h (Section S12). To our knowledge this represents the first quantitative
demonstration of turnover in an organometallic intracellular reaction.
Figure 3
(a) Extracted
ion chromatogram of the product 2g generated
intracellularly (methanolic extract). HeLa cells pretreated with 10
μM of [Ru] for 50 min were washed twice and incubated
with 100 μM of substrate 1g for 30 min/6 h; (b)
turnover numbers of intracellular catalysis at 10 and 25 μM
of catalyst loading (the quantification was performed considering
the total crude material after methanolic extract and two washing
steps (DMEM and PBS)); (inset) ICP-MS values of the intracellular
accumulation of ruthenium after incubation of cells in DMEM with 10
or 25 μM (in DMSO) for 50 min, double washing with PBS and digestion
with HNO3; (c) cytotoxicity studies in HeLa cells. Reaction
conditions: cells were incubated with either substrate 1g (100 μM) or product 2g (100 μM) for 6/24
h. Alternatively, cells were mixed with [Ru] (50 μM)
for 30 min, washed twice with DMEM and treated with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 6/24 h (labeled as intracellular reaction).
Right bar: cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM)
for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and the toxicity checked
after 24 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent
experiments.
(a) Extracted
ion chromatogram of the product 2g generated
intracellularly (methanolic extract). HeLa cells pretreated with 10
μM of [Ru] for 50 min were washed twice and incubated
with 100 μM of substrate 1g for 30 min/6 h; (b)
turnover numbers of intracellular catalysis at 10 and 25 μM
of catalyst loading (the quantification was performed considering
the total crude material after methanolic extract and two washing
steps (DMEM and PBS)); (inset) ICP-MS values of the intracellular
accumulation of ruthenium after incubation of cells in DMEM with 10
or 25 μM (in DMSO) for 50 min, double washing with PBS and digestion
with HNO3; (c) cytotoxicity studies in HeLa cells. Reaction
conditions: cells were incubated with either substrate 1g (100 μM) or product 2g (100 μM) for 6/24
h. Alternatively, cells were mixed with [Ru] (50 μM)
for 30 min, washed twice with DMEM and treated with substrate 1g (100 μM) for 6/24 h (labeled as intracellular reaction).
Right bar: cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM)
for 30 min, followed by two washings with DMEM and the toxicity checked
after 24 h. Error bars represent the standard error of three independent
experiments.While the above data
demonstrate the viability of achieving ruthenium-mediated
isomerizations in native intracellular settings, an important challenge
in this nascent scientific field of cellular metallocatalysis consists
of the intracellular generation of active products.[14] Up to now, these studies have been essentially restricted
to uncaging reactions from appropriately protected precursors. We
therefore wondered whether the isomerization reaction could also be
associated with changes in some biological activity. Using standard
MTT techniques, we confirmed that using concentrations up to 100 μM,
neither the ruthenium complex nor the substrate 1g or
product 2g presented noticeable toxicities after 6 h
(Figure c). However,
after 24 h, we observed toxicity in the case of the product (32% of
cell death, Figure S4). In order to study
the effect of the “in cellulo” generation of the product 2g, we added 100 μM of the substrate 1g to cells that had been treated with 50 μM of [Ru], and thoroughly washed with DMEM. In this case, we observed a higher
decrease in viability (Figure c, 45% of death after 24 h). This response is also noticeable
even after only 6 h, when more than 30% of the cells died, 30 times
more than that observed with the substrate (Figure c). Given than the complex [Ru] is not toxic at such concentration (Figure S5), these results suggest that the intracellular generation
of the product produces a more effective biological response than
its external addition.Finally, considering the well-known Michael
type of reactivity
of α,β-unsaturated systems, especially for thiol nucleophiles,
we envisioned the use of our ruthenium-mediated isomerization to generate
glutathione (GSH) depleting agents. We first confirmed that the ruthenium
catalyst can efficiently convert diallylalcohols of type 3 into the corresponding α,β-unsaturated ketones 4, even in cell lysates (Figure a). In a preliminary screening with HeLa
cells, we could observe that some of these ketones, like 4b, promoted around 20% consumption of GSH. We therefore carried out
a standard isomerization experiment in living cells using 50 μM
of [Ru] and 100 μM of 3b. Analysis
of the level of GSH after 6 h confirmed a substantial decrease of
the intracellular GSH concentration (over 40% consumption of GSH,
average of three experiments, Figure b). Given that the catalyst and the substrate do not
alter the levels of GSH, the observed changes must arise from the
in situ generation of the product. While these biological results
should be viewed as a preliminary proof of concept, they demonstrate
that the potential of metal catalysis to generate bioactive products
inside cells is not limited to standard uncaging reactions.
Figure 4
Generation
of α,β-unsaturated ketones. (a) Scope of
the ruthenium-catalyzed isomerization. Performed using 3 (0.2 mmol), solvent (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL. (b) Selected biological studies
of GSH consumption using the transformation 3b→4b as a model. Reaction conditions: for intracellular catalysis,
cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min,
followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 3b (100 μM), for 6 h. For control experiments, cells
were incubated with substrate 3b or product 4b (100 μM) for 6 h. Error bars represent the standard error
of three independent experiments.
Generation
of α,β-unsaturated ketones. (a) Scope of
the ruthenium-catalyzed isomerization. Performed using 3 (0.2 mmol), solvent (1.0 mL) and [Ru] (2 mol %). [Ru] (5 mol %), cells lysates 7 mg/mL. (b) Selected biological studies
of GSH consumption using the transformation 3b→4b as a model. Reaction conditions: for intracellular catalysis,
cells were incubated with [Ru] (50 μM) for 30 min,
followed by two washings with DMEM and treatment with substrate 3b (100 μM), for 6 h. For control experiments, cells
were incubated with substrate 3b or product 4b (100 μM) for 6 h. Error bars represent the standard error
of three independent experiments.In summary, we have developed the first metal-catalyzed isomerization
reaction that can be achieved inside living cells. The reaction, promoted
by a Ru(IV) complex, involves an intramolecular hydride-transfer process
and takes place with a remarkable intracellular turnover. Our results
demonstrate that typical intermediates of catalytic organometallic
reactions, including ruthenium-hydride complexes, can survive the
crowded atmosphere of cell lysates or even living cells. Importantly,
the substrates can be engineered for the “in cellulo”
generation of fluorescent products or bioactive molecules. Overall,
these results open new avenues in this emerging research field at
the boundary of metal catalysis and cellular biology, and promises
to yield important applications in biomedicine.
Authors: Victorio Cadierno; Sergio E García-Garrido; José Gimeno; Adrián Varela-Alvarez; José A Sordo Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Rahimi M Yusop; Asier Unciti-Broceta; Emma M V Johansson; Rosario M Sánchez-Martín; Mark Bradley Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2011-02-06 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Jason T Weiss; John C Dawson; Kenneth G Macleod; Witold Rybski; Craig Fraser; Carmen Torres-Sánchez; E Elizabeth Patton; Mark Bradley; Neil O Carragher; Asier Unciti-Broceta Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2014 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jason T Weiss; John C Dawson; Craig Fraser; Witold Rybski; Carmen Torres-Sánchez; Mark Bradley; E Elizabeth Patton; Neil O Carragher; Asier Unciti-Broceta Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2014-06-12 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Elizabeth M Bolitho; James P C Coverdale; Hannah E Bridgewater; Guy J Clarkson; Paul D Quinn; Carlos Sanchez-Cano; Peter J Sadler Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Alejandro Gutiérrez-González; Paolo Destito; José R Couceiro; Cibran Pérez-González; Fernando López; José L Mascareñas Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-06-16 Impact factor: 16.823