| Literature DB >> 30888488 |
Fulvio Zaccagna1, Frank Riemer2, Andrew N Priest3, Mary A McLean4, Kieren Allinson5, James T Grist2, Carmen Dragos3, Tomasz Matys2, Jonathan H Gillard2, Colin Watts6, Stephen J Price7, Martin J Graves2, Ferdia A Gallagher2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This prospective study evaluated the use of vascular, extracellular and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumours (VERDICT) MRI to investigate the tissue microstructure in glioma. VERDICT-derived parameters were correlated with both histological features and tumour subtype and were also used to explore the peritumoural region.Entities:
Keywords: Brain neoplasms; Cancer; Diagnostic imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Glioma
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30888488 PMCID: PMC6719328 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-6011-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Radiol ISSN: 0938-7994 Impact factor: 5.315
Diffusion MRI parameters for the abbreviated VERDICT model
| ∆/ | Echo time (ms) | | | Number of averages | Acceleration factor | Full readout bandwidth (Hz) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90 | 23.5/4.7 | 49.3 | 49.4 | 8 | 2 | 200,000 |
| 500 | 31.3/12.2 | 64.3 | 41.5 | 8 | 2 | 200,000 |
| 1500 | 43.4/25.8 | 91.4 | 30.1 | 8 | 2 | 200,000 |
| 2000 | 32.1/16.5 | 72.7 | 75.8 | 8 | 2 | 200,000 |
| 3000 | 43.8/24.8 | 89.4 | 43.9 | 8 | 2 | 200,000 |
The following are the parameters used for the shortened protocol: ∆ is the time separation between the gradient pulses, ∂ is the duration of the pulses and |G| is the combined gradient strength of the diffusion encoding
Demographic data and histopathological characteristics for high-grade and low-grade tumours
| Low-grade glioma | High-grade glioma |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age in years | 33.2 ± 9.2 (24–45) | 55.3 ± 11.9 (44–78) | < 0.01 |
| Men, | 2 (28.6) | 4 (57.1) | 0.59 |
| Lesion size in mm | 44.4 ± 19.1 (23.1–68.7) | 27.1 ± 17.2 (6.4–56.4) | 0.13 |
| IDH1 R132Ha, | |||
| Present | 7 (100) | 0 (0) | < 0.01 |
| Absent | 0 (0) | 7 (100) | |
| MIB-1 (a.u.) | 4.2 ± 3.0 (1–8.8) | 19.2 ± 6.7 (12–31) | < 0.001 |
The monoclonal antibody MIB-1 was used to determine the Ki-67 labelling index as a marker of proliferation. Continuous values are expressed as mean ± SD with range in parentheses
aMutations involving isocitrate dehydrogenase 1
Fig. 1a Box and whisker plot illustrating the cell radius as measured by VERDICT MRI and pathology for low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG). b H&E staining from a low-grade glioma shown in Fig. 2. c H&E staining from a high-grade glioma also shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 2a–f Representative images from a low-grade glioma. a Axial post-gadolinium 3D T1-weighted imaging (T1WI). b Intracellular volume fraction. c Cell radius maps. d Axial T2WI. e Extracellular volume fraction. f ADC map, with a scale of × 10−6 mm2/s. Colour maps for b, c, e have been superimposed on the greyscale image from a with the colour scale shown for each image. g–l Representative images from a high-grade glioma. g Axial post-gadolinium 3D T1WI. h Intracellular volume fraction. i Cell radius maps. j Axial T2WI. k Extracellular volume fraction. l ADC map, with a scale of × 10−6 mm2/s. Colour maps for h, i, k have been superimposed on the greyscale image from a with the colour scale shown for each image
Fig. 3Box and whisker plot showing intracellular (IC) volume fraction and extracellular (EC) volume fraction for both low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) derived from the VERDICT MRI model
Fig. 4Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for low-grade glioma (LGG) and high-grade glioma (HGG) as derived from conventional DWI
Comparison between the two observers
| LGG | HGG | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Obs 1 | Obs 2 |
| Obs 1 | Obs 2 |
| |
| Cell radius (μm) | 6.7 ± 1.2 | 6.7 ± 1.5 | 0.53 | 6.8 ± 2.3 | 6.1 ± 2.1 | 1 |
| IC volume fraction | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.13 ± 0.07 | 0.12 ± 0.06 | 0.93 |
| EC volume fraction | 0.92 ± 0.04 | 0.91 ± 0.05 | 0.60 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 0.94 |
Obs observer
The comparison between the VERDICT parameters derived by the analysis performed by the two observers. Values are expressed as median ± SD