Literature DB >> 30888090

Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 min in young healthy adults.

Zsolt Turi1, Gábor Csifcsák2, Nya Mehnwolo Boayue2, Per Aslaksen2, Andrea Antal1,3, Walter Paulus1, Josephine Groot2,4, Guy E Hawkins5, Birte Forstmann4, Alexander Opitz6, Axel Thielscher7,8, Matthias Mittner2.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method that is frequently used to study cortical excitability changes and their impact on cognitive functions in humans. While most stimulators are capable of operating in double-blind mode, the amount of discomfort experienced during tDCS may break blinding. Therefore, specifically designed sham stimulation protocols are being used. The "fade-in, short-stimulation, fade-out" (FSF) protocol has been used in hundreds of studies and is commonly believed to be indistinguishable from real stimulation applied at 1 mA for 20 min. We analysed subjective reports of 192 volunteers, who either received real tDCS (n = 96) or FSF tDCS (n = 96). Participants reported more discomfort for real tDCS and correctly guessed the condition above chance-level. These findings indicate that FSF does not ensure complete blinding and that better active sham protocols are needed.
© 2019 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active sham tDCS; blinding; double-blinding; placebo; transcranial direct current stimulation

Year:  2019        PMID: 30888090     DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  20 in total

1.  Adaptive current tDCS up to 4 mA.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Helen Borges; Bhaskar Paneri; Trynia Kaufman; Electra Nassis; Adantchede L Zannou; Yungjae Shin; Hyeongseob Choi; Seonghoon Kim; Kiwon Lee; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and eating when using a control method that minimizes guessing of the real vs. control condition.

Authors:  Carl E Stevens; Marissa A Lausen; Laura E Wagstaff; Tommy R McRae; Bethany R Pittman; Franklin R Amthor; Mary M Boggiano
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  No effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on visual evoked potential and peak gamma frequency.

Authors:  A Bin Dawood; A Dickinson; A Aytemur; E Milne; M Jones
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 5.  Non-invasive brain stimulation and neuroenhancement.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Bruce Luber; Anna-Katharine Brem; Marom Bikson; Andre R Brunoni; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Veljko Dubljević; Shirley Fecteau; Florinda Ferreri; Agnes Flöel; Mark Hallett; Roy H Hamilton; Christoph S Herrmann; Michal Lavidor; Collen Loo; Caroline Lustenberger; Sergio Machado; Carlo Miniussi; Vera Moliadze; Michael A Nitsche; Simone Rossi; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Margitta Seeck; Gregor Thut; Zsolt Turi; Yoshikazu Ugawa; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian; Nicole Wenderoth; Anna Wexler; Ulf Ziemann; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2022-05-25

6.  The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm.

Authors:  Lars Michael; Ana Böke; Henry Ipczynski
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 7.  Mind-wandering: mechanistic insights from lesion, tDCS, and iEEG.

Authors:  Julia W Y Kam; Matthias Mittner; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 24.482

8.  Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Isobella Allard; Megha Anil; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The time course of ineffective sham-blinding during low-intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Robert Greinacher; Larissa Buhôt; Lisa Möller; Gemma Learmonth
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  A Short-Term Intervention of High-Intensity Exercise and Anodal-tDCS on Motor Learning in Middle-Aged Adults: An RCT.

Authors:  Clare Quinlan; Ben Rattray; Disa Pryor; Joseph M Northey; James Coxon; Nicolas Cherbuin; Sophie C Andrews
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.