Literature DB >> 30887624

Staff experiences and understandings of the REsTRAIN Yourself initiative to minimize the use of physical restraint on mental health wards.

Joy Duxbury1, Gill Thomson2, Amy Scholes3, Fiona Jones2, John Baker4, Soo Downe2, Paul Greenwood5, Owen Price3, Richard Whittington6,7, Mick McKeown2.   

Abstract

International efforts to minimize coercive practices include the US Six Core Strategies© (6CS). This innovative approach has limited evidence of its effectiveness, with few robustly designed studies, and has not been formally implemented or evaluated in the UK. An adapted version of the 6CS, which we called 'REsTRAIN Yourself' (RY), was devised to suit the UK context and evaluated using mixed methods. RY aimed to reduce the use of physical restraint in mental health inpatient ward settings through training and practice development with whole teams, directly in the ward settings where change was to be implemented and barriers to change overcome. In this paper, we present qualitative findings that report on staff perspectives of the impact and value of RY following its implementation. Thirty-six staff participated in semi-structured interviews with data subject to thematic analysis. Eight themes are reported that highlight perceived improvements in every domain of the 6CS after RY had been introduced. Staff reported more positively on their relationships with service users and felt their attitudes towards the use of coercive practices such as restraint were changed; the service as a whole shifted in terms of restraint awareness and reduction; and new policies, procedures, and language were introduced despite certain barriers. These findings need to be appreciated in a context wherein substantial reductions in the use of physical restraint were proven possible, largely due to building upon empathic and relational alternatives. However, yet more could be achieved with greater resourcing of inpatient care.
© 2019 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.

Keywords:  inpatient settings; mental health; minimising restrictive practices; qualitative; restraint; six core strategies; staff perspectives

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30887624     DOI: 10.1111/inm.12577

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1445-8330            Impact factor:   3.503


  6 in total

1.  Post-incident reviews-a gift to the Ward or just another procedure? Care providers' experiences and considerations regarding post-incident reviews after restraint in mental health services. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Unn Elisabeth Hammervold; Reidun Norvoll; Kari Vevatne; Hildegunn Sagvaag
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Patient safety in inpatient mental health settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bethan Thibaut; Lindsay Helen Dewa; Sonny Christian Ramtale; Danielle D'Lima; Sheila Adam; Hutan Ashrafian; Ara Darzi; Stephanie Archer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  De-escalation of conflict in forensic mental health inpatient settings: a Theoretical Domains Framework-informed qualitative investigation of staff and patient perspectives.

Authors:  Isobel Johnston; Owen Price; Peter McPherson; Christopher J Armitage; Helen Brooks; Penny Bee; Karina Lovell; Cat Papastavrou Brooks
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2022-02-15

4.  Coercive containment measures for the management of self-cutting versus general disturbed behaviour: Differences in use and attitudes among mental health nursing staff.

Authors:  Geoffrey L Dickens; Leah Hosie
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-04-17       Impact factor: 5.100

Review 5.  Safewards: An integrative review of the literature within inpatient and forensic mental health units.

Authors:  Antony Mullen; Graeme Browne; Bridget Hamilton; Stephanie Skinner; Brenda Happell
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 5.100

6.  How may cultural and political ideals cause moral distress in acute psychiatry? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Trine-Lise Jansen; Lars Johan Danbolt; Ingrid Hanssen; Marit Helene Hem
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.