| Literature DB >> 30886216 |
Yogini Jaiswal1, Daniel Weber2, Aaron Yerke3, Yanling Xue4,5, Danielle Lehman6, Taufika Williams6, Tiqiao Xiao4,5, Daniel Haddad2, Leonard Williams7.
Abstract
Serenoa repens (saw palmetto) berries are one of the most consumed medicinal herbs in the United States and the wild green variety is used in the initial therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), globally. Use of saw palmetto is approved by the German Commission E, and several clinical trials are underway for evaluation of its efficacy. Exploitation of its habitats and over foraging imperil this plant, which only grows in the wild. This is the first study, to propose the use of the S. repens forma glauca (silver variety) as a qualitative substitute for the wild variety, to support its conservation. We compared tissue microstructures and lipid and water distribution through spatial imaging and examined metabolite distribution of three tissue domains and whole berries. This combined approach of 3D imaging and metabolomics provides a new strategy for studying phenotypic traits and metabolite synthesis of closely related plant varieties.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30886216 PMCID: PMC6423146 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41150-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1X-ray μ-CT sections and segmented regions of berries. (A) Berries of saw palmetto green (SP) and (B), berries of silver saw palmetto (SL). a, Transverse sections, b, longitudinal sections, c, micro-CT grey scale image and d, segmented regions of the berries for analysis.
Structural characteristics of the berries of S. repens obtained by X-ray μ-CT analysis.
| Parameters | SP | SL |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity of epicarp and sarcocarp (%) | 19.133 ± 21.956 | 50.021 ± 43.323 |
| Void volume of seed (108 μm3) | 66.600 ± 0.104 | 116.340 ± 0.008 |
| Void volume of epicarp and sarcocarp (108 μm3) | 11.855 ± 0.063 | 4.552 ± 0.005 |
| Void shape factor of seed | 4.008 ± 5.381 | 1.741 ± 0.322 |
| Void shape factor of epicarp and sarcocarp | 0.632 ± 0.347 | 0.545 ± 0.401 |
| Crofton perimeter of seed (102 μm) | 30.689 ± 25.210 | 590.369 ± 158.62 |
| Crofton perimeter of epicarp and sarcocarp (102 μm) | 58.965 ± 30.302 | 96.798 ± 120.049 |
| Anisotropy factor of seed | 0.724 ± 0.038 | 0.730 ± 0.018 |
| Anisotropy factor of epicarp and sarcocarp | 0.448 ± 0.388 | 0.403 ± 0.296 |
| Sphericity of seed | 1.241 ± 0.216 | 1.112 ± 0.012 |
| Sphericity of epicarp and sarcocarp | 1.199 ± 0.054 | 1.430 ± 0.260 |
Sample sizes used for analysis were n = 3. Values mentioned above indicate mean ± standard deviations of the respective parameters. SL and SP denote the silver and wild green varieties of S. repens, respectively.
Figure 2MRI images of axial slices of S. repens berries, indicating internal structures. (a,b) Represent the lipid and water distribution in wild green variety (SP), respectively and (c,d), represent the lipid and water distribution in silver variety (SL), respectively. For better visualisation of the lower intensities, a non-linear grey-scale was used which overemphasizes the lower values and chops off the highest values by setting them to the maximum value of the grey-scale.
Figure 3Volume rendering from 3D datasets obtained by MRI imaging of S. repens berries. (a) 3D volume rendering images of wild green variety (SP), and (b), 3D volume rendering images of silver variety (SL). The lipid, water and overlay of lipid and water distribution signals are indicated in the left, middle and right 3D images.
Metabolites putatively identified in extracts of S. repens berries by MALDI-TOF/TOF analysis in negative mode.
| Constituents | Measured [M-H]− | Theoretical [M-H]− | Mass measurement accuracy (Δ ppm) | SP Relative Intensities | SL Relative Intensities | METLIN ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Isomyristicin | 191.080 | 191.071 | 47.10 | — | 1.932 | 90582 |
| Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) | 255.227 | 255.233 | −23.51 | 1.69 | 0.86 | 187 |
| Heptadecanoic acid (margaric acid) | 269.257 | 269.248 | 33.43 | 2.06 | 0.42 | 4206 |
| 2,3-Dihydroxypropyl dodecanoate (1-Monolaurin) | 273.187 | 273.207 | −73.20 | 4.89 | 8.06 | 344007 |
| 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (linoleic acid) | 279.245 | 279.233 | 42.97 | 1.20 | 0.70 | 191 |
| 11-Octadecenoic acid (vaccenic acid) | 281.210 | 281.248 | −135.11 | 1.29 | 1.90 | 3552 |
| 9-Octadecenoic acid (oleic acid) | 281.244 | 281.248 | −14.22 | 6.64 | 5.35 | 190 |
| n-Octadecanoic acid (stearic acid) | 283.256 | 283.264 | −28.24 | 2.58 | 0.45 | 189 |
| 11-Eicosenoic acid (gondoic acid) | 309.298 | 309.279 | 61.43 | 5.01 | 0.83 | 3554 |
| Eicosanoic acid (arachidic acid) | 311.287 | 311.295 | −25.70 | 9.45 | 41.27 | 401 |
| Docosanoic acid (behenic acid) | 339.327 | 339.326 | 2.95 | 2.56 | 10.18 | 344007 |
|
| ||||||
| 1,20-Eicosanediol | 313.322 | 313.311 | 35.11 | 2.86 | 2.84 | 95423 |
| 1-Docosanol (behenyl alcohol) | 325.328 | 325.347 | −58.40 | 9.86 | 37.74 | 4298 |
| 1-Tetracosanol (lignoceryl alcohol) | 353.370 | 353.378 | −22.64 | 0.8 | 1.31 | 46173 |
|
| ||||||
| Campest-5-en-3beta-ol (campesterol) | 399.386 | 399.363 | 57.59 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 167 |
| Stigmasta-5,22-dien-3beta-ol (stigmasterol) | 411.326 | 411.363 | −89.94 | — | 0.33 | 168 |
| Cycloarterenol (cycloartenol) | 425.345 | 425.378 | −77.58 | — | 0.41 | 34476 |
| beta-sitosteryl-beta-D-glucopyranoside (daucosterol) | 575.481 | 575.431 | 86.89 | 0.45 | 0.34 | 89636 |
|
| ||||||
| Dodecanoic acid (lauric acid) | 199.174 | 199.170 | 20.08 | 3.74 | 3.06 | 357 |
| 5-Pentadecylresorcinol (resorcinol) | 319.277 | 319.264 | 40.72 | 1.56 | 2 | 68597 |
| Propyl 9-octadecenoate (propyl oleate) | 323.287 | 323.295 | −24.75 | 1.65 | 2.01 | 97358 |
| 23-methyl-tetracosanoic acid | 377.338 | 377.342 | −10.60 | 2.9 | 2.47 | 73679 |
|
| ||||||
| 3,7,11,15-Tetramethylhexadec-2-en-1-ol (phytol) | 295.318 | 295.300 | 60.95 | 1.37 | 0.45 | 391 |
| Kaempferol 3-glucoside-7-xyloside | 579.169 | 579.135 | 58.71 | — | 0.42 | 50152 |
|
| ||||||
| 2-Hydroxyxanthone | 211.042 | 211.04 | 9.48 | — | 0.44 | 44452 |
| 2-Methoxyxanthone | 225.057 | 225.055 | 8.89 | — | 1.4 | 43829 |
| 3,4′,5,7-Tetrahydroxyflavone (kaempferol) | 285.037 | 285.040 | −10.52 | 1.82 | 0.36 | 3410 |
| Apigenin-7-O-rhamnoglucoside (rhoifolin) | 577.152 | 577.156 | −6.93 | 0.67 | 0.79 | 44401 |
|
| ||||||
| 6-Deoxy-L-Galactose (fucose) | 163.053 | 163.061 | −49.06 | 2.98 | — | 63169 |
| (3S,4R,5R)-1,3,4,5,6-pentahydroxyhexan-2-one (D-Fructose) | 179.056 | 179.056 | 0 | 2.88 | 0.53 | 68675 |
| (2R, 3R, 4R, 5R)-hexane-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexol (D-Mannitol) | 181.073 | 181.071 | 11.05 | 5.19 | 0.69 | 142 |
Metabolites were putatively identified based on mass accuracy and comparison to chemical databases. SL and SP denote the silver and wild green varieties of S. repens, respectively. The relative intensities of samples were calculated with n = 5. (—) indicates absence of the constituent in the listed sample group.
Figure 4Negative mode MALDI-TOF/TOF MS spectra of selected fruit varieties. (a) Chloroform extract of SL variety and (b), chloroform extract of SP variety. Selected identified compounds are labelled with compound names and mass deviations.
Figure 5MALDI-MSI of representative metabolite distribution in transverse sections of berries of S. repens identified without TIC optimization (a–d), represent SP variety and (e–h), represent SL variety with 9-Amino acridine (AA) (red, m/z 193.061) as the matrix. (a,e), represent binary images of sections of SP and SL, respectively. (b,f) Depict overlay of ion images for linoleic acid (green, m/z 279.233) and lignoceryl alcohol (blue, m/z 353.378). (c,g) Depict overlay of ion images for daucosterol (green, m/z 575.434) and oleic acid (blue, m/z 281.248). (d,h) Depict overlay of ion images for rhoifolin (green, m/z 577.156) and mannitol (blue, m/z 181.071). All images were generated without TIC normalization method with a m/z window of 50 ppm. EC represents the epicarp, SC the sarcocarp, SRM is the region of seed location deposited by matrix and M represents the deposited matrix.
Figure 6Principal component analysis plots of metabolomes of wild green and silver variety of S. repens berries. (a) PCA derived from all metabolites identified in GC-MS analysis (b) PCA derived from all metabolites identified in LC-MS analysis and (c) PCA derived from selected metabolites identified in MALDI-TOF analysis.