Literature DB >> 30883405

Improvement in Kidney Function After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Its Influence on Thromboembolism, Hemorrhage, and Mortality.

Brittney H Davis1, Amelia K Boehme2, Salpy V Pamboukian3, Michael Allon4, James F George5, Chrisly Dillon1, James K Kirklin5, Jose Tallaj3, Emily B Levitan6, Russell Griffin6, Gerald McGwin6, T Mark Beasley7, Nita A Limdi1,6.   

Abstract

Although heart transplantation remains the gold standard for management of heart failure, ventricular assist devices (VAD) have emerged as viable alternatives. VAD implantation improves kidney function. However, whether the improvement is sustained or associated with improved outcomes is unclear. Herein we assess kidney function improvement, predictors of improvement, and associations with thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and mortality in VAD patients. Kidney function was defined using chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages: stage 1 (glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥ 90 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 2 (eGFR 60-90 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 3a (eGFR 45-59 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 3b (eGFR 30-44 ml/min/1.73 m), stage 4 (eGFR 15-30 ml/min/1.73 m), and stage 5 (eGFR < 15 ml/min/1.73 m). Improvement in kidney function was defined as an improvement in eGFR that resulted in a CKD stage change to one of lesser severity. Kidney function improved post implant, and was maintained over 1 year for all patients, except those with baseline stage 5 CKD. Younger age at implantation (OR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.90-0.96, P < 0.0001) was associated with sustained improvement in kidney function. Poor kidney function was associated increased mortality but not with thromboembolism or hemorrhage. Compared to patients with baseline eGFR > 45 ml/min/1.73 m; patients with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73 m had a higher mortality risk (HR 3.32, 95% CI: 1.10-9.98, p = 0.03 for stage 3b; HR 4.07, 95% CI: 1.27-13.1, p = 0.02 for stage 4; and HR 4.01, 95% CI: 1.17-13.7, p = 0.03 for stage 5 CKD). Kidney function was not associated with thromboembolism or hemorrhage, and sustained improvement was not associated with lower risk of death. However, poor kidney function at implantation was associated with an increased risk of mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 30883405      PMCID: PMC6744354          DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000000989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   3.826


  39 in total

1.  Effects of left ventricular assist devices on outcomes in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Authors:  A J Bank; S H Mir; D Q Nguyen; R M Bolman; S J Shumway; L W Miller; D R Kaiser; S M Ormaza; S J Park
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Relationship between renal function and left ventricular assist device use.

Authors:  Javed Butler; Carrie Geisberg; Renee Howser; Peer M Portner; Joseph G Rogers; Mario C Deng; Richard N Pierson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  The Influence of Pre-Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Implantation Glomerular Filtration Rate on Long-Term LVAD Outcomes.

Authors:  Burhan Mohamedali; Geetha Bhat
Journal:  Heart Lung Circ       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 2.975

4.  Chronic kidney disease and venous thromboembolism: a prospective study.

Authors:  Aaron R Folsom; Pamela L Lutsey; Brad C Astor; Keattiyoat Wattanakit; Susan R Heckbert; Mary Cushman
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Factors Associated With Prolonged Survival in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.

Authors:  Yu Xia; Stephen Forest; Patricia Friedmann; Lin-Chiang Chou; Snehal Patel; Ulrich Jorde; Daniel Goldstein
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Non-adherence to aspirin or oral anticoagulants in secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  E L L M De Schryver; J van Gijn; L J Kappelle; P J Koudstaal; A Algra
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  ACCF/AHA/HFSA 2011 survey results: current staffing profile of heart failure programs, including programs that perform heart transplant and mechanical circulatory support device implantation.

Authors:  Mariell Jessup; Nancy M Albert; David E Lanfear; JoAnn Lindenfeld; Barry M Massie; Mary Norine Walsh; Mark J Zucker
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.712

8.  Renal function with left ventricular assist devices: the poorer the preoperative renal function, the longer the recovery.

Authors:  Ling Ma; Yuji Fujino; Goro Matsumiya; Yoshiki Sawa; Takashi Mashimo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2008-12

9.  Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Tal Hasin; Yariv Marmor; Walter Kremers; Yan Topilsky; Cathy J Severson; John A Schirger; Barry A Boilson; Alfredo L Clavell; Richard J Rodeheffer; Robert P Frantz; Brooks S Edwards; Naveen L Pereira; John M Stulak; Lyle Joyce; Richard Daly; Soon J Park; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Anemia and renal insufficiency are independent risk factors for death among patients with congestive heart failure admitted to community hospitals: a population-based study.

Authors:  William M McClellan; W Dana Flanders; Robert D Langston; Claudine Jurkovitz; Rodney Presley
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical circulatory support in children: past, present and future.

Authors:  Svetlana B Shugh; Kyle W Riggs; David L S Morales
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2019-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.