Literature DB >> 23219299

Readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device.

Tal Hasin1, Yariv Marmor, Walter Kremers, Yan Topilsky, Cathy J Severson, John A Schirger, Barry A Boilson, Alfredo L Clavell, Richard J Rodeheffer, Robert P Frantz, Brooks S Edwards, Naveen L Pereira, John M Stulak, Lyle Joyce, Richard Daly, Soon J Park, Sudhir S Kushwaha.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence and causes of readmissions after implantation of axial flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
BACKGROUND: Based on the REMATCH (Randomized Evaluation of Mechanical Assistance for the Treatment of Congestive Heart Failure) study experience, readmissions after LVAD implantation are thought to be frequent.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed admissions to our facility in a cohort of 115 patients implanted between January 2008 and July 2011 with the HeartMate II axial flow LVAD, of whom 42 were bridged to transplant. To account for repeated events, Andersen-Gill models were used to determine possible predictors.
RESULTS: The patients were followed for 1.4 ± 0.9 years. There were 224 readmissions in 83 patients. The overall readmission rate was 1.64 ± 1.97 per patient-year of follow-up. The readmission rate for the first 6 months was 2.0 ± 2.3 and decreased to 1.2 ± 2.1 during subsequent follow-up. Leading causes were bleeding (66 readmissions in 34 patients), mostly gastrointestinal bleed (51 in 27 patients), cardiac (51 in 36 patients, most for HF or arrhythmia), infections (32 in 25 patients) of which 6 were pump related, and thrombosis (20 in 15 patients) including 13 readmissions due to hemolysis. Preoperative variables associated with (fewer) readmissions in a multivariate model include residence within our hospital-extended referral zone of Minnesota and the neighboring states (hazard ratio: 0.66; 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 0.91; p = 0.011), hemoglobin (hazard ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.84 to 0.99; p = 0.027) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 1.0 per 1,000-unit increase, p = 0.022). C-statistic for the model: 0.63.
CONCLUSIONS: Readmission rates after axial flow LVAD implantation decrease during the first 6 months and then stabilize. The leading causes are bleeding, cardiac (heart failure and arrhythmia), infections, and thrombosis.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23219299     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  53 in total

Review 1.  Remote hemodynamic monitoring for ambulatory left ventricular assist device patients.

Authors:  Brent C Lampert; Sitaramesh Emani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Mesenchymal precursor cells as adjunctive therapy in recipients of contemporary left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Deborah D Ascheim; Annetine C Gelijns; Daniel Goldstein; Lemuel A Moye; Nicholas Smedira; Sangjin Lee; Charles T Klodell; Anita Szady; Michael K Parides; Neal O Jeffries; Donna Skerrett; Doris A Taylor; J Eduardo Rame; Carmelo Milano; Joseph G Rogers; Janine Lynch; Todd Dewey; Eric Eichhorn; Benjamin Sun; David Feldman; Robert Simari; Patrick T O'Gara; Wendy C Taddei-Peters; Marissa A Miller; Yoshifumi Naka; Emilia Bagiella; Eric A Rose; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Contemporary strategies in the diagnosis and management of heart failure.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Naveen L Pereira; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2014-03-29       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Mechanical circulatory support in advanced heart failure #205, 2nd ed.

Authors:  Keith M Swetz; Daniel D Matlock; Heather Ferris; Susan Hunt
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 5.  Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Jasper J Brugts
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 6.  Coagulopathy in Mechanical Circulatory Support: A Fine Balance.

Authors:  Julie L Rosenthal; Randall C Starling
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Telemonitoring of left-ventricular assist device patients-current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Nils Reiss; Thomas Schmidt; Michael Boeckelmann; Sebastian Schulte-Eistrup; Jan-Dirk Hoffmann; Christina Feldmann; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The impact of insurance and socioeconomic status on outcomes for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Sakima A Smith; Ayesha K Hasan; Philip F Binkley; Randi E Foraker
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Optimal Hemodynamics During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Are Associated With Reduced Readmission Rates.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Nitasha Sarswat; Sara Kalantari; Bryan Smith; Daniel Rodgers; Stephanie Besser; Ben Chung; Ann Nguyen; Nikhil Narang; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Colleen Juricek; Mandeep Mehra; Maria Rosa Costanzo; Ulrich P Jorde; Daniel Burkhoff; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Performance Improvement to Decrease Readmission Rates for Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  Jackeline Iseler; John Fox; Kelly Wierenga
Journal:  Prog Transplant       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 1.187

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.