Burhan Mohamedali1, Geetha Bhat2. 1. Division of Cardiology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: burhan_mohamedali@rush.edu. 2. Division of Cardiology, Advocate Christ Medical Center, Oak Lawn, IL, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known predictor for adverse outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure requiring left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effect of pre-LVAD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on post-LVAD outcomes in CKD patients is not completely understood. Additionally, a subset of patients improve their GFR after LVAD placement. In this study we sought to determine the effects of pre-LVAD GFR on post-LVAD outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy consecutive patients with LVADs were enrolled. Patients were stratified based on a GFR cut-off of 60mL/min/1.73m2. Patients with preoperative GFR <60 were further divided into two subgroups based post-LVAD discharge GFR of 60. Post-LVAD major adverse effects were analysed. RESULTS: Patients with pre-implant GFR <60 had higher all cause mortality than patients with pre-implant GFR ≥60 (45% vs. 27%, p=0.006). These patients also had higher incidence of early right ventricular failure and congestive heart failure hospitalisations. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed poor survival in this group. When the subgroup analysis of patients in the GFR <60 cohort was performed, the above findings were heavily weighted towards patients who did not improve their GFR to ≥60 post-LVAD. CONCLUSION: Pre-implant GFR is an important prognostic marker in LVAD patients. Patients with pre-implant GFR <60 are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Our findings suggest that the patients who do not improve their GFR post-LVAD are at the highest risk.
BACKGROUND:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a known predictor for adverse outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure requiring left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). The effect of pre-LVAD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) on post-LVAD outcomes in CKDpatients is not completely understood. Additionally, a subset of patients improve their GFR after LVAD placement. In this study we sought to determine the effects of pre-LVAD GFR on post-LVAD outcomes. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy consecutive patients with LVADs were enrolled. Patients were stratified based on a GFR cut-off of 60mL/min/1.73m2. Patients with preoperative GFR <60 were further divided into two subgroups based post-LVAD discharge GFR of 60. Post-LVAD major adverse effects were analysed. RESULTS:Patients with pre-implant GFR <60 had higher all cause mortality than patients with pre-implant GFR ≥60 (45% vs. 27%, p=0.006). These patients also had higher incidence of early right ventricular failure and congestive heart failure hospitalisations. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed poor survival in this group. When the subgroup analysis of patients in the GFR <60 cohort was performed, the above findings were heavily weighted towards patients who did not improve their GFR to ≥60 post-LVAD. CONCLUSION: Pre-implant GFR is an important prognostic marker in LVAD patients. Patients with pre-implant GFR <60 are at higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Our findings suggest that the patients who do not improve their GFR post-LVAD are at the highest risk.
Authors: Brittney H Davis; Amelia K Boehme; Salpy V Pamboukian; Michael Allon; James F George; Chrisly Dillon; James K Kirklin; Jose Tallaj; Emily B Levitan; Russell Griffin; Gerald McGwin; T Mark Beasley; Nita A Limdi Journal: ASAIO J Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 3.826
Authors: J Hunter Mehaffey; Ryan Cantor; Susan Myers; Nicholas R Teman; John A Kern; Gorav Ailawadi; Francis Pagani; James Kirklin; Kenan Yount; Leora Yarboro Journal: JTCVS Open Date: 2022-01-22