Lorraine B Robbins1, Fujun Wen, Jiying Ling. 1. Lorraine B. Robbins, PhD, RN, FNP-BC, FAAN, is Associate Professor, Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing. Fujun Wen, MEd, is Master's Degree in Biostatistics Student, Michigan State University Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, East Lansing. Jiying Ling, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The minimal effect of interventions to date on increasing young adolescent girls' physical activity (PA) may be due to inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying behavior change, yet sparse research testing a PA intervention has examined the capacity of theories to explain PA, particularly when using objective measures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine whether constructs from the health promotion model and self-determination theory mediated changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) following a 17-week intervention. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a group randomized trial, including 12 intervention and 12 control schools in the Midwestern United States. Data were collected in 2012-2016. Girls (fifth- to eighth-grade, N = 1,519) completed surveys on perceivedbenefits and enjoyment of PA, PA self-efficacy, social support and motivation for PA, and barriers to PA and wore accelerometers. RESULTS: The final path model had a good fit: χ(4) = 2.48, p = .648; goodness-of-fit index = 1; comparative fit index = 1; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0; standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.01. For MVPA change from baseline to postintervention, enjoyment (B = 24.48, p < .001) and social support (B = 30.48, p < .001) had a positive direct effect, whereas the intervention had a positive indirect effect through enjoyment and social support (B = 9.13, p < .001). Enjoyment (B = -13.83, p < .001) and social support (B = -17.22, p < .001) had a negative indirect effect on MVPA change from postintervention to follow-up. DISCUSSION: Enjoyment of PA and social support for PA may be important mediators of PA in young adolescent girls and warrant consideration when designing interventions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The minimal effect of interventions to date on increasing young adolescent girls' physical activity (PA) may be due to inadequate understanding of the mechanisms underlying behavior change, yet sparse research testing a PA intervention has examined the capacity of theories to explain PA, particularly when using objective measures. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to examine whether constructs from the health promotion model and self-determination theory mediated changes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) following a 17-week intervention. METHODS: The study was a secondary analysis of data from a group randomized trial, including 12 intervention and 12 control schools in the Midwestern United States. Data were collected in 2012-2016. Girls (fifth- to eighth-grade, N = 1,519) completed surveys on perceived benefits and enjoyment of PA, PA self-efficacy, social support and motivation for PA, and barriers to PA and wore accelerometers. RESULTS: The final path model had a good fit: χ(4) = 2.48, p = .648; goodness-of-fit index = 1; comparative fit index = 1; root-mean-square error of approximation = 0; standardized root-mean-square residual = 0.01. For MVPA change from baseline to postintervention, enjoyment (B = 24.48, p < .001) and social support (B = 30.48, p < .001) had a positive direct effect, whereas the intervention had a positive indirect effect through enjoyment and social support (B = 9.13, p < .001). Enjoyment (B = -13.83, p < .001) and social support (B = -17.22, p < .001) had a negative indirect effect on MVPA change from postintervention to follow-up. DISCUSSION: Enjoyment of PA and social support for PA may be important mediators of PA in young adolescent girls and warrant consideration when designing interventions.
Authors: Deborah L Dewar; Philip J Morgan; Ronald C Plotnikoff; Anthony D Okely; Marijka Batterham; David R Lubans Journal: J Sci Med Sport Date: 2013-03-16 Impact factor: 4.319
Authors: Lorraine B Robbins; Jiying Ling; Danielle M Dalimonte-Merckling; Dhruv B Sharma; Marion Bakhoya; Karin A Pfeiffer Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2017-12-21 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Laura Kann; Tim McManus; William A Harris; Shari L Shanklin; Katherine H Flint; Joseph Hawkins; Barbara Queen; Richard Lowry; Emily O'Malley Olsen; David Chyen; Lisa Whittle; Jemekia Thornton; Connie Lim; Yoshimi Yamakawa; Nancy Brener; Stephanie Zaza Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2016-06-10
Authors: Mikel Vaquero-Solís; Damián Iglesias Gallego; Miguel Ángel Tapia-Serrano; Juan J Pulido; Pedro Antonio Sánchez-Miguel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Julia Zimmermann; Henri Tilga; Joachim Bachner; Yolanda Demetriou Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-10 Impact factor: 3.390