| Literature DB >> 32093347 |
Leon Klos1, Katharina Feil1, Tanja Eberhardt1, Darko Jekauc1.
Abstract
Interventions to promote physical activity (PA) in children, adolescents and young adults based on social-cognitive theories often fail to increase PA. In recent years, affect-based approaches have gained interest, but the current state of research is not sufficiently reported. Therefore, a systematic review about the influence of interventions to promote positive affect and PA enjoyment and PA in children, adolescents and young adults was conducted. Literature searches were carried out including studies published between September 2009 and April 2019. Intervention studies targeting healthy children, adolescents or young adults and measuring enjoyment and PA were included. Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including five group-based PA interventions, three multi-component school interventions, two internet-based interventions and three exergaming interventions. Most studies use multiple components in their intervention. Group-based PA programs incorporating task-oriented teaching styles and opportunities for voluntary PA are most consistently associated with positive findings. This review shows moderate evidence of interventions for children, adolescents and young adults being effective in increasing enjoyment and PA. Besides physical education and comprehensive school interventions, heterogenous intervention designs limit the comparability of studies. Future research should focus on theory-based, multi-component interventions with mediator analyses.Entities:
Keywords: adolescents; affect; children; emotion; enjoyment; intervention; physical activity; self-determination theory
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093347 PMCID: PMC7076746 DOI: 10.3390/sports8020026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports (Basel) ISSN: 2075-4663
Figure 1Results of the literature research, 2009–2019.
Characteristics of included studies.
| Characteristics | Samples N (%) |
|---|---|
| 5 (39) | |
| 3 (23) | |
| 8 (62) | |
| 8 (62) | |
| 1 (8) | |
| 6 (46) | |
| 4 (31) |
SDT: Self-Determination Theory; PACES: Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; s-PACES: short Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; IMI: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory; MPAM-R: Motivation for Physical Activity Measure—Revised.
Data extraction.
| Source | Study Design | Sample | Intervention | Outcome | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direito et al., 2015 [ | RCT | adolescents | 8 weeks | enjoyment: PACES | enjoyment (n.s.) |
| Fairclough et al., 2016 [ | CT | 4 co-educational primary schools | 6 weeks | enjoyment: short-form IMI (baseline, mid-test) | group x time interaction for enjoyment in (1) ( |
| Fu et al., 2018 [ | RCT | preschool | 12 weeks | enjoyment: subscale of IMI | enjoyment (n.s.) |
| George et al., 2015 [ | Cohort | after school program | 6 weeks | enjoyment: PACES, subscale of IMI | enjoyment: PACES (n.s.), IMI (n.s.) |
| Grâsten and Yli-Piipari, 2019 [ | Achievement Goal Theory, Social Ecological Model | Elementary school children | 2 years | enjoyment: PE Enjoyment Scale | No change in PE enjoyment over time in (1) (n.s.) and (2) (n.s.) |
| Huberty et al. [ | Cohort | 7 after school programs | 12 weeks | enjoyment: s-PACES | increase in enjoyment from baseline to follow-up ( |
| Invernizzi et al., 2019 [ | RCT | fifth-grade students | 12 weeks | enjoyment: PACES | difference of enjoyment between (1) and (2) (η² = 0.96, |
| Miragall et al., 2017 [ | TTM | inactive university students | 3 weeks | enjoyment: s-PACES | Group main effect in enjoyment (η² = 0.09, |
| Murillo Pardo et al., 2016 [ | SDT, Social Ecological Model | 4 secondary schoolsn = 553 (47% female) | 1–3 academic years | enjoyment: PACES | positive intervention effect on enjoyment in (1) ( |
| Quartiroli and Maeda, 2016 [ | SDT, TPB | university students | 15 weeks | enjoyment: subscale of MPAM-R | enjoyment (n.s.) |
| Robbins et al., 2019 [ | SDT, HPM | 24 secondary schools | 17 weeks | enjoyment: PA Enjoyment Scale | positive intervention effect on enjoyment in (1) ( |
| Thompson et al., 2013 [ | Cohort | African American church community | 12 weeks | enjoyment: PACES | enjoyment (n.s.) |
| Wang et al., 2015 [ | SDT | university students | 8 weeks | enjoyment: subscale of IMI | time x group interaction effect in enjoyment (η² = 0.34, |
TTM: Trans-Theoretical Model; SDT: Self-Determination Theory; TPB: Theory of Planned Behavior; HPM: Health Promotion Model; RCT: randomized controlled trial; CT: controlled trial; ANOVA: Analysis of Variance; rANOVA: repeated measure ANOVA; ANCOVA: Analysis of Covariance; MANOVA: Multivariate Analysis of Variance; PA: physical activity; PE: physical education; LPA: light physical activity, MPA: moderate physical activity; MVPA: moderate-vigorous physical activity; VPA: vigorous physical activity; SPA: strength physical activity; STPA: stretching; PAQ-A: Physical Activity Questionnaire; sIPAQ: short International Physical Activity Questionnaire; APARQ: Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire; PACES: Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; s-PACES: short Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale; IMI: Intrinsic Motivation Inventory; MPAM-R: Motivation for Physical Activity Measure—Revised; HBSC: Health Behavior in School-aged Children Research Protocol; PAQ-C: Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children; n.s: not significant.