N Lemeunier1,2,3, S da Silva-Oolup4, K Olesen4, H Shearer5,6, L J Carroll7, O Brady8, E Côté9, P Stern4, T Tuff4, M Suri-Chilana4, P Torres10, J J Wong5,6,4, D Sutton5,6, K Murnaghan6, P Côté5,6,11. 1. Institut Franco-Européen de Chiropraxie (IFEC), 72 chemin de la Flambère, 31300, Toulouse, France. nlemeunier@ifec.net. 2. UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON, L1H 7K4, Canada. nlemeunier@ifec.net. 3. Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. nlemeunier@ifec.net. 4. Graduate Education and Research Programs, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, Canada. 5. UOIT-CMCC Centre for Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON, L1H 7K4, Canada. 6. Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CMCC), 6100 Leslie Street, Toronto, ON, M2H 3J1, Canada. 7. School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 4075 Research Transition Facility, 8308 - 114 St., Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E1, Canada. 8. School of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, 3515 E. Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL, USA. 9. Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, 340 College St., Toronto, ON, M5T 3A9, Canada. 10. Rehabilitation Centre, San Cristobal Clinic, Santiago Spine Group, Santiago, Chile. 11. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), 2000 Simcoe St. N., Oshawa, ON, L1H 7K4, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with grades I-IV neck pain and its associated disorders (NAD). METHODS: We updated the systematic review of the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders and systematically searched databases from 2005 to 2017. Independent reviewers screened and critically appraised studies using standardized tools. Evidence from low-risk-of-bias studies was synthesized according to best evidence synthesis principles. Validity studies were ranked according to the Sackett and Haynes classification. RESULTS: We screened 2823 articles, and 26 were eligible for critical appraisal; 18 were low risk of bias. Preliminary evidence suggests that the Neck Disability Index (original and short versions), Whiplash Disability Questionnaire, Neck Pain Driving Index, and ProFitMap-Neck may be valid and reliable to measure disability in patients with NAD. We found preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of pain measurements including the Body Pain Diagram, Visual Analogue Scale, the Numeric Rating Scale and the Pain-DETECT Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting the validity and reliability of instruments used to measure pain and disability is preliminary. Further validity studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of self-reported questionnaires to assess pain and disability in patients with NAD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: To determine the reliability and validity of self-reported questionnaires to measure pain and disability in adults with grades I-IV neck pain and its associated disorders (NAD). METHODS: We updated the systematic review of the 2000-2010 Bone and Joint Decade Task Force on Neck Pain and its Associated Disorders and systematically searched databases from 2005 to 2017. Independent reviewers screened and critically appraised studies using standardized tools. Evidence from low-risk-of-bias studies was synthesized according to best evidence synthesis principles. Validity studies were ranked according to the Sackett and Haynes classification. RESULTS: We screened 2823 articles, and 26 were eligible for critical appraisal; 18 were low risk of bias. Preliminary evidence suggests that the Neck Disability Index (original and short versions), Whiplash Disability Questionnaire, Neck Pain Driving Index, and ProFitMap-Neck may be valid and reliable to measure disability in patients with NAD. We found preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of pain measurements including the Body Pain Diagram, Visual Analogue Scale, the Numeric Rating Scale and the Pain-DETECT Questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting the validity and reliability of instruments used to measure pain and disability is preliminary. Further validity studies are needed to confirm the clinical utility of self-reported questionnaires to assess pain and disability in patients with NAD. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Authors: N Lemeunier; E B Jeoun; M Suri; T Tuff; H Shearer; S Mior; J J Wong; S da Silva-Oolup; P Torres; C D'Silva; P Stern; H Yu; M Millan; D Sutton; K Murnaghan; P Cȏté Journal: Musculoskelet Sci Pract Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 2.520
Authors: Jaime Guzman; Eric L Hurwitz; Linda J Carroll; Scott Haldeman; Pierre Côté; Eugene J Carragee; Paul M Peloso; Gabrielle van der Velde; Lena W Holm; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Margareta Nordin; J David Cassidy Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2008-02-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: N Lemeunier; S da Silva-Oolup; K Olesen; H Shearer; L J Carroll; O Brady; E Côté; P Stern; T Tuff; M Suri-Chilana; P Torres; J J Wong; D Sutton; K Murnaghan; P Côté Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 3.134