CONTEXT: Parents of children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) report inadequate communication and a lack of empathy during conversations with their clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To assess quantitatively and qualitatively the contributions made by team members of different professions in communicating with parents during family meetings. METHODS: Prospective observational study. The study was conducted in the pediatric CICU at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Subjects were members of the interprofessional team attending family meetings for patients admitted to the CICU longer than two weeks. We used quantitative conversation attribution and coding to compare durations of attendee contributions and contribution type by professional role. The SCOPE codebook and other quantitative codes drawn from best practices in family meetings were used to measure communication behaviors. A qualitative analysis of nurses' and social workers' contributions was used to identify themes not otherwise captured. RESULTS: Across 10 meetings, physicians spoke for an average of 78.1% (SD 10.7%) of each meeting, nonphysicians 9.6% (SD 7.8%), and parents 17.4% (SD 12.2%). Parental understanding was assessed an average of 0.2 (SD 0.4) times per meeting. Parents expressed emotion an average of 4.2 times per meeting (SD 7.1), and the clinical team responded empathetically 2.2 times per meeting (SD 4.3). All clinician empathic responses were a minority of their overall contributions. Conversation was almost exclusively between physicians and families until physicians indicated other team members could contribute. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of team members' roles in the meetings may improve parental engagement necessary for decision-making and empathic responses that are often missed.
CONTEXT: Parents of children in the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) report inadequate communication and a lack of empathy during conversations with their clinicians. OBJECTIVE: To assess quantitatively and qualitatively the contributions made by team members of different professions in communicating with parents during family meetings. METHODS: Prospective observational study. The study was conducted in the pediatric CICU at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. Subjects were members of the interprofessional team attending family meetings for patients admitted to the CICU longer than two weeks. We used quantitative conversation attribution and coding to compare durations of attendee contributions and contribution type by professional role. The SCOPE codebook and other quantitative codes drawn from best practices in family meetings were used to measure communication behaviors. A qualitative analysis of nurses' and social workers' contributions was used to identify themes not otherwise captured. RESULTS: Across 10 meetings, physicians spoke for an average of 78.1% (SD 10.7%) of each meeting, nonphysicians 9.6% (SD 7.8%), and parents 17.4% (SD 12.2%). Parental understanding was assessed an average of 0.2 (SD 0.4) times per meeting. Parents expressed emotion an average of 4.2 times per meeting (SD 7.1), and the clinical team responded empathetically 2.2 times per meeting (SD 4.3). All clinician empathic responses were a minority of their overall contributions. Conversation was almost exclusively between physicians and families until physicians indicated other team members could contribute. CONCLUSIONS: Coordination of team members' roles in the meetings may improve parental engagement necessary for decision-making and empathic responses that are often missed.
Authors: Tessie W October; Pamela S Hinds; Jichuan Wang; Zoelle B Dizon; Yao I Cheng; Debra L Roter Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Andrew Balluffi; Nancy Kassam-Adams; Anne Kazak; Michelle Tucker; Troy Dominguez; Mark Helfaer Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Elizabeth D Blume; Emily Morell Balkin; Ranjit Aiyagari; Sonja Ziniel; Dorothy M Beke; Ravi Thiagarajan; Laura Taylor; Thomas Kulik; Kenneth Pituch; Joanne Wolfe Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Jonathan R McDonagh; Tricia B Elliott; Ruth A Engelberg; Patsy D Treece; Sarah E Shannon; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Donald L Patrick; J Randall Curtis Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Jennifer K Walter; Theodore E Schall; Aaron G DeWitt; Jennifer Faerber; Heather Griffis; Meghan Galligan; Victoria Miller; Robert M Arnold; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Sam Farley; Simran Bansal; Mary Carol Barks; Kathryn I Pollak; Erica C Kaye; Anna Quarles; Kathleen Briglia; Erika Johnson; Kristen Lakis; Monica E Lemmon Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2022-03-14 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Mary Katherine Miller; Elizabeth D Blume; Chase Samsel; Eleni Elia; David W Brown; Emily Morell Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 1.838
Authors: Valerie Bailey; Dorothy M Beke; Jennifer M Snaman; Faraz Alizadeh; Sarah Goldberg; Melissa Smith-Parrish; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Elizabeth D Blume; Katie M Moynihan Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Jennifer K Walter; Douglas Hill; William A Drust; Amy Lisanti; Aaron DeWitt; Amanda Seelhorst; Ma Luisa Hasiuk; Robert Arnold; Chris Feudtner Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 5.576