Sam Farley1, Simran Bansal1, Mary Carol Barks1,2, Kathryn I Pollak3,4, Erica C Kaye5, Anna Quarles2, Kathleen Briglia2, Erika Johnson2, Kristen Lakis2,6, Monica E Lemmon2,3. 1. Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 2. Department of Pediatrics and Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 3. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 4. Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. 5. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA. 6. Division of Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
Background: Communication challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit include fragmented communication, challenges managing expectations amidst uncertainty, and navigating complex medical information. Social workers are well suited to mitigate these challenges. Objective: In this study, we aimed to characterize the extent and nature of social worker participation in family conferences for critically ill infants. Design: We used a longitudinal observational mixed-methods design, enrolling infants with a neurological condition, their parent(s), and their clinicians. All audio-recorded conferences were transcribed and de-identified. Emergent themes and subthemes were identified using conventional content analysis. Results: We enrolled 40 infants and 61 parents. Sixty-eight conferences were held and audio recorded for 24 infants. Social workers were present for 51 of these conferences (n = 51/68, 75%) across 18 cases (n = 18/24, 75%). We identified four themes, conceptualized as distinct roles played by social workers in family conferences: (1) Translator: social workers served as a communicative bridge between parents and the medical team; (2) Coordinator: social workers simplified logistics and connected parents to community resources, including home health agencies and financial assistance; (3) Expectation manager: social workers provided anticipatory guidance and helped parents conceptualize the remainder of the hospital stay, discharge, and life at home; and (4) Advocate: social workers validated parental values and concerns and provided immediate emotional support. Conclusions: Social workers participated in three-quarters of family conferences for critically ill infants. When they participated, they facilitated communication, coordinated care, managed expectations, and advocated for families. These findings underscore the important, varied, and concurrent roles social workers play in the care of critically ill infants. Future communication and family support interventions should leverage these distinct roles.
Background: Communication challenges in the neonatal intensive care unit include fragmented communication, challenges managing expectations amidst uncertainty, and navigating complex medical information. Social workers are well suited to mitigate these challenges. Objective: In this study, we aimed to characterize the extent and nature of social worker participation in family conferences for critically ill infants. Design: We used a longitudinal observational mixed-methods design, enrolling infants with a neurological condition, their parent(s), and their clinicians. All audio-recorded conferences were transcribed and de-identified. Emergent themes and subthemes were identified using conventional content analysis. Results: We enrolled 40 infants and 61 parents. Sixty-eight conferences were held and audio recorded for 24 infants. Social workers were present for 51 of these conferences (n = 51/68, 75%) across 18 cases (n = 18/24, 75%). We identified four themes, conceptualized as distinct roles played by social workers in family conferences: (1) Translator: social workers served as a communicative bridge between parents and the medical team; (2) Coordinator: social workers simplified logistics and connected parents to community resources, including home health agencies and financial assistance; (3) Expectation manager: social workers provided anticipatory guidance and helped parents conceptualize the remainder of the hospital stay, discharge, and life at home; and (4) Advocate: social workers validated parental values and concerns and provided immediate emotional support. Conclusions: Social workers participated in three-quarters of family conferences for critically ill infants. When they participated, they facilitated communication, coordinated care, managed expectations, and advocated for families. These findings underscore the important, varied, and concurrent roles social workers play in the care of critically ill infants. Future communication and family support interventions should leverage these distinct roles.
Entities:
Keywords:
communication; decision making; neonate; quality of life; social worker; support
Authors: Lamia M Soghier; Katherine I Kritikos; Cara L Carty; Penny Glass; Lisa K Tuchman; Randi Streisand; Karen R Fratantoni Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Renee D Boss; Pamela K Donohue; Susan M Larson; Robert M Arnold; Debra L Roter Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Monica E Lemmon; Hannah C Glass; Renée A Shellhaas; Mary Carol Barks; Simran Bansal; Dana Annis; Jennifer L Guerriero; Betsy Pilon; Courtney J Wusthoff; Taeun Chang; Janet S Soul; Catherine J Chu; Cameron Thomas; Shavonne L Massey; Nicholas S Abend; Stephanie Rau; Elizabeth E Rogers; Linda S Franck Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Margaret H Barlet; Mary C Barks; Peter A Ubel; J Kelly Davis; Kathryn I Pollak; Erica C Kaye; Kevin P Weinfurt; Monica E Lemmon Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-10-03