Literature DB >> 15241092

Family satisfaction with family conferences about end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: increased proportion of family speech is associated with increased satisfaction.

Jonathan R McDonagh1, Tricia B Elliott, Ruth A Engelberg, Patsy D Treece, Sarah E Shannon, Gordon D Rubenfeld, Donald L Patrick, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Family members of critically ill patients report dissatisfaction with family-clinician communication about withdrawing life support, yet limited data exist to guide clinicians in this communication. The hypothesis of this analysis was that increased proportion of family speech during ICU family conferences would be associated with increased family satisfaction.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: We identified family conferences in intensive care units of four Seattle hospitals during which discussions about withdrawing life support were likely to occur. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 214 family members from 51 different families. There were 36 different physicians leading the conferences, as some physicians led more than one conference.
INTERVENTIONS: Fifty-one conferences were audiotaped. MEASUREMENTS: We measured the duration of time that families and clinicians spoke during the conference. All participants were given a survey assessing satisfaction with communication.
RESULTS: The mean conference time was 32.0 mins with an sd of 14.8 mins and a range from 7 to 74 mins. On average, family members spoke 29% and clinicians spoke 71% of the time. Increased proportion of family speech was significantly associated with increased family satisfaction with physician communication. Increased proportion of family speech was also associated with decreased family ratings of conflict with the physician. There was no association between the duration of the conference and family satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that allowing family members more opportunity to speak during conferences may improve family satisfaction. Future studies should assess the effect of interventions to increase listening by critical care clinicians on the quality of communication and the family experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15241092     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000127262.16690.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  110 in total

Review 1.  Integration of palliative care in chronic critical illness management.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Aluko A Hope
Journal:  Respir Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.258

2.  Development and evaluation of an interprofessional communication intervention to improve family outcomes in the ICU.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Paul S Ciechanowski; Lois Downey; Julia Gold; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Jessica P Young; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 3.  [Decision conflicts with relatives in the intensive care unit].

Authors:  M Ratliff; J-O Neumann
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

4.  End-of-life practice in Belgium and the new euthanasia law.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  The pressure to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining therapy from critically ill patients in the United States.

Authors:  John M Luce; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 21.405

6.  Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Natalie C Ernecoff; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Shannon S Carson; Catherine L Hough; J Randall Curtis; Wendy G Anderson; Jay Steingrub; Bernard Lo; Michael Matthay; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  What medical futility means to clinicians.

Authors:  Mark R Tonelli
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-03

8.  Alterations during medical interpretation of ICU family conferences that interfere with or enhance communication.

Authors:  Kiemanh Pham; J Daryl Thornton; Ruth A Engelberg; J Carey Jackson; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Investigating conflict in ICUs-is the clinicians' perspective enough?

Authors:  Rachel A Schuster; Seo Yeon Hong; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.598

10.  Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice L Gray; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Shannon S Carson; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.