| Literature DB >> 30875931 |
Kohei Fujimori1, Toshiki Yoneda2, Takaaki Tomofuji3, Daisuke Ekuni4, Tetsuji Azuma5, Takayuki Maruyama6, Hirofumi Mizuno7, Yoshio Sugiura8, Manabu Morita9.
Abstract
The purpose of this cross-sectional pilot study was to find salivary microRNAs (miRNAs) reflecting periodontal condition in chronic periodontitis. One hundred and twenty chronic periodontitis patients (mean age, 68.4 years) participated in the study, from whom unstimulated whole saliva was collected. A multiphase study was conducted to explore salivary miRNAs as biomarkers of periodontitis. At first, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) array was performed to compare salivary miRNAs profiles in no and mild (no/mild) and severe periodontitis patients. Next, the relative expression of salivary miRNAs on individual samples was assessed by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. The numbers (%) of patients were 26 (21.6%, no/mild), 58 (48.3%, moderate) and 36 (30.0%, severe), respectively. Among 84 miRNAs, only the relative expression of hsa-miR-381-3p in the severe periodontitis group was significantly higher than that of the no/mild periodontitis group (p < 0.05). Among the 120 patients, there was also a significant correlation between the relative expression of hsa-miR-381-3p and the mean probing pocket depth (PPD) (r = 0.181, p < 0.05). Salivary hsa-miR-381-3p was correlated with periodontitis condition in chronic periodontitis patients.Entities:
Keywords: microRNA; periodontitis; saliva
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30875931 PMCID: PMC6470766 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24061034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Characteristics of the participants (n [%] or mean [SD]).
| Variables | Categories | Total | Severity of Periodontitis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No/Mild | Moderate | Severe | ||||
| (N = 26) | (N = 58) | (N = 36) | ||||
| Age (years) | 68.4 (10.2) | 63.3 (13.9) | 68.6 (8.7) | 71.7 (7.9) | 0.005 * | |
| Gender | Male | 38 (31.7) | 6 (23.1) | 18 (31.0) | 14 (38.9) | 0.414 † |
| Number of teeth present | 23.6 (5.0) | 25.5 (3.7) | 24.3 (4.3) | 21.0 (6.0) | <0.001 * | |
| Mean PPD (mm) | 2.0 (0.4) | 1.9 (0.2) | 2.0 (0.3) | 2.3 (0.5) | <0.001 * | |
| Mean CAL (mm) | 2.8 (1.2) | 1.9 (0.2) | 2.6 (0.7) | 3.9 (1.4) | <0.001 * | |
| BOP (%) | 7.7 (9.0) | 6.9 (9.2) | 5.8 (4.9) | 11.3 (12.7) | 0.015 * | |
| Plaque control record (%) | 22.2 (20.3) | 18.1 (14.7) | 24.0 (20.3) | 22.3 (24.0) | 0.486 * | |
| Smoking status | Current | 6 (5.0) | 0 (0) | 2 (3.4) | 4 (11.1) | 0.109 † |
| BMI | 22.5 (3.0) | 22.0 (2.7) | 22.2 (2.7) | 23.3 (3.3) | 0.162 * | |
| Diabetes mellitus | Present | 12 (10.0) | 2 (7.7) | 8 (13.8) | 3 (5.6) | 0.392 † |
| Frequency of toothbrushing/day | 2.5 (0.7) | 2.6 (0.6) | 2.3 (0.7) | 2.7 (0.8) | 0.052 * | |
* one-way analysis of variance. † Chi-square test. PPD, probing pocket depth; CAL, clinical attachment level; BOP, bleeding on probing; BMI, body mass index.
List of the differentially expressed miRNAs between severe and no/mild periodontitis (Fold Change >2 or < 0.5).
| miRNAs | Average Ct | Average ⊿Ct | Average 2^-⊿Ct | Fold Change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No/Mild | Severe | No/Mild | Severe | no/Mild | Severe | |||
| hsa-miR-381-3p | 34.88 | 33.05 | 2.35 | 0.49 | 0.20 | 0.71 | 3.63 | 0.01 |
| hsa-miR-543 | 34.89 | 33.48 | 2.36 | 0.92 | 0.20 | 0.53 | 2.70 | 0.12 |
| hsa-miR-144-3p | 33.92 | 32.84 | 1.39 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 0.82 | 2.16 | 0.51 |
| hsa-miR-30b-5p | 30.05 | 31.32 | −2.48 | −1.24 | 5.57 | 2.36 | 0.42 | 0.14 |
| housekeeping small RNA | 32.53 | 32.56 | ||||||
Fold-change values greater than one indicate up-regulation and less than one indicate down-regulation. Average ⊿Ct = Average Ct (miRNA) − Average ⊿Ct (housekeeping small RNA). Fold change = 2^ (-Average⊿Ct (severe))/2^ (-Average⊿Ct (no/mild)). Average Ct values of housekeeping small RNAs mean average Ct of SNORD61, SNORD68, SNORD95, SNORD96A and RNU6-6p. The p value was calculated by the Student’s t-test.
Figure 1Relative expression of hsa-miR-381-3p and clinical parameters (A: mean PPD, B: mean CAL, C: BOP, and D: Plaque control record) using Pearson’s correlation coefficients between. N: number, r: Pearson’s correlation coefficients, p: p value. The relative expression of hsa-miR-381-3p was normalized by log10 transformation for the analysis.
Multiple linear regression analysis with mean PPD as the dependent variable (N = 120).
| Variables | B (95%CI) | β | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.917 | (1.760, 2.073) | - | <0.001 | - |
| BOP | 0.014 | (0.008, 0.021) | 0.353 | <0.001 | 1.036 |
| Gender | −0.148 | (−0.279, −0.017) | −0.187 | 0.027 | 1.036 |
| hsa-miR-381-3p | 0.054 | (0.010, 0.123) | 0.166 | 0.049 | 1.022 |
The candidate variables for the model were age, gender, BOP (%), Plaque control record (%), number of teeth present, and hsa-miR-381-3p. We selected candidate valuables which have significantly correlated with mean PPD in Pearson’s correlation analysis (p < 0.05). The final model was constructed based on the maximum adjusted R-squared and VIF less than 10. The F-statistic was 10.392 (p < 0.001), the R-squared was 0.212, and the adjusted R-squared was 0.191. N: number. CI: confidence interval. B: unstandardized regression coefficient. β: standardized coefficient. VIF: variance inflation factor. PPD: probing pocket depth. BOP: bleeding on probing.
Pathway analysis of target genes for hsa-miR-381-3p.
| Pathway | Target Genes | |
|---|---|---|
| Pathways in cancer | 1.02 × 10−12 | |
| Focal adhesion | 1.48 × 10−9 | |
| Wnt signaling pathway | 2.90 × 10−9 | |
| MAPK signaling pathway | 6.83 × 10−8 | |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 6.94 × 10−8 | |
| Insulin signaling pathway | 1.01 × 10−7 | |
| Ubiquitin mediated proteolysis | 1.17 × 10−7 | |
| ErbB signaling pathway | 1.86 × 10−7 | |
| Long-term potentiation | 1.97 × 10−7 | |
| Axon guidance | 6.88 × 10−7 |
Multiple bioinformatics databases including TargetScan, miRanda, and miRWalk were used. Predicted targets were included in three databases. We used Genecodis 3.0 to predict related signaling pathways of these predicted target genes.
Figure 2An overview of the experimental design.