| Literature DB >> 26370963 |
Tatsuya Machida1, Takaaki Tomofuji2,3, Daisuke Ekuni4, Takayuki Maruyama5, Toshiki Yoneda6, Yuya Kawabata7, Hirofumi Mizuno8, Hisataka Miyai9, Muneyoshi Kunitomo10, Manabu Morita11.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to examine whether salivary exosomal miRNAs could be identified as aging biomarkers. Fifteen young healthy volunteers (median age, 21.0 years) and 13 old individuals (median age, 66.0 years) were recruited. Unstimulated whole saliva was collected, salivary exosomes were isolated, and total RNA was extracted. In a microarray, 242 miRNAs were commonly detected in these two mixed samples. Based on the cut-off values of 2- or 0.5-fold changes (FC) and regulatory power for aging process, six candidate miRNAs (miR-24-3p, miR-371a-5p, miR-3175, miR-3162-5p, miR-671-5p, and miR-4667-5p) were selected. After comparing each total RNA obtained by the 15 young and 13 old individuals to validate the FC values using quantitative real-time PCR, miR-24-3p was identified as a novel candidate aging biomarker. This pilot study suggested that salivary exosomal miRNAs could be identified as candidate aging biomarkers. To confirm whether miR-24-3p in salivary exosomes are suitable biomarkers of aging, further validation research is required.Entities:
Keywords: aging; exosome; microRNA; saliva
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26370963 PMCID: PMC4613253 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160921294
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Characteristics of young and old groups (median (25th, 75th percentile) or N (%)).
| Variables | Categories | Young (N = 15) | Old (N = 13) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | - | 21.0 | (21.0, 26.0) | 66.0 | (61.5, 72.5) | <0.001 * |
| Male (%) | - | 8 | (53.3) | 6 | (46.2) | 0.705 † |
| BMI | - | 20.6 | (20.1, 21.3) | 22.4 | (20.7, 24.3) | 0.058 * |
| Salivary flow rate (ml/min) | - | 0.32 | (0.17, 0.90) | 0.29 | (0.17, 0.49) | 0.363 * |
| Number of teeth presents | - | 29.0 | (28.0, 30.0) | 27.0 | (23.5, 28.0) | <0.001 * |
| PPD (mm) | - | 2.04 | (1.72, 2.10) | 1.82 | (1.66, 2.12) | 0.496 * |
| CAL (mm) | - | 2.04 | (1.72, 2.10) | 2.04 | (1.71, 2.18) | 0.717 * |
| BOP (%) | <20 | 11 | (73.3) | 12 | (92.3) | 0.333 ‡ |
| - | ≥20 | 4 | (26.7) | 1 | (7.7) | - |
| PCR | <20 | 6 | (40.0) | 11 | (84.6) | 0.016 † |
| - | ≥20 | 9 | (60.0) | 2 | (15.4) | - |
* Mann-Whitney U test; † Chi-square test; ‡ Fischer’s exact test; N: number; BMI: body mass index; PPD: probing pocket depth; CAL: clinical attachment level; BOP: bleeding on probing; PCR: plaque control record.
List of the differentially expressed miRNAs between young and old groups.
| (A) Increased Expression ( | (B) Decreased Expression ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| miRNAs | NOD * | miRNAs | NOD * | ||
| miR-1343-3p | 5.75 | 0 | miR-1273e | 0.19 | 0 |
| miR-4725-3p | 5.02 | 0 | miR-7108-5p | 0.24 | 0 |
| miR-7106-5p | 4.68 | 0 | miR-6075 | 0.27 | 0 |
| 4.42 | 12 | miR-4467 | 0.27 | 0 | |
| miR-6891-5p | 4.08 | 0 | miR-6127 | 0.28 | 0 |
| miR-365a-5p | 3.70 | 1 | miR-1254 | 0.31 | 2 |
| miR-6809-5p | 3.65 | 0 | miR-6828-5p | 0.33 | 0 |
| 3.58 | 15 | miR-6859-5p | 0.33 | 0 | |
| miR-6875-5p | 3.55 | 0 | miR-4486 | 0.38 | 1 |
| miR-6824-5p | 3.52 | 0 | 0.41 | 7 | |
| miR-4534 | 3.46 | 2 | miR-638 | 0.41 | 0 |
| miR-8059 | 3.37 | 0 | miR-8069 | 0.42 | 0 |
| miR-6802-5p | 3.18 | 0 | miR-6724-5p | 0.42 | 0 |
| miR-3610 | 3.18 | 1 | miR-6791-5p | 0.42 | 0 |
| 3.14 | 4 | miR-3180-3p | 0.42 | 0 | |
| miR-7150 | 3.12 | 0 | miR-4734 | 0.44 | 2 |
| 3.11 | 5 | miR-939-5p | 0.44 | 0 | |
| miR-6800-5p | 3.04 | 0 | miR-3928-3p | 0.44 | 0 |
| miR-6768-5p | 2.89 | 0 | miR-1908-5p | 0.46 | 0 |
| miR-4722-5p | 2.80 | 0 | miR-4740-3p | 0.46 | 0 |
| miR-6131 | 2.75 | 0 | miR-6729-5p | 0.47 | 0 |
| miR-6124 | 2.58 | 0 | miR-3665 | 0.49 | 2 |
| miR-6774-5p | 2.35 | 0 | miR-7846-3p | 0.49 | 0 |
| miR-6779-5p | 2.32 | 0 | miR-4787-5p | 0.49 | 0 |
| miR-6076 | 2.27 | 0 | - | - | - |
| 2.23 | 6 | - | - | - | |
| miR-4706 | 2.19 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-7111-5p | 2.16 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-642b-3p | 2.12 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-128-2-5p | 2.12 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-1238-5p | 2.11 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-7847-3p | 2.08 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-1469 | 2.05 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-7641 | 2.04 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-6808-5p | 2.04 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-6726-5p | 2.02 | 0 | - | - | - |
| miR-4428 | 2.01 | 0 | - | - | - |
* NOD represents modified novel out degree that calculated by using commonly detected miRNAs and age-related pathways; FC: fold change of miRNAs for old group using young group as reference. The miRNAs with ≥4 NOD (novel out degree) are represented in bold.
Figure 1Comparison of relative expression rates of candidate miRNAs for aging biomarker between young and old groups. We performed TaqMan RT-qPCR to calculate the relative expression rates of three candidate miRNAs between young and old groups. We used miR-4739 as internal control miRNA. Circle plots represent relative expression rates of each sample. The horizontal lines within each box represent the 25, 50 and 75th percentiles. The p value was calculated by the Pair Wise Fixed Reallocation Randomisation Test using REST 2009 software. * p value < 0.05. N: number of samples. Y: samples of young group. O: samples of old group.
Correlation between clinical parameters and relative expression rates for miR-24-3p.
| Variables | Young (N = 15) | Old (N = 13) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | −0.257 | 0.354 | 0.569 | 0.042 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.005 | 0.985 | 0.071 | 0.817 |
| Salivary flow rate (mL/min) | 0.191 | 0.494 | −0.737 | 0.004 |
| Number of teeth presents | −0.155 | 0.582 | 0.187 | 0.540 |
| PPD (mm) | 0.163 | 0.562 | 0.692 | 0.009 |
| CAL (mm) | 0.163 | 0.562 | 0.687 | 0.010 |
| BOP (%) | −0.271 | 0.328 | 0.615 | 0.025 |
| PCR (%) | −0.220 | 0.431 | 0.209 | 0.494 |
* Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between each variable and relative expression rates for miR-24-3p using miR-4739 as reference; N: number; BMI: body mass index; PPD: probing pocket depth; CAL: clinical attachment level; BOP: bleeding on probing; PCR: plaque control record.
Multiple linear regression analysis with the relative expression rates of miR-24-3p as the dependent variable in old group (N = 13).
| Variables | B (95% CI) | β | VIF | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −1.41 | (−9.19, 6.38) | - | 0.696 | - |
| Salivary flow rate (mL/min) | −5.52 | (−10.32, −0.73) | −0.47 | 0.028 | 1.155 |
| PPD (mm) | 5.07 | (1.33, 8.82) | 0.55 | 0.013 | 1.155 |
We used stepwise method (entry, p = 0.05; removal, p = 0.1) to construct the model. The candidate variables for the model were age, salivary flow rate, PPD, CAL, and BOP (%). The final model was constructed based on the maximum adjusted R-squared and VIF less than 10. The F-statistic was 12.344 (p = 0.002), the R-squared was 0.712, and the adjusted R-squared was 0.654. N: number; CI: confidence interval; B: unstandardized regression coefficient; β: standardized coefficient; VIF: variance inflation factor; PPD: probing pocket depth; CAL: clinical attachment level; BOP: bleeding on probing.
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for detection of old group in all participants (A); participants with low salivary flow rate (B); and participants with high probing pocket depth (C). The circle plots represent the sensitivity and specificity with optimal threshold value determined by the maximum Youden index (sensitivity + specificity − 1).
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis using expression rates of miR-24-3p to detect for old group.
| Groups | Relative Expression Rates of miR-24-3p * | Young Group | Old Group | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All group | High | (≥5.105) | 3 (20.0) | 8 (61.5) | 0.672 | 0.123 | 0.615 | 0.800 |
| Low | (<5.105) | 12 (80.0) | 5 (38.5) | - | - | - | - | |
| Low (<0.31(mL/min)) salivary flow rate group ‡ | High | (≥4.930) | 1 (14.3) | 7 (100.0) | 0.959 | 0.004 | 1.000 | 0.857 |
| Low | (<4.930) | 6 (85.7) | 0 (0.0) | - | - | - | - | |
| High (≥2.01 (mm)) PPD group ‡ | High | (≥5.805) | 1 (11.1) | 5 (100.0) | 0.978 | 0.004 | 1.000 | 0.889 |
| Low | (<5.805) | 8 (88.9) | 0 (0.0) | - | - | - | - | |
* Relative expression rates of miR-24-3p normalized by log2 transformation were categorized by each optimal threshold value determined by the maximum Youden index (sensitivity + specificity − 1); † Nonparametric AUC estimation was conducted and the p value for testing AUC = 0.5 versus AUC ≠ 0.5 was calculated; ‡ Each of low salivary flow rate group and high PPD group was categorized by median of salivary flow rate and PPD, respectively. AUC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve. PPD: probing pocket depth.
Enrichment analysis for biological processes and pathways of unique target genes of miR-24-3p.
| Response to organic substance | 0010033 | 5 | 2.0 × 10−3 | 4.8 × 10−1 |
| Positive regulation of multicellular organismal process | 0051240 | 3 | 1.6 × 10−2 | 9.3 × 10−1 |
| Immune response | 0006955 | 4 | 1.6 × 10−2 | 8.3 × 10−1 |
| Activation of pro-apoptotic gene products | 0008633 | 2 | 1.8 × 10−2 | 7.7 × 10−1 |
| Regulation of apoptosis | 0042981 | 4 | 2.4 × 10−2 | 8.0 × 10−1 |
| Regulation of programmed cell death | 0043067 | 4 | 2.5 × 10−2 | 7.5 × 10−1 |
| Regulation of cell death | 0010941 | 4 | 2.5 × 10−2 | 7.0 × 10−1 |
| Induction of apoptosis | 0006915 | 3 | 2.7 × 10−2 | 6.8 × 10−1 |
| Induction of programmed cell death | 0012502 | 3 | 2.7 × 10−2 | 6.3 × 10−1 |
| Regulation of cell cycle | 0051726 | 3 | 2.8 × 10−2 | 6.2 × 10−1 |
| Positive regulation of apoptosis | 0043065 | 3 | 4.6 × 10−2 | 7.6 × 10−1 |
| Positive regulation of programmed cell death | 0043068 | 3 | 4.6 × 10−2 | 7.3 × 10−1 |
| Positive regulation of cell death | 0010942 | 3 | 4.7 × 10−2 | 7.1 × 10−1 |
| Cell proliferation | 0008283 | 3 | 4.7 × 10−2 | 6.8 × 10−1 |
| MAPK signaling pathway | hsa04010 | 10 | 1.3 × 10−10 | 5.6 × 10−9 |
| Apoptosis | hsa04210 | 3 | 1.4 × 10−2 | 2.6 × 10−1 |
| Pathways in cancer | hsa05200 | 4 | 3.0 × 10−2 | 3.4 × 10−1 |
The gene set including MYC, TCF7, IL1R1, TAB2, FASLG, TAOK1, FGF11, HSPA8, IL1A, SRF, RAP1B, and CRH was analyzed using DAVID online software. * The p value was calculated by DAVID online software with a modified Fisher’s Exact Test (EASE Score); † Benjamini-Hochberg multiple testing correction on the p values. GO: gene ontology.