Literature DB >> 2747307

Quality of life and care in leukemia, myeloma and non-malignant disease. Opinions of patients and relatives, and effects of geography and time.

E Osby1, P Reizenstein.   

Abstract

In a questionnaire study 140 subjects answered 4200 questions in 1980 and 1986. They consisted of patients with myeloma, acute leukemia, lung carcinoma, and non-malignant disease and their relatives. In 22 additional cases the questionnaire was not answered. The results show that myeloma patients are less content with the general care than leukemia patients (P less than 0.05). Similarly, relatives of decreased myeloma patients are less satisfied with the information given to them than relatives of deceased leukemia patients (P less than 0.001). The information has improved with time, however, since the patients were more satisfied in 1986 than in 1980 (P less than 0.001) and relatives of myeloma patients still alive were more satisfied than relatives of patients who had died earlier (P less than 0.001). The opinions of patients were similar to those of their relatives. However, the relatives of leukemia patients were even more satisfied with the contact with the medical staff than the patients themselves (P less than 0.05). As many as 10-30% of the relatives never gave up hope for their relative's survival. Only two out of 27 deaths were considered not dignified. The lung carcinoma patients reported a less good quality of life (P less than 0.001), and less satisfaction with the information given (P less than 0.01), than the hematological patients from the same year. Similarly, their attitude to the medical care improved less (P less than 0.01), and they were less content with the general care than the leukemia group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2747307     DOI: 10.1007/bf02985236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother        ISSN: 0736-0118


  25 in total

1.  Consumer satisfaction with prepaid group practice: a comparative study.

Authors:  R Tessler; D Mechanic
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1975-03

2.  Assessing patient satisfaction in long-term care institutions.

Authors:  R Y Pablo
Journal:  Hosp Adm Can       Date:  1975-03

3.  Quality of life in cancer patients.

Authors:  P Reizenstein
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1986

4.  A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; V F Hillier
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 7.723

5.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: a concise QL-index for use by physicians.

Authors:  W O Spitzer; A J Dobson; J Hall; E Chesterman; J Levi; R Shepherd; R N Battista; B R Catchlove
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1981

6.  Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.

Authors:  H Schipper; J Clinch; A McMurray; M Levitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Cancer patients' insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies.

Authors:  R N Eidinger; D V Schapira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The effects of antihypertensive therapy on the quality of life.

Authors:  S H Croog; S Levine; M A Testa; B Brown; C J Bulpitt; C D Jenkins; G L Klerman; G H Williams
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-06-26       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials.

Authors:  P H Sugarbaker; I Barofsky; S A Rosenberg; F J Gianola
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  A measure of primary sociobiological functions.

Authors:  S Katz; C A Akpom
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.663

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.