Literature DB >> 7729325

Goals of antihypertensive therapy.

G E McVeigh1, J Flack, R Grimm.   

Abstract

Antihypertensive therapy has been used for almost 40 years to reduce blood pressure and to prevent morbidity and mortality related to the hypertensive state. Cardiovascular events are related to the initial elevation of blood pressure; the benefits of treating malignant, severe or moderate hypertension are well established. Although large scale clinical trials have demonstrated a decrease in morbid events when mildly elevated blood pressures is treated, the benefits are neither universal or dramatic and treatment is certainly less cost effective than no treatment. Recently it has been emphasised that the absolute risk of cardiovascular events is determined only in part by blood pressure, and that it is also influenced by age, gender, race and the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors. For example, in older individuals where the absolute risk of vascular complications is greater than in younger individuals for any given level of blood pressure, the benefits of therapy will be greater. It has been suggested that in younger individuals with mild hypertension and a low absolute risk of developing cardiovascular morbid events it may be more appropriate to monitor the effects of drug therapy on measures of cardiac and vascular damage that are associated with the hypertensive state. Drug therapy has been shown to be extremely effective in reducing the incidence of stroke, congestive cardiac failure and renal failure associated with elevated blood pressure. Meta-analysis of randomised large scale clinical trials indicates that drug therapy may not reduce coronary events to the extent expected in patients with hypertension. One plausible explanation is that the trials have been of insufficient duration to detect the benefit of blood pressure lowering on coronary heart disease. It has also been suggested that certain adverse metabolic effects associated with the use of thiazide diuretics and beta-blockers employed in these trials may have partially offset the benefits of blood pressure reduction. However, the clinical significance of these drug-induced metabolic disturbances remains unclear. Experimental data suggesting differences in the ability of antihypertensive drugs to inhibit atherosclerosis in animal models are also of interest, but again the relation of the findings to the clinical situation is unknown. Thiazide diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and alpha-blockers can produce regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). While LVH is clearly a strong and independent predictor for coronary disease, it remains to be shown that a lower risk for coronary morbid events exists in patients whose LVH has undergone regression over and above that attributable to blood pressure reduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7729325     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199549020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  127 in total

1.  Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in treated hypertensive patients with dilevalol and metoprolol--a double blind randomized study.

Authors:  S P Glasser; D K Koehn; R Powell
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.126

2.  The beta-blocker heart attack trial. beta-Blocker Heart Attack Study Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension. Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP). SHEP Cooperative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-06-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hypertension management in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT). Six-year intervention results for men in special intervention and usual care groups.

Authors:  R H Grimm; J D Cohen; W M Smith; L Falvo-Gerard; J D Neaton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-07

5.  Cardiovascular risk and risk factors in a randomized trial of treatment based on the beta-blocker oxprenolol: the International Prospective Primary Prevention Study in Hypertension (IPPPSH). The IPPPSH Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  beta-blockers or diuretics in hypertension? A six year follow-up of blood pressure and metabolic side effects.

Authors:  G Berglund; O Andersson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-04-04       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  The cardiovascular effects of alpha-receptor blocking agents.

Authors:  P Leren
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1992-06

8.  1993 guidelines for the management of mild hypertension. Memorandum from a World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension meeting. Guidelines Subcommittee of the WHO/ISH Mild Hypertension Liaison Committee.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  The Trial of Antihypertensive Interventions and Management (TAIM) Study. Final results with regard to blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, and quality of life.

Authors:  S Wassertheil-Smoller; A Oberman; M D Blaufox; B Davis; H Langford
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.689

10.  Prognostic value of serum creatinine and effect of treatment of hypertension on renal function. Results from the hypertension detection and follow-up program. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group.

Authors:  N B Shulman; C E Ford; W D Hall; M D Blaufox; D Simon; H G Langford; K A Schneider
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Management of the hypertensive patient who smokes.

Authors:  H Pardell; R Tresserras; E Saltó; P Armario; R Hernández
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Calcium antagonists in the elderly. A risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  J B Schwartz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Safety and tolerability of eprosartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide.

Authors:  Michael Böhm; Alisia Sachse
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.