| Literature DB >> 30873145 |
Dhara Y Freitas1, Susana Araújo2, Adriana R C Folador1, Rommel T J Ramos1, Juliana S N Azevedo3, Marta Tacão2, Artur Silva1, Isabel Henriques2, Rafael A Baraúna1.
Abstract
Aquatic systems have been described as antibiotic resistance reservoirs, where water may act as a vehicle for the spread of resistant bacteria and resistance genes. We evaluated the occurrence and diversity of third generation cephalosporin-resistant gram-negative bacteria in a lake in the Amazonia region. This water is used for human activities, including consumption after appropriate treatment. Eighteen samples were obtained from six sites in October 2014. Water quality parameters were generally within the legislation limits. Thirty-three bacterial isolates were identified as Escherichia (n = 7 isolates), Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, and Klebsiella (n = 5 each), Pseudomonas (n = 4), Shigella (n = 3), and Chromobacterium, Citrobacter, Leclercia, Phytobacter (1 isolate each). Twenty nine out of 33 isolates (88%) were resistant to most beta-lactams, except carbapenems, and 88% (n = 29) were resistant to antibiotics included in at least three different classes. Among the beta-lactamase genes inspected, the bla CTX-M was the most prevalent (n = 12 positive isolates), followed by bla TEM (n = 5) and bla SHV (n = 4). bla CTX-M-15 (n = 5), bla CTX-M-14 (n = 1) and bla CTX-M-2 (n = 1) variants were detected in conserved genomic contexts: bla CTX-M-15 flanked by ISEcp1 and Orf477; bla CTX-M-14 flanked by ISEcp1 and IS903; and bla CTX-M-2 associated to an ISCR element. For 4 strains the transfer of bla CTX-M was confirmed by conjugation assays. Compared with the recipient, the transconjugants showed more than 500-fold increases in the MICs of cefotaxime and 16 to 32-fold increases in the MICs of ceftazidime. Two isolates (Escherichia coli APC43A and Acinetobacter baumannii APC25) were selected for whole genome analysis. APC43A was predicted as a E. coli pathogen of the high-risk clone ST471 and serotype O154:H18. bla CTX-M-15 as well as determinants related to efflux of antibiotics, were noted in APC43A genome. A. baumannii APC25 was susceptible to carbapenems and antibiotic resistance genes detected in its genome were intrinsic determinants (e.g., bla OXA-208 and bla ADC-like). The strain was not predicted as a human pathogen and belongs to a new sequence type. Operons related to metal resistance were predicted in both genomes as well as pathogenicity and resistance islands. Results suggest a high dissemination of ESBL-producing bacteria in Lake Água Preta which, although not presenting characteristics of a strongly impacted environment, contains multi-drug resistant pathogenic strains.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; Escherichia coli; antibiotic resistance; blaCTX–M; whole genome analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 30873145 PMCID: PMC6403167 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Map of the Utinga State Park (dark gray area). Sampling points are identified as S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. The urban area of Belém is represented by the gray area in the upper left half of the map. Therefore, the city is closer to the sampling points S1, S2, S5, and S6.
Characteristics of isolates obtained from Lake Água Preta.
| Isolate | 16S rRNA gene Affiliation | Resistance (and intermediate) phenotype | Resistance genotype | Integrase genes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APC43A | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, NAL (KAN)b | – | ||
| APC25 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, ATM, CIP, NAL (KAN) | –a | – | |
| APC4 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, ATM, CIP, NAL, SXT, TET (KAN) | – | – | |
| APC6 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, ATM, CTX, CIP, GEN, KAN, NAL, TET | – | ||
| APC11 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, ATM, CHL, NAL, SXT | – | ||
| APC13 | AML, AMP, CEF, CAZ, FEP, ATM (CTX, NAL) | – | – | |
| APC14 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, TET (NAL) | – | – | |
| APC15 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, IPM, ATM, KAN, NAL | – | – | |
| APC19 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET | |||
| APC20 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM (NAL) | – | – | |
| APC22 | AML, AMP, CEF, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, KAN, NAL, SXT (AMC) | |||
| APC24B | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET | |||
| APC28 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET (C) | |||
| APC32 | AML, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, SXT (AMC, CIP, KAN) | – | ||
| APC33 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, NAL | – | ||
| APC34 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET | |||
| APC38 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, CHL, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET | |||
| APC39 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, ATM, CIP, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET | – | – | |
| APC40A | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, CHL, NAL, SXT (KAN) | |||
| APC42 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET (CHL) | – | ||
| APC43B | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, KAN, NAL, SXT, TET (CHL) | – | ||
| API2 | AML, ATM, C, KAN, SXT, TET (AMP, CIP) | – | ||
| API3 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, CAZ, ATM, CHL, KAN, NAL, TET | – | – | |
| API4 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, SXT, TET (CTX, NAL) | – | ||
| API6 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, CHL, KAN, NAL, TET (CTX) | – | – | |
| API7 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF (CTX, ATM) | – | – | |
| API10 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, CHL, KAN, NAL (SXT, TET) | – | – | |
| API12 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, KAN, TET (NAL) | – | – | |
| API16 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, GEN, CHL, NAL, SXT, TET (CTX) | – | – | |
| API20 | AML, AMC, AMP, CEF, ATM, CIP, KAN, TET (CAZ, CTX, GEN, CHL) | – | – | |
| API24 | AMP, CAZ, CTX, ATM, KAN, NAL (AML, FEP, TET) | – | ||
| API29 | AML, AMP, CEF | – | ||
| API34 | AML, AMP, CEF, CTX, FEP, ATM, CIP, GEN, CHL, NAL, SXT, TET | – | – |
Major genomic features of two isolates from Lake Água Preta and resistance genes annotated by CARD and/or ResFinder.
| %GC | CDS | contigs | N50 | RIs | PAIs | Size (bp) | MLST | Serotype | Plasmids | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50.5 | 5923 | 195 | 3283348 | 5 | 25 | 5,035,455 | ST471 | O154:H18 | IncX4 e IncFIA | |
| Antibiotic inactivation enzyme; beta-lactam resistance proteins | 22_18911 | |||||||||
| intrinsic | ||||||||||
| Efflux pump conferring antibiotic resistance | 15_8461 | |||||||||
| 10_26638 | ||||||||||
| 5_4183 | ||||||||||
| 8_54031 | ||||||||||
| 11_125192 | ||||||||||
| 7_57761 | ||||||||||
| Efflux pump conferring antibiotic resistance; antibiotic resistance gene cluster, cassette, or operon | 37_5848 | |||||||||
| Efflux pump conferring antibiotic resistance; gene modulating antibiotic efflux | 15_10016 | |||||||||
| 19_63902 | ||||||||||
| 10_24793 | ||||||||||
| 20_22613 | ||||||||||
| 39.0 | 5063 | 121 | 244684 | 10 | 11 | 4,860,843 | –a | –a | –b | |
| Efflux pump complex or subunit conferring antibiotic resistance | 11_73107 | |||||||||
| Antibiotic inactivation enzyme; beta-lactam resistance protein | 23_160179 | |||||||||
| 6_85724 | ||||||||||
FIGURE 2Synteny analysis of ISEcp1 element carrying blaCTX–M–15 gene in Escherichia coli APC43A. Conserved genes are connected by lines. The pink arrow represents the ISEcp1 element that is described in detail at the bottom of the figure. E. coli APC43A contains two CDSs identified as MATE efflux family proteins flanking the IS element. These CDSs are complementary and probably are part of the same gene that was fragmented during the insertion of the IS element.
FIGURE 3Comparative genomic ring designed in Gegenees program. The innermost ring to the outermost is presented in this figure, as follows: GC skew and the GC content of E. coli APC43A; the genome sequence of E. coli APC43A and E. coli K-12; the Resistance Islands (RIs) detected by GIPSy; the Pathogenicity Islands (PAIs) detected by GIPSy; CDSs identified in the genome of E. coli APC43A. The location of the resistance genes detected by CARD and ResFinder are shown and identified by their respective names in red.
FIGURE 4Comparative genomic ring designed in Gegenees program. The innermost ring to the outermost is presented in this figure, as follows: GC skew and the GC content of Acinetobacter baumannii APC25; the genome sequence of A. baumannii APC25 and A. calcoacetius CA16; the Resistance Islands (RIs) detected by GIPSy; the Pathogenicity Islands (PAIs) detected by GIPSy; CDSs identified in the genome of A. baumannii APC25. The location of the resistance genes detected by CARD and ResFinder are shown and identified by their respective names in red.