| Literature DB >> 30872641 |
Roby P Bhattacharyya1,2, Mark Walker1, Rich Boykin3, Sophie S Son1, Jamin Liu1,4, Austin C Hachey1,5, Peijun Ma1, Lidan Wu1,6, Kyungyong Choi7, Kaelyn C Cummins8,9, Maura Benson8, Jennifer Skerry10, Hyunryul Ryu7,11, Sharon Y Wong1, Marcia B Goldberg2, Jongyoon Han7,12, Virginia M Pierce10, Lisa A Cosimi8, Noam Shoresh1, Jonathan Livny1, Joseph Beechem13, Deborah T Hung14,15,16.
Abstract
Rapid bacterial identification remains a critical challenge in infectious disease diagnostics. We developed a novel molecular approach to detect and identify a wide diversity of bacterial pathogens in a single, simple assay, exploiting the conservation, abundance, and rich phylogenetic content of ribosomal RNA in a rapid fluorescent hybridization assay that requires no amplification or enzymology. Of 117 isolates from 64 species across 4 phyla, this assay identified bacteria with >89% accuracy at the species level and 100% accuracy at the family level, enabling all critical clinical distinctions. In pilot studies on primary clinical specimens, including sputum, blood cultures, and pus, bacteria from 5 different phyla were identified.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30872641 PMCID: PMC6418090 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40792-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Normalized signal intensity of 180 Phirst-ID probes against a reference set of 117 strains. (a) Taxonomic classifications of the 117 strains tested (top). Black boxes indicate species for which multiple isolates were tested; white boxes indicate species for which a single isolate was available. Taxonomic levels not targeted in probeset design are shown in red. (Note: distances on the taxonomic diagram do not represent phylogenetic distances.) (b) Accuracy of identification at each taxonomic level based on highest non-self Pearson correlation coefficient (Rmax). Blue boxes indicate correct identification; orange boxes indicate mismatch; gray boxes indicate cases where no non-self match is possible within the test set. (c) Normalized intensity data from 180 probes displayed as a heatmap. Probes are displayed in the order listed in Table S2, with broad categories of intended targets indicated at left.
Figure 2Probeset reactivity patterns (PSRPs) convey identity and correlate with phylogeny. (a) All 116 non-self pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients (R) plotted for each of the 75 isolates from 22 species tested in replicate, colored by taxonomic relationship of the paired species. Order of species is the same as Fig. 1a (black boxes only). (b) Distributions of pairwise R values for species pairs at each indicated taxonomic relationship. Data from same species reflects only the isolates shown in (a); all other data reflects all 117 isolates (including species for which single isolates were available).
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering of strains based on PSRPs identifies clinically relevant pathogen subsets. Pearson correlation coefficients (R) for (a) Staphylococcus aureus vs non-aureus species; (b) Mycobacterium tuberculosis vs non-tuberculous mycobacteria; (c) Enterococcus faecalis vs. E. faecium; (d) Enterobacteriaceae vs non-enteric GNRs. Species not targeted in probeset design are labeled in red. Trees above reflect distances based upon unsupervised hierarchical clustering of (1-R), with the indicated scale at top left. Heatmaps below display each pairwise R value, with color scale at lower left. Strain order is the same on horizontal and vertical axes; self-correlations are included on the diagonal.
Figure 4Probeset performance in identifying pathogens from clinical samples. Accuracy of identification at each phylogenetic level based on Rmax compared with the reference set of 117 isolates for (a) sputum, (b) cultured blood, and (c) pus. Blue boxes indicate correct identification; orange boxes indicate mismatch; gray boxes indicate cases where no match is possible with the reference set at that taxonomic level. Each type of clinical sample is ordered by taxonomy of the pathogen identified by the clinical microbiology laboratory, listed below. Species not targeted in probeset design or included in the reference set are labeled in red. *Mixed sample, as described in main text. **All species-level errors amongst the non-aureus staphylococci involved mispairings with other non-aureus staphylococci, not with S. aureus.