Literature DB >> 30871767

Fertility treatment when the prognosis is very poor or futile: an Ethics Committee opinion.

.   

Abstract

The Ethics Committee recommends that in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers develop patient-centered policies regarding requests for futile treatment. In most cases, clear communication can avoid a direct conflict, but clinicians ethically may refuse to provide treatment believed to be futile or to carry a very poor prognosis. In certain instances, clinicians may provide limited treatment which they judge likely to be futile, but must be vigilant in their presentation of risks, benefits, and alternatives. This version replaces the previous published draft of this name (Fertil Steril 2012;98:e6-9).
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30871767     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.01.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

Review 1.  Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Carleigh B Nesbit; Misty Blanchette-Porter; Navid Esfandiari
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.357

2.  Modelling futility in the setting of fertility treatment.

Authors:  Alex Polyakov; Christopher Gyngel; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.353

3.  Intrauterine insemination cycles: prediction of success and thresholds for poor prognosis and futile care.

Authors:  Alessandra J Ainsworth; Emily P Barnard; Sarah C Baumgarten; Amy L Weaver; Zaraq Khan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  A validated prediction score for having two or more embryos for cryopreservation following freeze-all IVF cycles: an analysis utilizing SART CORS database.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Gregory J Stoddard; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Is there still a role for a cleavage-stage embryo transfer?

Authors:  Michael F Neblett; Tana Kim; Tiffanny L Jones; Sarah C Baumgarten; Charles C Coddington; Yulian Zhao; Chandra C Shenoy
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2021-06-29

6.  Prevalence and characteristics of patients declined from pursuing in vitro fertilization with autologous oocytes.

Authors:  Eduardo Hariton; Jerrine R Morris; Aileen Portugal; Jake Anderson-Bialis; Deborah Anderson-Bialis; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 3.357

7.  Post-warming embryo morphology is associated with live birth: a cohort study of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Meagan Allen; Lyndon Hale; Daniel Lantsberg; Violet Kieu; John Stevens; Catharyn Stern; David K Gardner; Yossi Mizrachi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Words Representing Numeric Probabilities in Medical Writing Are Ambiguous and Misinterpreted.

Authors:  Douglas E Ott
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.