Alessandra J Ainsworth1, Emily P Barnard2, Sarah C Baumgarten1, Amy L Weaver3, Zaraq Khan4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburg, PA, USA. 3. Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Khan.zaraq@mayo.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to define intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycle characteristics associated with viable birth, identify thresholds below which IUI treatments are consistent with very poor prognosis and futile care, and develop a nomogram for individualized application. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated couples using fresh partner ejaculate for IUI from January 2005 to September 2017. Variables included female age, semen characteristics, and ovarian stimulation type. Using cycle-level data, we evaluated the association of these characteristics with the probability of viable birth by fitting generalized regression models for a binary outcome with a logit link function, using generalized estimating equation methodology to account for the correlation between cycles involving the same patient. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1117 women with 2912 IUI cycles; viable birth was achieved in 275 (9.4%) cycles. Futile care (viable birth rate < 1%) was identified for women age > 43, regardless of stimulation type or inseminate motility (IM). Very poor prognosis (viable birth rate < 5%) was identified for women using oral medications or Clomid plus gonadotropins who were (1) age < 35 with IM < 49%, (2) age 35-37 with IM < 56%, or (3) age ≥ 38, and (4) women age ≥ 38 using gonadotropins only with IM < 60%. A clinical prediction model and nomogram was developed with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.611. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the impact of multiple clinical factors on IUI success, identifies criteria consistent with very poor prognosis and futile care, and provides a nomogram to individualize counseling regarding the probability of a viable birth.
PURPOSE: We aimed to define intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycle characteristics associated with viable birth, identify thresholds below which IUI treatments are consistent with very poor prognosis and futile care, and develop a nomogram for individualized application. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study evaluated couples using fresh partner ejaculate for IUI from January 2005 to September 2017. Variables included female age, semen characteristics, and ovarian stimulation type. Using cycle-level data, we evaluated the association of these characteristics with the probability of viable birth by fitting generalized regression models for a binary outcome with a logit link function, using generalized estimating equation methodology to account for the correlation between cycles involving the same patient. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 1117 women with 2912 IUI cycles; viable birth was achieved in 275 (9.4%) cycles. Futile care (viable birth rate < 1%) was identified for women age > 43, regardless of stimulation type or inseminate motility (IM). Very poor prognosis (viable birth rate < 5%) was identified for women using oral medications or Clomid plus gonadotropins who were (1) age < 35 with IM < 49%, (2) age 35-37 with IM < 56%, or (3) age ≥ 38, and (4) women age ≥ 38 using gonadotropins only with IM < 60%. A clinical prediction model and nomogram was developed with an optimism-corrected c-statistic of 0.611. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlights the impact of multiple clinical factors on IUI success, identifies criteria consistent with very poor prognosis and futile care, and provides a nomogram to individualize counseling regarding the probability of a viable birth.
Entities:
Keywords:
Futile care; Intrauterine insemination; Nomogram; Poor prognosis care
Authors: Louise Lemmens; Snjezana Kos; Cornelis Beijer; Jacoline W Brinkman; Frans A L van der Horst; Leonie van den Hoven; Dorit C Kieslinger; Netty J van Trooyen-van Vrouwerff; Albert Wolthuis; Jan C M Hendriks; Alex M M Wetzels Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Joel Ager; Hao Huang; Karl R Hansen; Valerie Baker; Rebecca Usadi; Aimee Seungdamrong; G Wright Bates; R Mitchell Rosen; Daniel Haisenleder; Stephen A Krawetz; Kurt Barnhart; J C Trussell; Dana Ohl; Yufeng Jin; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 91.245