Literature DB >> 35731321

Ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review of the literature.

Carleigh B Nesbit1,2, Misty Blanchette-Porter1,2, Navid Esfandiari3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this review is to define live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) for women ≥ 40 undergoing ovulation induction (OI)/intrauterine insemination (IUI).
METHODS: A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Google Scholar. The primary and secondary outcomes of interest were LBR and CPR, respectively.
RESULTS: There were 636 studies screened of which 42 were included. In 8 studies which provided LBR for partner sperm, LBR/cycle ranged from 0 to 8.5% with majority being ≤ 4%. Cumulative LBR was 3.6 to 7.1% over 6 cycles with the majority of pregnancies in the first 4. In the four studies providing LBR for donor sperm cycles, LBR/cycle ranged from 3 to 7% with cumulative LBR of 12 to 24% over 6 cycles. The majority of pregnancies occurred in the first 6 cycles. There were three studies with LBR or CPR/cycle ≥ 1% for women ≥ 43. No studies provided data above this range for women ≥ 45. In 4 studies which compared OI/IUI and IVF, the LBR from IVF was 9.2 to 22% per cycle. In 7 studies which compared outcomes by stimulation protocol, no significant differences were seen.
CONCLUSION: For women ≥ 40 using homologous sperm, the highest probability of live birth is via IVF. However, if IVF is not an option, OI/IUI may be considered for up to 4 cycles in those using partner sperm or 6 cycles with donor sperm. For women > 45, OI/IUI is likely futile but a limited trial may be considered for psychological benefit while encouraging consideration of donor oocyte IVF or adoption. Use of gonadotropins does not appear to be more effective than oral agents in this age group.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced maternal age; Advanced reproductive age; In vitro fertilization; Intrauterine insemination; Ovulation induction

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35731321      PMCID: PMC9365895          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02551-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  66 in total

1.  Female and male partner age and menotrophin requirements influence pregnancy rates with human menopausal gonadotrophin therapy in combination with intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  P R Brzechffa; R P Buyalos
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Effect of maternal and paternal age on pregnancy and miscarriage rates after intrauterine insemination.

Authors:  Stéphanie Belloc; Paul Cohen-Bacrie; Moncef Benkhalifa; Martine Cohen-Bacrie; Jacques De Mouzon; André Hazout; Yves Ménézo
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Intrauterine Insemination: Fundamentals Revisited.

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-10-25

4.  Determinants of the outcome of intrauterine insemination: analysis of outcomes of 9963 consecutive cycles.

Authors:  B A Stone; J M Vargyas; G E Ringler; A L Stein; R P Marrs
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Patient selection for assisted reproductive technology treatments.

Authors:  L P Cheung
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.227

Review 6.  The process of decision making in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Annika K Ludwig; Klaus Diedrich; Michael Ludwig
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.303

Review 7.  Predictive factors for pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI): an analysis of 1038 cycles and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Philippe Merviel; Marie Hélène Heraud; Nadège Grenier; Emmanuelle Lourdel; Pierre Sanguinet; Henri Copin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  In Vitro Fertilization Versus Mild Stimulation Intrauterine Insemination in Women Aged 40 and Older.

Authors:  Laurice Bou Nemer; Vanessa N Weitzman; Kristopher L Arheart; Marcelo J Barrionuevo; Daniel R Christie; Youssef Mouhayar; David I Hoffman; Wayne S Maxson; Steven J Ory
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 3.060

9.  Homologous intrauterine insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles.

Authors:  M R Khalil; P E Rasmussen; K Erb; S B Laursen; S Rex; L G Westergaard
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Pregnancy predictors after intrauterine insemination: analysis of 3012 cycles in 1201 couples.

Authors:  Macizo Soria; Gálvez Pradillo; Jorquera García; Peinado Ramón; Alvarez Castillo; Canteras Jordana; Parrilla Paricio
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2012-07
View more
  1 in total

1.  Developing machine learning-based models to predict intrauterine insemination (IUI) success by address modeling challenges in imbalanced data and providing modification solutions for them.

Authors:  Sajad Khodabandelu; Zahra Basirat; Sara Khaleghi; Soraya Khafri; Hussain Montazery Kordy; Masoumeh Golsorkhtabaramiri
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.298

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.