BACKGROUND:Cognitive declineafter cardiac surgery occurs frequently and persists in a significant proportion of patients. Preclinical studies and human trials suggest that intravenous lidocaine may confer protection in the setting of neurologic injury. It was hypothesized that lidocaine administration would reduce cognitive declineafter cardiac surgery compared to placebo. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 478 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled into this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Subjects were randomized to lidocaine 1 mg/kg bolus after the induction of anesthesia followed by a continuous infusion (48 μg · kg · min for the first hour, 24 μg · kg · min for the second hour, and 10 μg · kg · min for the next 46 h) or saline with identical volume and rate changes to preserve blinding. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 1 yr postoperatively using a standard neurocognitive test battery. The primary outcome was change in cognitive function between baseline and 6 weeks postoperatively, adjusting for age, years of education, baseline cognition, race, and procedure type. RESULTS: Among the 420 allocated subjects who returned for 6-week follow-up (lidocaine: N = 211; placebo: N = 209), there was no difference in the continuous cognitive score change (adjusted mean difference [95% CI], 0.02 (-0.05, 0.08); P = 0.626). Cognitive deficit (greater than 1 SD decline in at least one cognitive domain) at 6 weeks occurred in 41% (87 of 211) in the lidocaine group versus 40% (83 of 209) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 0.94 [0.63, 1.41]; P = 0.766). There were no differences in any quality of life outcomes between treatment groups. At the 1-yr follow-up, there continued to be no difference in cognitive score change, cognitive deficit, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS:Intravenous lidocaine administered during and after cardiac surgery did not reduce postoperative cognitive decline at 6 weeks.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Cognitive decline after cardiac surgery occurs frequently and persists in a significant proportion of patients. Preclinical studies and human trials suggest that intravenous lidocaine may confer protection in the setting of neurologic injury. It was hypothesized that lidocaine administration would reduce cognitive decline after cardiac surgery compared to placebo. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 478 patients undergoing cardiac surgery were enrolled into this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Subjects were randomized to lidocaine 1 mg/kg bolus after the induction of anesthesia followed by a continuous infusion (48 μg · kg · min for the first hour, 24 μg · kg · min for the second hour, and 10 μg · kg · min for the next 46 h) or saline with identical volume and rate changes to preserve blinding. Cognitive function was assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 1 yr postoperatively using a standard neurocognitive test battery. The primary outcome was change in cognitive function between baseline and 6 weeks postoperatively, adjusting for age, years of education, baseline cognition, race, and procedure type. RESULTS: Among the 420 allocated subjects who returned for 6-week follow-up (lidocaine: N = 211; placebo: N = 209), there was no difference in the continuous cognitive score change (adjusted mean difference [95% CI], 0.02 (-0.05, 0.08); P = 0.626). Cognitive deficit (greater than 1 SD decline in at least one cognitive domain) at 6 weeks occurred in 41% (87 of 211) in the lidocaine group versus 40% (83 of 209) in the placebo group (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI], 0.94 [0.63, 1.41]; P = 0.766). There were no differences in any quality of life outcomes between treatment groups. At the 1-yr follow-up, there continued to be no difference in cognitive score change, cognitive deficit, or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine administered during and after cardiac surgery did not reduce postoperative cognitive decline at 6 weeks.
Authors: Susanne Picardi; Sibylle Cartellieri; Danja Groves; Klaus Hahnenkamp; Klaus Hahnenekamp; Peter Gerner; Marcel E Durieux; Markus F Stevens; Philipp Lirk; Markus W Hollmann Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2013 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Jeffrey N Browndyke; Mary C Wright; Rosa Yang; Ayesha Syed; John Park; Ashley Hall; Katherine Martucci; Michael J Devinney; Leslie Shaw; Teresa Waligorska; Eugene W Moretti; Heather E Whitson; Harvey J Cohen; Joseph P Mathew; Miles Berger Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2021-09-14 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Deborah M Oyeyemi; Mary Cooter; Stacey Chung; Heather E Whitson; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Michael J Devinney; Patrick J Smith; Grant E Garrigues; Eugene Moretti; Judd W Moul; Harvey Jay Cohen; Joseph P Mathew; Miles Berger Journal: J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 2.680
Authors: Miles Berger; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Mary Cooter Wright; Chloe Nobuhara; Melody Reese; Leah Acker; W Michael Bullock; Brian J Colin; Michael J Devinney; Eugene W Moretti; Judd W Moul; Brian Ohlendorf; Daniel T Laskowitz; Teresa Waligorska; Leslie M Shaw; Heather E Whitson; Harvey J Cohen; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.430