BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely known for inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels underlying their antiarrhythmic and antinociceptive effects. However, LAs have significant immunomodulatory properties and were shown to affect human neutrophil functions independent of sodium-channel blockade. Previous studies suggest a highly selective interaction between LAs and the α-subunit of G protein-coupled receptors of the Gq/G11 family as underlying mechanism. Providing a detailed structure function analysis, this study aimed to determine the active parts within the LA molecule responsible for the effects on human neutrophil priming. METHODS: Human neutrophils were incubated with structurally different LAs for 60 minutes, followed by priming and activation using either platelet-activating factor or lysophosphatidic acid and N-formyl-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine. Superoxide anion generation was determined, using the cytochrome c reduction assay. RESULTS: Differences in priming inhibition of human neutrophils between LAs were smaller than expected, although significant. Ester-linked LAs blocked priming responses more effectively than did amide LAs. Furthermore, the inhibitory potency of LAs on priming decreased with an increase of their respective octanol-buffer coefficient, and inhibition did not correlate with sodium-channel-blocking potency. Charge was not crucially required for priming inhibition, yet it played a role in effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetics significantly attenuated Gαq-protein-mediated neutrophil priming. The most potent inhibition was achieved by ester compounds, inversely correlated with their octanol-buffer coefficient, and enhanced by permanent charges within the LA molecule. No correlation to their potency of blocking sodium channels was found.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely known for inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels underlying their antiarrhythmic and antinociceptive effects. However, LAs have significant immunomodulatory properties and were shown to affect human neutrophil functions independent of sodium-channel blockade. Previous studies suggest a highly selective interaction between LAs and the α-subunit of G protein-coupled receptors of the Gq/G11 family as underlying mechanism. Providing a detailed structure function analysis, this study aimed to determine the active parts within the LA molecule responsible for the effects on human neutrophil priming. METHODS:Human neutrophils were incubated with structurally different LAs for 60 minutes, followed by priming and activation using either platelet-activating factor or lysophosphatidic acid and N-formyl-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine. Superoxide anion generation was determined, using the cytochrome c reduction assay. RESULTS: Differences in priming inhibition of human neutrophils between LAs were smaller than expected, although significant. Ester-linked LAs blocked priming responses more effectively than did amide LAs. Furthermore, the inhibitory potency of LAs on priming decreased with an increase of their respective octanol-buffer coefficient, and inhibition did not correlate with sodium-channel-blocking potency. Charge was not crucially required for priming inhibition, yet it played a role in effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetics significantly attenuated Gαq-protein-mediated neutrophil priming. The most potent inhibition was achieved by ester compounds, inversely correlated with their octanol-buffer coefficient, and enhanced by permanent charges within the LA molecule. No correlation to their potency of blocking sodium channels was found.
Authors: Rebecca Y Klinger; Mary Cooter; Miles Berger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Thomas L Ortel; Ian J Welsby; Jerrold H Levy; Henry M Rinder; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 5.063
Authors: Rebecca Y Klinger; Mary Cooter; Tiffany Bisanar; Niccolò Terrando; Miles Berger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Stefan Weinschenk; Caroline Mergenthaler; Christina Armstrong; Richard Göllner; Markus W Hollmann; Thomas Strowitzki Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Christian P Both; Jörg Thomas; Philipp K Bühler; Achim Schmitz; Markus Weiss; Tobias Piegeler Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 2.217
Authors: Hyeon-Joong Kim; Sun-Hye Choi; Na-Eun Lee; Hee-Jung Cho; Hyewhon Rhim; Hyoung-Chun Kim; Sung-Hee Hwang; Seung-Yeol Nah Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 3.390