Literature DB >> 23222364

Local anesthetic-induced inhibition of human neutrophil priming: the influence of structure, lipophilicity, and charge.

Susanne Picardi1, Sibylle Cartellieri, Danja Groves, Klaus Hahnenkamp, Klaus Hahnenekamp, Peter Gerner, Marcel E Durieux, Markus F Stevens, Philipp Lirk, Markus W Hollmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Local anesthetics (LAs) are widely known for inhibition of voltage-gated sodium channels underlying their antiarrhythmic and antinociceptive effects. However, LAs have significant immunomodulatory properties and were shown to affect human neutrophil functions independent of sodium-channel blockade. Previous studies suggest a highly selective interaction between LAs and the α-subunit of G protein-coupled receptors of the Gq/G11 family as underlying mechanism. Providing a detailed structure function analysis, this study aimed to determine the active parts within the LA molecule responsible for the effects on human neutrophil priming.
METHODS: Human neutrophils were incubated with structurally different LAs for 60 minutes, followed by priming and activation using either platelet-activating factor or lysophosphatidic acid and N-formyl-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine. Superoxide anion generation was determined, using the cytochrome c reduction assay.
RESULTS: Differences in priming inhibition of human neutrophils between LAs were smaller than expected, although significant. Ester-linked LAs blocked priming responses more effectively than did amide LAs. Furthermore, the inhibitory potency of LAs on priming decreased with an increase of their respective octanol-buffer coefficient, and inhibition did not correlate with sodium-channel-blocking potency. Charge was not crucially required for priming inhibition, yet it played a role in effect size.
CONCLUSIONS: Local anesthetics significantly attenuated Gαq-protein-mediated neutrophil priming. The most potent inhibition was achieved by ester compounds, inversely correlated with their octanol-buffer coefficient, and enhanced by permanent charges within the LA molecule. No correlation to their potency of blocking sodium channels was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23222364     DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31827a3cbe

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Systemic effects of amide-linked local anesthetics : Old drugs, new magic bullets?]

Authors:  T Piegeler; R Werdehausen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Effect of intravenous lidocaine on the transcerebral inflammatory response during cardiac surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Y Klinger; Mary Cooter; Miles Berger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Thomas L Ortel; Ian J Welsby; Jerrold H Levy; Henry M Rinder; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Intravenous Lidocaine Does Not Improve Neurologic Outcomes after Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Y Klinger; Mary Cooter; Tiffany Bisanar; Niccolò Terrando; Miles Berger; Mihai V Podgoreanu; Mark Stafford-Smith; Mark F Newman; Joseph P Mathew
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  What's new in critical illness and injury science? State of the art in management of ARDS.

Authors:  Stanislaw P Stawicki; Mamta Swaroop; Sagar C Galwankar; Thomas J Papadimos
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014-04

Review 5.  Perioperative regional anaesthesia and postoperative longer-term outcomes.

Authors:  Jan Jakobsson; Mark Z Johnson
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-10-11

Review 6.  The Amide Local Anesthetic Lidocaine in Cancer Surgery-Potential Antimetastatic Effects and Preservation of Immune Cell Function? A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Thiên-Nga Chamaraux-Tran; Tobias Piegeler
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-12-20

7.  Local Anesthetics, Procaine, Lidocaine, and Mepivacaine Show Vasodilatation but No Type 1 Allergy: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study.

Authors:  Stefan Weinschenk; Caroline Mergenthaler; Christina Armstrong; Richard Göllner; Markus W Hollmann; Thomas Strowitzki
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Factors associated with intravenous lidocaine in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy - a retrospective, single-centre experience.

Authors:  Christian P Both; Jörg Thomas; Philipp K Bühler; Achim Schmitz; Markus Weiss; Tobias Piegeler
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Effects of Gintonin-Enriched Fraction on Methylmercury-Induced Neurotoxicity and Organ Methylmercury Elimination.

Authors:  Hyeon-Joong Kim; Sun-Hye Choi; Na-Eun Lee; Hee-Jung Cho; Hyewhon Rhim; Hyoung-Chun Kim; Sung-Hee Hwang; Seung-Yeol Nah
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Lidocaine mediates the progression of cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats via inhibiting the activation of NF-κB p65 and p38 MAPK.

Authors:  Rong Jiang; Juan Liao; Meng-Chang Yang; Jia Deng; Yun-Xia Hu; Peng Li; Mei-Ting Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.