Literature DB >> 30869985

Who shines most among the brightest?: A 25-year longitudinal study of elite STEM graduate students.

Kira O McCabe1, David Lubinski1, Camilla P Benbow1.   

Abstract

In 1992, the Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY) surveyed 714 first- and second-year graduate students (48.5% female) attending U.S. universities ranked in the top-15 by science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) field. This study investigated whether individual differences assessed early in their graduate school career were associated with becoming a STEM leader 25 years later (e.g., STEM full professors at research-intensive universities, STEM CEOs, and STEM leaders in government) versus not becoming a STEM leader. We also studied whether there were any important gender differences in relation to STEM leadership. For both men and women, small to medium effect size differences in interests, values, and personality distinguished STEM leaders from nonleaders. Lifestyle and work preferences also distinguished STEM leaders who were more exclusively career-focused and preferred to work-and did work-more hours than nonleaders. Also, there were small to large gender differences in abilities, interests, and lifestyle preferences. Men had more intense interests in STEM and were more career-focused. Women had more diverse educational and occupational interests, and they were more interested in activities outside of work. Early in graduate school, therefore, there are signs that predict who will become a STEM leader-even among elite STEM graduate students. Given the many ways in which STEM leadership can be achieved, the gender differences uncovered within this high-potential sample suggest that men and women are likely to assign different priorities to these opportunities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30869985      PMCID: PMC6745019          DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  44 in total

1.  PERSONALITY AND THE REALIZATION OF CREATIVE POTENTIAL.

Authors:  D W MACKINNON
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1965-04

2.  Creativity and technical innovation: spatial ability's unique role.

Authors:  Harrison J Kell; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow; James H Steiger
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-07-11

3.  Occupational attainment as a function of abilities and interests: a longitudinal analysis using project TALENT data.

Authors:  J T Austin; K A Hanisch
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  1990-02

4.  Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.

Authors:  Stephen J Ceci; Donna K Ginther; Shulamit Kahn; Wendy M Williams
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  Intelligence, personality, and interests: evidence for overlapping traits.

Authors:  P L Ackerman; E D Heggestad
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Authors:  David C Geary
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2011-09-26

7.  Vocational interests assessed at the end of high school predict life outcomes assessed 10 years later over and above IQ and Big Five personality traits.

Authors:  Gundula Stoll; Sven Rieger; Oliver Lüdtke; Benjamin Nagengast; Ulrich Trautwein; Brent W Roberts
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2016-08-25

8.  Changes in scientific activities with age.

Authors:  A Roe
Journal:  Science       Date:  1965-10-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education.

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; David C Geary
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14

10.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica L Degol
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-01-13
View more
  7 in total

1.  Psychological Constellations Assessed at Age 13 Predict Distinct Forms of Eminence 35 Years Later.

Authors:  Brian O Bernstein; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

2.  Academic Acceleration in Gifted Youth and Fruitless Concerns Regarding Psychological Well-Being: A 35-Year Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Brian O Bernstein; David Lubinski; Camilla P Benbow
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  2020-07-02

3.  Evidence and Implications from a Natural Experiment of Prenatal Androgen Effects on Gendered Behavior.

Authors:  Sheri A Berenbaum; Adriene M Beltz
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-06-18

4.  Effects of Culture on the Balance Between Mathematics Achievement and Subjective Wellbeing.

Authors:  Jingyi Meng; Simiao Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  Understanding educational, occupational, and creative outcomes requires assessing intraindividual differences in abilities and interests.

Authors:  David Lubinski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Critical Thinking: A Model of Intelligence for Solving Real-World Problems.

Authors:  Diane F Halpern; Dana S Dunn
Journal:  J Intell       Date:  2021-04-07

7.  Gender differences in the pathways to higher education.

Authors:  Gijsbert Stoet; David C Geary
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.205

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.