| Literature DB >> 30866516 |
Edoardo Staderini1, Romeo Patini2, Andrea Camodeca3, Federica Guglielmi4, Patrizia Gallenzi5.
Abstract
The applications of computer-guided technologies for three-dimensional image analysis provide a unique opportunity to quantify the morphological dimensional changes of the face in a practical and convenient way. Symmetry of the nasolabial area is one of the main factors of facial attractiveness as well as being the main objective of the treatment of cleft lip and palate (CLP). Technological advances in computer-guided visualization modes and their applications to three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry provide more practical opportunities and alternatives for facial analysis. Each study, however, uses different protocols for the acquisition and analysis of three-dimensional images. In addition, each study identifies different anthropometric points and calculates linear and angular measurements with overlapping protocols. Therefore, it is appropriate to define a standardization of the three-dimensional analysis of CLP patients to compare the studies of different research centers. The aim of this report is to propose a protocol to standardize the acquisition and analysis of three-dimensional images to evaluate the three-dimensional changes in the nasolabial area in cleft lip and palate patients undergoing pre-surgical nasoalveolar molding (PNAM).Entities:
Keywords: case report; cleft lip and palate; stereophotogrammetry
Year: 2019 PMID: 30866516 PMCID: PMC6473357 DOI: 10.3390/dj7010027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dent J (Basel) ISSN: 2304-6767
Figure 1Three-dimensional acquisition of the face with anthropometric points.
Figure 2The digital workflow in a sequence shows: a selection of the symmetry areas; creation of the symmetry plan; delimitation of the area to be analyzed; and the overlap of a mirrored hemiface.
Two-dimensional face measures and asymmetry index.
| Distances | Linear Measurements (mm) | Angles | Angular Measurements (Degrees) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | Before NAM therapy | After NAM therapy | Values | Before NAM therapy | After NAM therapy | ||
| Stn-Sn | 24.73 | > | 24.47 | Acr-Sn-Prn | 131.7 | < | 152.49 |
| Stn-Prn | 20.49 | < | 21.45 | Acl-Sn-Prn | 54.67 | < | 62.69 |
| Sn-Prn | 6.2 | < | 6.95 | Sn-Prn-Acl | 110.45 | > | 97.03 |
| Sbalr-Sn’r | 4.56 | > | 4.24 | Sn-Prn-Acr | 29.9 | > | 16.59 |
| Sball-Sn’l | 18.41 | > | 15.68 | Sn-Prn-Alr | 45.92 | > | 34.31 |
| Alr-All | 25.61 | < | 28.77 | Sn-Prn-All | 114.19 | > | 104.89 |
| Acr-Acl | 29.85 | > | 27.91 | Sn-Prn-Adr | 57.49 | > | 50.44 |
| Sbalr-Sball | 24.38 | > | 22.63 | Sn-Prn-Adl | 109.9 | > | 108.14 |
| Sn-C’r | 5.53 | < | 5.86 | Sn-Prn-Sbalr | 33.23 | > | 21.1 |
| Sn-C’l | 9.19 | < | 10.67 | Sn-Prn-Sball | 104.08 | > | 96.8 |
| Acr-Prn | 14.66 | < | 16.95 | Prn-Stn-Sn | 11.52 | < | 15.7 |
| Acl-Prn | 19.7 | > | 17.81 | Sn-Prn-Stn | 127.18 | > | 107.64 |
| Asymmetry index | Mean | Standard deviation | |||||
| Before NAM therapy | −3.167 mm | 2.28 mm | <0.05 * | ||||
| After NAM therapy | 1.57 mm | 2.189 mm | <0.05 * | ||||
NAM = nasoalveolar molding; Sn = subnasal point; Sn’l = intersection of the left side of the columella with the labial filter; Sn’r = intersection of the right side of the columella with the labial filter; Sbalr = intersection of the right side of the columella with the labial filter; Sball = left subarray point; Alr = right wing point; All = left wing point; Acr = point of the right wing bending; C’r = point of the right columella; C’l = point of the left columella; Acl = point of the left wing bending; Adr = right wing point; Adl = left wing point; Stn = soft tissue nasion; Prn = prostasal point. > changes related to an improvement of symmetry. < changes related to a worsening of symmetry. * = Statistically significant values.
Figure 3Overlap 3D of the pre- and post-treatment faces.