Literature DB >> 8638559

Effects of reverse headgear treatment on sagittal correction in girls born with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate--skeletal and dental changes.

L L So1.   

Abstract

Patients with cleft lip and cleft palate often develop maxillary retrognathism. This is due to the combined effects of the congenital deformity and surgical repairs. Early protraction of the maxilla with extraoral forces helps to achieve more balanced skeletal harmony and favorable occlusion for future growth to occur. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the proportion of the skeletal and dental changes contributing to the improvement in a group of Southern Chinese girls born with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate treated by the reverse headgear. This study only focused on treating a homogenous sample group, i.e., only girls with unilateral complete cleft lip and cleft palate. This design was deliberate so as to avoid having boys and girls with various types of cleft all pooled together for analyses as seen in most of the previous reports. In addition, comparison was made with girls matched in having a similar deformity, presenting a similar skeletal structure and maturity status to reveal the genuine treatment effect. The 9.7 months of reverse headgear treatment improved the sagittal jaw relationship (p < 0.01) and overjet (p < 0.01), which was effected by about two-thirds skeletal and one-third dental changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8638559     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(96)70174-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction long-term outcomes in UCLP.

Authors:  Daniela Garib; Fernando Pugliese; Renata Mayumi Kato; Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Protocols for Late Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles.

Authors:  Stephen L-K Yen
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 0.970

3.  Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a cephalometric appraisal.

Authors:  Renato Faco; Marilia Yatabe; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Hilde Timmerman; Hugo J De Clerck; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Comparison of the effects of maxillary protraction using facemask and miniplate anchorage between unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Won Ahn; Keun-Woo Kim; Il-Hyung Yang; Jin-Young Choi; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  New treatment modality for maxillary hypoplasia in cleft patients. Protraction facemask with miniplate anchorage.

Authors:  Seung-Hak Baek; Keun-Woo Kim; Jin-Young Choi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  The effects of face mask therapy in cleft lip and palate patients.

Authors:  Servet Dogan
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-07

7.  Displacements prediction from 3D finite element model of maxillary protraction with and without rapid maxillary expansion in a patient with unilateral cleft palate and alveolus.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Li Zheng; Qiang Wang; Li Lu; Jia Ma
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.819

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.