| Literature DB >> 30863219 |
J L Goggi1,2, A Haslop1, R Boominathan1, K Chan1, V Soh1, P Cheng1, E G Robins1,3, K K Bhakoo1.
Abstract
Purpose: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) causes narrowing of arteries in the limbs, leading to tissue ischemia, gangrene, and eventually limb amputation. The presence of diabetes greatly exacerbates the course of PAD, accounting for the majority of lower limb amputations. Therapeutic strategies focussing on macrovascular repair are less effective in diabetic patients where smaller vessels are affected, and proangiogenic therapies offer a viable adjunct to improve vascularisation in these at risk individuals. The purpose of the current study was to assess the proangiogenic effects of drugs routinely used to treat cardiovascular disease in a diabetic murine model of hind limb ischemia longitudinally using multimodal imaging. Procedures: Diabetic mice underwent surgical intervention to induce hind limb ischemia and were treated with simvastatin, metformin, or a combination orally for 28 days and compared to diabetic and nondiabetic mice. Neovascularisation was assessed using [18F]FtRGD PET imaging, and macrovascular volume was assessed by quantitative time of flight MRI. At each imaging time point, VEGF expression and capillary vessel density were quantified using immunohistochemical analysis, and functional recovery and disease progression were assessed.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30863219 PMCID: PMC6378011 DOI: 10.1155/2019/2538909
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
Figure 1Representative images displaying (a) laser Doppler perfusion imaging assessment of tissue perfusion before (upper panel) and after femoral artery ligation (lower panel). The region of interest placement is indicated in white. (b) Representative images showing uptake of [18F]FtRGD in the ischemic leg at day 8 in each of the diabetic treatment groups (representative nondiabetic image not shown). The region of interest placement for the ischemic leg is indicated in yellow, and region of interest placement for the contralateral intact leg is shown in green.
Table of assessment criteria for limb damage and limb function after induction of hind limb ischemia.
| Score | Limb damage | Functional use |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | No necrosis | Normal foot use for climbing and walking |
| 2 | Necrosis affecting one toenail | Reduced ability to grip when climbing/normal use when walking |
| 3 | Necrosis affecting two toenails or more | Foot not used for support when climbing/reduced use when walking |
| 4 | Necrosis affecting one toe | Foot not used for support when walking |
| 5 | Necrosis affecting two toes or more | Dragging limb |
Impairment score was determined by multiplying the limb damage score by the functional use score (impairment score = limb damage score × functional use score).
Figure 2(a) Retention of [18F]FtRGD measured by longitudinal PET imaging (∼10 MBq, acquired from 70–90 min postinjection under isoflurane anaesthesia). Closed circles represent data from the ischemic leg and open circles represent data from the contralateral intact leg. Retention was significantly higher in the combination-treated ischemic limb from day 8 to day 28 postligation (whereas the nondiabetic ischemic limb and simvastatin-treated ischemic limb were only significantly higher on days 8 and 14 and metformin on day 8 only) compared to the vehicle-treated ischemic limb (n=6, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, data shown as %ID/g ± SD). (b) Hind limb vascular volume measured by TOF MRI. Vascular volume was significantly higher in the nondiabetic ischemic limb, combined treatment ischemic limb, simvastatin-treated ischemic limb, and metformin-treated ischemic limb from day 21 to 28 postligation compared to the vehicle-treated ischemic limb (n=6, p < 0.05, 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, mean volume in mm3 ± SD). (c) Blood glucose concentration measured by venous blood sampling. Both metformin and combined treatment decreased the blood glucose levels from day 2 (n=6, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, mean % area stained ± SD). (d) Observational measures of disease progression and functional limb use. Functional foot use was severely impaired in all animals early in the study with gradual improvement observed in the treated and nondiabetic groups in comparison to the vehicle-treated diabetic group. Development of progressive necrosis was observed in the vehicle-treated group; a slower progression was observed in the simvastatin-treated group, metformin-treated group, and nondiabetic group, whereas no necrosis was observed in the combined treatment group (n=6, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, mean impairment score ± SD).
Figure 3(a) Graph showing the number of CD31 positive vessels in the diabetic ischemic hind limb only measured by immunohistochemical assessment of anti-CD31 antibody staining. The number of CD31 positive capillaries was significantly higher in the combined treatment ischemic limb, simvastatin-treated ischemic limb, and metformin-treated ischemic limb from day 8 to day 28 postligation compared to the vehicle-treated ischemic limb (n=4, p < 0.05, p < 0.01 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, mean number of capillaries ± SD). (b) Representative muscle sections taken at day 8 displaying staining for CD31 in the diabetic vehicle-treated ischemic muscle, metformin-treated ischemic muscle, simvastatin-treated ischemic muscle, and combination-treated (D) ischemic muscle (representative nondiabetic image not shown). (c) Graph showing the percentage area of VEGF intense positive staining in diabetic hind limb muscle measured by immunohistochemical assessment of anti-VEGF antibody staining. VEGF staining was significantly higher in the combination-treated ischemic limb from day 8 to day 28 postligation (whereas simvastatin was only significantly higher on days 8 and 14 and metformin on day 8 only) compared to the vehicle-treated ischemic limb (n=4, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, 1-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey's test, mean % area stained ± SD). (d) Representative muscle sections taken at day 8 displaying staining for VEGF in the diabetic vehicle-treated ischemic muscle, metformin-treated ischemic muscle, simvastatin-treated ischemic muscle, and combination-treated ischemic muscle (representative nondiabetic image not shown).