| Literature DB >> 31866798 |
S V Hartimath1, R Boominathan1, V Soh1, P Cheng1, X Deng1, Y C Chong1, F F Yong1, P W Tan1, W Han1, E G Robins1,2, J L Goggi1.
Abstract
Purpose: Liver fibrosis is the hallmark of chronic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and is characterised by the excessive deposition of extracellular matrix proteins. Early detection and accurate staging of liver fibrosis is critically important for patient management. One of the earliest pathological markers in NASH is the activation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) which may be exploited as a marker of fibrogenesis. Activated HSCs secreting factors such as integrin α v β 3 propagate fibrosis. The purpose of the current study was to assess the utility of the integrin α v β 3 imaging agent [18F]FtRGD for the early detection of fibrosis in a diet-induced model of NASH longitudinally using PET imaging. Procedures: Mice were fed with either standard chow diet (SD), high-fat diet (HFD), or a choline-deficient, L-amino acid-defined high-fat fibrogenic diet (CDAHFD) to mimic the clinical pathology of liver disease and followed longitudinally for 10 weeks to assess the development of liver fibrosis using [18F]FtRGD positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Standard blood biochemistry, histological measures, and qPCR were used to quantify integrin α v β 3, smooth muscle actin, and collagen types 1 and 6 to assess the extent of NASH pathology and accurately stage liver fibrosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31866798 PMCID: PMC6914933 DOI: 10.1155/2019/6298128
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging ISSN: 1555-4309 Impact factor: 3.161
The physiological measures of liver disease in mice fed with CDAHDF (n = 5) compared with HFD-fed mice (n = 5). All data are presented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance is shown as p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001.
| Days | Liver weight (g) | Triglycerides (mg/g) | Hydroxyproline ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDAHFD | HFD | CDAHFD | HFD | CDAHFD | HFD | |
| 21 | 1.5 ± 0.05 | 1.15 ± 0.02 | 43.86 ± 2.17 | 47.34 ± 2.17 | 4.29 ± 0.17 | 4.71 ± 0.47 |
| 28 | 1.69 ± 0.02 | 1.27 ± 0.05 | 49.46 ± 2.39 | 45.94 ± 1.82 | 4.95 ± 0.54 | 4.58 ± 0.39 |
| 35 | 1.85 ± 0.17 | 1.30 ± 0.05 | 56.83 ± 1.50 | 42.87 ± 3.67 | 5.68 ± 0.14 | 4.25 ± 0.62 |
| 42 | 2.00 ± 0.11 | 1.40 ± 0.06 | 59.67 ± 1.52 | 41.53 ± 2.50 | 5.96 ± 0.16 | 4.15 ± 0.42 |
| 56 | 2.20 ± 0.06 | 1.46 ± 0.08 | 61.47 ± 1.18 | 40.03 ± 1.50 | 6.17 ± 0.12 | 4.04 ± 0.24 |
| 70 | 2.23 ± 0.18 | 1.51 ± 0.10 | 63.34 ± 2.67 | 37.16 ± 0.88 | 6.35 ± 0.26 | 3.53 ± 0.13 |
Figure 1Hepatic histopathology of mice fed with CDAHFD or HFD from day 21 until day 70: (a) H&E staining and (b) Picro Sirius Red staining (PSR). All images represented at 200x.
Liver uptake of [18F]FtRGD in mice fed with CDAHDF, HFD, and standard diet-fed mice (n = 5 per group). All data are presented as mean ± SD, and statistical significance is shown as p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001.
| Days | Standard diet | High fat diet | CDAHFD |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | 0.52 ± 0.13 | 0.50 ± 0.19 | 0.64 ± 0.11 |
| 28 | 0.54 ± 0.16 | 0.62 ± 0.18 | 0.72 ± 0.19 |
| 35 | 0.46 ± 0.11$ | 0.56 ± 0.13 | 0.70 ± 0.10 |
| 42 | 0.57 ± 0.09$ | 0.60 ± 0.16 | 0.74 ± 0.11 |
| 49 | 0.47 ± 0.11$$ | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.84 ± 0.11 |
| 56 | 0.53 ± 0.09$$ | 0.52 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.10 |
| 63 | 0.48 ± 0.14$$ | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 0.88 ± 0.13 |
| 72 | 0.57 ± 0.10$$ | 0.51 ± 0.09 | 0.96 ± 0.15 |
Figure 2Representative images of [18F]FtRGD uptake in CDAHFD, HFD, and standard diet-fed mouse livers over the time course studied; red arrows indicate gall bladder uptake and white arrows depict the liver.
Figure 3PET-derived [18F]FtRGD uptake in livers of CDAHFD, HFD, and standard diet-fed animals (n = 5). All animals were imaged 60 min after injection of [18F]FtRGD, and uptake was expressed as % change from day 21. Uptake of [18F]FtRGD in CDAHFD livers was significantly increased from day 49 (p < 0.01) compared with HFD-fed animals and from day 35 ($p < 0.05), when compared with mice fed with standard diet. Data are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 4Representative photomicrographs showing α-SMA immunohistochemistry in liver tissue of CDAHFD- or HFD-fed mice. Upper panels show data from CDAHFD animals, and lower panels show data from HFD animals; black arrows represent areas of α-SMA staining.
Figure 5Relative mRNA expression of genes associated with fibrosis in CDAHFD- and HFD-fed mice. (a) Collagen 1a1, (b) collagen 6a1, and (c) integrin αVβ3 were increased in CDAHFD-fed liver compared with HFD-fed mice from day 21. Data are expressed as fold difference, mean ± SD (p < 0.001, ns: no significant). (d) Correlation between hepatic uptake of [18F]FtRGD and mRNA expression of integrin αVβ3 (Pearson's correlation: r = 0.9272, p=0.0078).