| Literature DB >> 30862935 |
Maryse Fournier1,2, Eric Bonneil3, Carole Garofalo1, Guy Grimard4, Caroline Laverdière1,4, Maja Krajinovic1,4, Simon Drouin1, Daniel Sinnett1,4, Valérie Marcil1,2, Emile Levy5,6.
Abstract
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most frequent malignancy in children. With the use of more modern, efficient treatments, 5-year survival has reached more than 90% in this population. However, this achievement comes with many secondary and long-term effects since more than 65% of the survivors experience at least one severe complication, including the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases. The main objective of the present work was to characterize the composition of HDL particles isolated from pediatric ALL survivors. HDLs from 8 metabolically healthy ALL survivors, 8 metabolically unhealthy ALL survivors and 8 age- and gender-matched controls were analyzed. The HDL fraction from the survivors contained less cholesterol than the controls. In addition, proteomic analyses revealed an enrichment of pro-thrombotic (e.g., fibrinogen) and pro-inflammatory (e.g., amyloid A) proteins in the HDLs deriving from metabolically unhealthy survivors. These results indicate an alteration in the composition of lipid and protein content of HDL from childhood ALL survivors with metabolic disorders. Although more work is needed to validate the functionality of these HDLs, the data seem relevant for survivor health given the detection of potential biomarkers related to HDL metabolism and functionality in cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30862935 PMCID: PMC6414624 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-40906-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Anthropometric characteristics and treatment details of the participants.
| Controls | ALL Survivors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Healthy | Unhealthy | ||
| 8 (4) | 16 (8) | 8 (4) | 8 (4) | |
| 24.2 ± 2.0 | 24.3 ± 1.1 | 23.3 ± 1.6 | 25.4 ± 1.6 | |
| 23.5 ± 0.8 | 25.3 ± 1.6 | 22.3 ± 1.0 | 28.2 ± 2.7 | |
|
| ||||
| Men | 87.0 ± 2.8 | 86.4 ± 4.9 | 79.1 ± 7.4 | 93.8 ± 4.6 |
| Women | 80.6 ± 2.7 | 88.1 ± 7.7 | 78.6 ± 2.9 | 97.5 ± 14.5 |
| All | 83.8 ± 2.2 | 87.2 ± 4.4 | 78.8 ± 3.7 | 95.6 ± 7.1# |
| NA | 8.5 ± 1.3 | 10.9 ± 1.8 | 6.2 ± 1.7# | |
| NA | 13.6 ± 1.6 | 10.2 ± 1.1 | 17.1 ± 2.6 | |
|
| ||||
| Chemotherapy only | NA |
|
|
|
| Without cardioprotection | NA | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| With cardioprotection | NA | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Radiotherapy only | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chemotherapy + radiotherapy |
|
|
| |
| Without cardioprotection | 5 | 1 | 4 | |
| With cardioprotection | 7 | 5 | 2 | |
|
| ||||
| 0 | NA | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| 12 | NA | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| 18 | 6 | 2 | 4 | |
|
| ||||
| DFCI 1987-01 | NA | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DFCI 1991-01 | NA | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DFCI 1995-01 | NA | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| DFCI 2000-01 | NA | 5 | 4 | 1 |
| DFCI 2005-01 | NA | 3 | 2 | 1 |
|
| ||||
| Standard risk | NA | 12 | 7 | 5 |
| High risk | NA | 4 | 1 | 3 |
| NA | 11921 | 13573 | 10269 | |
|
| 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
Data on anthropometrics were collected on ALL survivors (n = 16) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 8). All survivors were stratified in 2 groups according to their metabolic status as described in Methods (n = 8/group).
NA, non-applicable.
Results are presented as Mean ± SEM. BMI: body mass index, DFCII: Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Gy: Gray; #p < 0.05 vs Healthy.
Metabolic characterization of the study participants.
| Controls | ALL Survivors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Healthy | Unhealthy | ||
|
| ||||
| Systolic | — | 124 ± 4 | 117 ± 4 | 130 ± 7 |
| Diastolic | — | 72 ± 3 | 66 ± 3 | 77 ± 5 |
| 5.1 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.1 | 4.8 ± 0.1 | 4.9 ± 0.2 | |
|
| ||||
| 30 min | — | 8.5 ± 0.4 | 8.1 ± 0.5 | 8.9 ± 0.6 |
| 60 min | — | 7.8 ± 0.6 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 9.2 ± 0.9# |
| 120 min | — | 5.9 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 6.4 ± 0.8 |
| 298 ± 49 | 685 ± 95* | 692 ± 172 | 678 ± 96 | |
| — | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 1.1 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.7# | |
|
| ||||
| 0 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Data on metabolic status were collected on ALL survivors (n = 16) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 8). ALL survivors were stratified in 2 groups according to their metabolic status as described in Methods (n = 8/group). Mets was defined per the NCEP ATP III (SOURCE), with the following cut-offs: (i) waist circumference >88 cm for women and >102 cm for men, (ii) HDL-C <1.29 mmol/L for women and <1.03 mmol/L for men, (iii) systolic blood pressure >130 or diastolic >85 mmHg, (iv) fasting blood glucose >6.1 mmol/L. Results are presented as Mean ± SEM. BP: blood pressure, CRP: C-reactive protein, FBG: fasting blood glucose, MDA: malondialdehyde, MetS: metabolic syndrome, OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test; *p < 0.05 vs Controls, #p < 0.05 vs Healthy.
Lipid profile and HDL composition of the study participants.
| Controls | ALL Survivors | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All | Healthy | Unhealthy | ||
| 0.90 ± 0.08 | 1.30 ± 0.36 | 0.79 ± 0.10 | 1.82 ± 0.69 | |
| 4.24 ± 0.15 | 4.46 ± 0.21 | 4.10 ± 0.22 | 4.82 ± 0.32 | |
| 2.27 ± 0.12 | 2.59 ± 0.16 | 2.22 ± 0.15 | 3.00 ± 0.20**## | |
|
| ||||
| Men | 1.41 ± 0.11 | 1.11 ± 0.09 | 1.29 ± 0.12 | 0.93 ± 0.03* |
| Women | 1.71 ± 0.08 | 1.42 ± 0.14 | 1.76 ± 0.11 | 1.07 ± 0.05**## |
| All | 1.56 ± 0.09 | 1.26 ± 0.09 | 1.53 ± 0.12 | 1.00 ± 0.04**### |
| 2.68 ± 0.15 | 3.20 ± 0.24 | 2.58 ± 0.14 | 3.82 ± 0.33*## | |
|
| 2.8 ± 0.2 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.4***### |
|
| ||||
| Triglycerides | 1.95 ± 0.29 | 2.55 ± 0.89 | 1.33 ± 0.23 | 3.76 ± 1.72 |
| Free Cholesterol | 3.93 ± 0.21 | 3.33 ± 0.12* | 3.62 ± 0.09 | 3.04 ± 0.17***## |
| Esterified Cholesterol | 19.66 ± 1.12 | 17.51 ± 0.56 | 18.74 ± 0.64 | 16.28 ± 0.70**# |
| Phospholipids | 29.83 ± 1.28 | 29.00 ± 0.96 | 29.12 ± 1.20 | 28.88 ± 1.59 |
| Proteins | 44.63 ± 1.55 | 47.62 ± 1.21 | 47.20 ± 1.40 | 48.05 ± 2.06 |
| Weight ratio | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.25 ± 0.01* | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 |
Lipid profile and HDL were obtained from ALL survivors (n = 16) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 8). ALL survivors were stratified in 2 groups according to their metabolic status as described in Methods (n = 8/group). Results are presented as Mean ± SEM. HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglycerides; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs Controls; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs Healthy.
Figure 1Roles of the different proteins found in the HDL. The HDL function enabled by the detected proteins were defined from the Gene Ontology terms from the UniProt Knowledgebase (n = 10 categories, n = 134 proteins). All the roles that applied for a single protein were considered. Results define the role and the number of proteins involved in this function.
Figure 2Venn diagram representing the proteins present in the 3 groups.
Figure 3Volcano plot representations of the proteins statistically differently expressed between 2 groups. (A) Controls vs Healthy, (B) Controls vs Unhealthy, (C) Healthy vs Unhealthy. X-axis represents the variation in expression [log2(fold change)], y-axis represents the statistical significance [−log(p-value)]. Proteins with coordinates (x, y) where x is <−1 or >1 and y is >1,3 are statistically reproducibly halved or doubled in a group of samples.
Figure 4Expression of specific HDL-associated proteins. Proteins from isolated HDL were loaded onto stain-free gel, which has a linear dynamic detection range and allows for protein detection on both gels and membranes along with the use of total protein measurement. Following gel electrophoresis with stain-free gels and in the presence of MW proteins (A), imaging using the Chemidoc MP System to check protein separation quality, the blot was incubated with primary antibodies against (B) SAA1, (C) fibrinogen, and (D) integrin β-3. Thereafter, the blot was incubated with the secondary antibody, followed by imaging and data analysis by Image Lab Software. Results are means ± SEM and originated from at least three subjects per group. Given the variability observed among individuals, the whole gels were shown according to the trend of the calculated average. **p < 0,01; ***p < 0,001.
Figure 5Effectiveness of HDL3 survivors in promoting cholesterol efflux. Differentiated Caco-2/15 cells were loaded with radiolabeled cholesterol by incubation for 24 h in 0.5 ml of supplemented RPMI with 5% v/v LPDS (lipoprotein-deficient serum) and 2.64 × 106 dpm/ml [14C]-cholesteryl oleate oxLDL (50 μg Apo B/ml). After a 16-hour equilibration period of time without radioactivity, cells were washed with PBS and incubated with HDL3 (25 μg/ml) for 24 h. The media were centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min to remove any suspended or dead cells and the cholesterol influx content was calculated by determining radioactivity in cell lysate. Values are means ± SEM for 5 separate survivors in each group (paired for age and sex). *p < 0,05