Literature DB >> 30859178

GREP: genome for REPositioning drugs.

Saori Sakaue1,2,3, Yukinori Okada1,2,4.   

Abstract

SUMMARY: Making use of accumulated genetic knowledge for clinical practice is our next goal in human genetics. Here we introduce GREP (Genome for REPositioning drugs), a standalone python software to quantify an enrichment of the user-defined set of genes in the target of clinical indication categories and to capture potentially repositionable drugs targeting the gene set. We show that genes identified by the large-scale genome-wide association studies were robustly enriched in the approved drugs to treat the trait of interest. This enrichment analysis was also highly applicable to other sets of biological genes such as those identified by gene expression studies and genes somatically mutated in cancers. This software should accelerate investigators to reposition drugs to other indications with the guidance of known genomics.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GREP is available at https://github.com/saorisakaue/GREP as a python source code. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30859178      PMCID: PMC6761931          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

After the fruitful decades of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) identifying thousands of loci robustly associated with human complex traits (Welter ), we are now heading to the next step to apply in silico genetic knowledge for clinical practice. Given the fact that more than half of clinical trials fail because of lack of efficacy or adverse events (Nelson ), the method to discover new therapeutics with the guidance of genomics should be warranted (Malik ; Okada ). Repositioning known drugs to another indication is an effective way to bring them to bedside, because their efficacy and potential adverse effects have already been investigated for the current indication. Here we introduce a software GREP (enome for ositioning drugs), which (i) quantifies an enrichment of the user-defined set of genes in the target of clinical indication categories and (ii) captures potentially repositionable drugs targeting the gene set. By applying GREP to a large-scale GWAS of stroke, a gene expression analysis on human tissues, and somatic mutations in cancers, we show that genes implicated in the GWAS were robustly enriched in the indicated medications for the trait of interest. GREP also unraveled new insights into the biology of the tissue-specific gene expression and the genetic landscape of cancers.

2 Materials and methods

The overview of our method is shown in Figure 1a. We have collected and curated target chemical information on medications of current use or developed in the past, from two major drug databases, Drug Bank (Wishart ) and Therapeutic Target Database (Li ). The detailed process for the curation is described in Supplementary Material, and the source code for reformatting the downloaded drug database is distributed with the software so that users can update drug database information on their own. Target chemical information was converted to gene symbols, which made information on 22 300 drugs and 2029 genes of their target in total. We next categorized these drugs by their clinical indication for treatment based on the two widely used classification systems Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System (ATC), World Health Organization (WHO) and International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD10) diagnostic code.
Fig. 1.

The overview of GREP and its application to GWAS and cancer somatic mutations. (a) Schematic presentation of GREP software. TTD, Therapeutic Target Database; ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification; ICD10, International Classification of Diseases 10. (b) Enrichment analysis of stroke-risk suggestive genes by GREP. The inset shows the approved drugs targeting the gene set and their current indications. MI, myocardial infarction; PE, pulmonary embolism; DVT, deep vein thrombosis. (c) Comparative enrichment analysis of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes by GREP. Each circle represents an enrichment P value of the drug indication category by ICD10

The overview of GREP and its application to GWAS and cancer somatic mutations. (a) Schematic presentation of GREP software. TTD, Therapeutic Target Database; ATC, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification; ICD10, International Classification of Diseases 10. (b) Enrichment analysis of stroke-risk suggestive genes by GREP. The inset shows the approved drugs targeting the gene set and their current indications. MI, myocardial infarction; PE, pulmonary embolism; DVT, deep vein thrombosis. (c) Comparative enrichment analysis of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes by GREP. Each circle represents an enrichment P value of the drug indication category by ICD10 Using a text file of genes as a user input together with these pre-formatted databases, the GREP software automatically performs a series of Fisher’s exact tests to examine whether the gene set is enriched in genes targeted by drugs in a clinical indication category [by ATC or ICD10] to treat a certain disease or condition. Further, GREP outputs the names of the drugs targeting the gene set, which are thus considered to have an association with the basis on which the gene set was selected. Our method is novel in that (i) users can input a gene set of any origin, and (ii) the drugs in the database are organized by their clinical indications, so as to grasp the whole picture of the pharmacological enrichment. We note that our implementation to identify pharmacologically associated drug indication classes or anatomical classes from the flexible gene set is the novel feature when compared with the previous gene-drug-disease databases (as in Koscielny ). GREP is implemented as a python module and runs all the analysis in a few seconds on Linux or Mac OS environment. The benchmarking shows that the standard GREP analysis takes 1.71 s on MacBook Pro (2.4 GHz, Intel Core i7) using a single CPU. To underscore the applicability of our tool, we tested a wide range of gene sets including large-scale GWASs, tissue-specific gene expression data released by GTEx Consortium (GTEx Consortium ), and a somatic mutation catalog of various cancers by COSMIC Consortium (Forbes ).

3 Results

First, as an illustrative example, we applied GREP to the risk genes identified by a recent multi-ancestry genome-wide association meta-analysis of stroke by MEGASTROKE consortium (Malik ). Using a set of 214 stroke-risk suggestive genes as an input, GREP enrichment analysis showed that these risk genes were enriched in the targets of approved medications for ‘blood and blood forming organs’ in ATC group B (odds ratio = 5.3, Fisher’s exact P value = 4.7 × 10−3; Fig. 1b) This enrichment was driven by the indicated drugs for the ‘antithrombotic therapy’, replicating the result we have reported in the original article. In addition to the enrichment, GREP also revealed that the drugs targeting the GWAS-identified genes were currently approved for stroke and other thrombotic diseases (e.g. alteplase, anistreplase cilostazol, melagatran, reteplase, streptokinase, tenecteplase and urokinase). This list of drugs would support the approved drugs’ efficacy on the indicated trait itself from genetics on one hand, and further provide a potential for repositioning the drugs if they are yet to be indicated for the trait under investigation on the other hand. We also note that the enrichment result suggests which group of drugs is likely to be supported by genetics, supposedly useful to prioritize the candidate drugs. Second, to expand the applicability of GREP from genome to transcriptome, we utilized tissue-specifically expressed genes (SEGs) obtained from GTEx expression data as an input gene set for GREP. We defined top 5% of all genes as SEGs in each tissue as described elsewhere (Finucane ). Supplementary Figure S1 illustrates in what drug categories defined by ATC the input SEGs in each tissue are enriched. Here again we observed strong associations of the tissue-SEGs and disease categories of relevance to the tissue, such as SEGs in brain cortex and drugs used for nervous system diseases, SEGs in aorta and those for cardiovascular diseases, and SEGs in stomach and colon and those indicated for alimentary tract diseases. Therefore, the drugs targeting the SEGs in each tissue are likely to be approved for treating the diseases linked to that tissue. Third, to further broaden the application to somatic mutations, we investigated whether somatically mutated genes associated with cancers have any enrichment in known drug indications. By separately assessing oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, while both of the gene sets showed the strongest enrichment in the medications to treat malignant neoplasms, we highlighted the striking contrast of the strength in enrichment, oncogenes being much stronger (Fig. 1c). This observation would recapitulate the fact that current anti-cancer drugs are rationally designed to alter or suppress aberrant oncogene activity (Yildirim ), and might further help researchers respond to an emergent need for new strategies to target tumor suppressor genes (Ashworth ). As a potential limitation, we note that the current version of the software does not account for the directional effects of both genes and drugs. Future implementation of such information with the advent of comprehensive catalog of the functional annotation of variants and drug databases would make our method further fine-tuned and practical for repurposing.

4 Conclusions

We implemented an easy-to-use standalone software, GREP and successfully depicted the relationships between a wide range of genomic knowledge and clinical indication categories of medications of current use. Further, this software should guide investigators to determine the best path forward for the efficient drug discovery. Click here for additional data file.
  12 in total

1.  Drug-target network.

Authors:  Muhammed A Yildirim; Kwang-Il Goh; Michael E Cusick; Albert-László Barabási; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 54.908

2.  The support of human genetic evidence for approved drug indications.

Authors:  Matthew R Nelson; Hannah Tipney; Jeffery L Painter; Judong Shen; Paola Nicoletti; Yufeng Shen; Aris Floratos; Pak Chung Sham; Mulin Jun Li; Junwen Wang; Lon R Cardon; John C Whittaker; Philippe Sanseau
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Open Targets: a platform for therapeutic target identification and validation.

Authors:  Gautier Koscielny; Peter An; Denise Carvalho-Silva; Jennifer A Cham; Luca Fumis; Rippa Gasparyan; Samiul Hasan; Nikiforos Karamanis; Michael Maguire; Eliseo Papa; Andrea Pierleoni; Miguel Pignatelli; Theo Platt; Francis Rowland; Priyanka Wankar; A Patrícia Bento; Tony Burdett; Antonio Fabregat; Simon Forbes; Anna Gaulton; Cristina Yenyxe Gonzalez; Henning Hermjakob; Anne Hersey; Steven Jupe; Şenay Kafkas; Maria Keays; Catherine Leroy; Francisco-Javier Lopez; Maria Paula Magarinos; James Malone; Johanna McEntyre; Alfonso Munoz-Pomer Fuentes; Claire O'Donovan; Irene Papatheodorou; Helen Parkinson; Barbara Palka; Justin Paschall; Robert Petryszak; Naruemon Pratanwanich; Sirarat Sarntivijal; Gary Saunders; Konstantinos Sidiropoulos; Thomas Smith; Zbyslaw Sondka; Oliver Stegle; Y Amy Tang; Edward Turner; Brendan Vaughan; Olga Vrousgou; Xavier Watkins; Maria-Jesus Martin; Philippe Sanseau; Jessica Vamathevan; Ewan Birney; Jeffrey Barrett; Ian Dunham
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Genetic interactions in cancer progression and treatment.

Authors:  Alan Ashworth; Christopher J Lord; Jorge S Reis-Filho
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery.

Authors:  Yukinori Okada; Di Wu; Gosia Trynka; Towfique Raj; Chikashi Terao; Katsunori Ikari; Yuta Kochi; Koichiro Ohmura; Akari Suzuki; Shinji Yoshida; Robert R Graham; Arun Manoharan; Ward Ortmann; Tushar Bhangale; Joshua C Denny; Robert J Carroll; Anne E Eyler; Jeffrey D Greenberg; Joel M Kremer; Dimitrios A Pappas; Lei Jiang; Jian Yin; Lingying Ye; Ding-Feng Su; Jian Yang; Gang Xie; Ed Keystone; Harm-Jan Westra; Tõnu Esko; Andres Metspalu; Xuezhong Zhou; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Mirel; Eli A Stahl; Dorothée Diogo; Jing Cui; Katherine Liao; Michael H Guo; Keiko Myouzen; Takahisa Kawaguchi; Marieke J H Coenen; Piet L C M van Riel; Mart A F J van de Laar; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Tom W J Huizinga; Philippe Dieudé; Xavier Mariette; S Louis Bridges; Alexandra Zhernakova; Rene E M Toes; Paul P Tak; Corinne Miceli-Richard; So-Young Bang; Hye-Soon Lee; Javier Martin; Miguel A Gonzalez-Gay; Luis Rodriguez-Rodriguez; Solbritt Rantapää-Dahlqvist; Lisbeth Arlestig; Hyon K Choi; Yoichiro Kamatani; Pilar Galan; Mark Lathrop; Steve Eyre; John Bowes; Anne Barton; Niek de Vries; Larry W Moreland; Lindsey A Criswell; Elizabeth W Karlson; Atsuo Taniguchi; Ryo Yamada; Michiaki Kubo; Jun S Liu; Sang-Cheol Bae; Jane Worthington; Leonid Padyukov; Lars Klareskog; Peter K Gregersen; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Barbara E Stranger; Philip L De Jager; Lude Franke; Peter M Visscher; Matthew A Brown; Hisashi Yamanaka; Tsuneyo Mimori; Atsushi Takahashi; Huji Xu; Timothy W Behrens; Katherine A Siminovitch; Shigeki Momohara; Fumihiko Matsuda; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Robert M Plenge
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations.

Authors:  Danielle Welter; Jacqueline MacArthur; Joannella Morales; Tony Burdett; Peggy Hall; Heather Junkins; Alan Klemm; Paul Flicek; Teri Manolio; Lucia Hindorff; Helen Parkinson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Therapeutic target database update 2018: enriched resource for facilitating bench-to-clinic research of targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Ying Hong Li; Chun Yan Yu; Xiao Xu Li; Peng Zhang; Jing Tang; Qingxia Yang; Tingting Fu; Xiaoyu Zhang; Xuejiao Cui; Gao Tu; Yang Zhang; Shuang Li; Fengyuan Yang; Qiu Sun; Chu Qin; Xian Zeng; Zhe Chen; Yu Zong Chen; Feng Zhu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  COSMIC: somatic cancer genetics at high-resolution.

Authors:  Simon A Forbes; David Beare; Harry Boutselakis; Sally Bamford; Nidhi Bindal; John Tate; Charlotte G Cole; Sari Ward; Elisabeth Dawson; Laura Ponting; Raymund Stefancsik; Bhavana Harsha; Chai Yin Kok; Mingming Jia; Harry Jubb; Zbyslaw Sondka; Sam Thompson; Tisham De; Peter J Campbell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues.

Authors:  Alexis Battle; Christopher D Brown; Barbara E Engelhardt; Stephen B Montgomery
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Heritability enrichment of specifically expressed genes identifies disease-relevant tissues and cell types.

Authors:  Hilary K Finucane; Yakir A Reshef; Verneri Anttila; Kamil Slowikowski; Alexander Gusev; Andrea Byrnes; Steven Gazal; Po-Ru Loh; Caleb Lareau; Noam Shoresh; Giulio Genovese; Arpiar Saunders; Evan Macosko; Samuela Pollack; John R B Perry; Jason D Buenrostro; Bradley E Bernstein; Soumya Raychaudhuri; Steven McCarroll; Benjamin M Neale; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 38.330

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Advancing the use of genome-wide association studies for drug repurposing.

Authors:  William R Reay; Murray J Cairns
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Genome-wide transcriptome architecture in a mouse model of Gulf War Illness.

Authors:  Fuyi Xu; David G Ashbrook; Jun Gao; Athena Starlard-Davenport; Wenyuan Zhao; Diane B Miller; James P O'Callaghan; Robert W Williams; Byron C Jones; Lu Lu
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-06-20       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  A cross-population atlas of genetic associations for 220 human phenotypes.

Authors:  Saori Sakaue; Masahiro Kanai; Yosuke Tanigawa; Juha Karjalainen; Mitja Kurki; Seizo Koshiba; Akira Narita; Takahiro Konuma; Kenichi Yamamoto; Masato Akiyama; Kazuyoshi Ishigaki; Akari Suzuki; Ken Suzuki; Wataru Obara; Ken Yamaji; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Satoshi Asai; Yasuo Takahashi; Takao Suzuki; Nobuaki Shinozaki; Hiroki Yamaguchi; Shiro Minami; Shigeo Murayama; Kozo Yoshimori; Satoshi Nagayama; Daisuke Obata; Masahiko Higashiyama; Akihide Masumoto; Yukihiro Koretsune; Kaoru Ito; Chikashi Terao; Toshimasa Yamauchi; Issei Komuro; Takashi Kadowaki; Gen Tamiya; Masayuki Yamamoto; Yusuke Nakamura; Michiaki Kubo; Yoshinori Murakami; Kazuhiko Yamamoto; Yoichiro Kamatani; Aarno Palotie; Manuel A Rivas; Mark J Daly; Koichi Matsuda; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Stroke genetics informs drug discovery and risk prediction across ancestries.

Authors:  Aniket Mishra; Rainer Malik; Tsuyoshi Hachiya; Tuuli Jürgenson; Shinichi Namba; Daniel C Posner; Frederick K Kamanu; Masaru Koido; Quentin Le Grand; Mingyang Shi; Yunye He; Marios K Georgakis; Ilana Caro; Kristi Krebs; Yi-Ching Liaw; Felix C Vaura; Kuang Lin; Bendik Slagsvold Winsvold; Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra; Livia Parodi; Hee-Joon Bae; Ganesh Chauhan; Michael R Chong; Liisa Tomppo; Rufus Akinyemi; Gennady V Roshchupkin; Naomi Habib; Yon Ho Jee; Jesper Qvist Thomassen; Vida Abedi; Jara Cárcel-Márquez; Marianne Nygaard; Hampton L Leonard; Chaojie Yang; Ekaterina Yonova-Doing; Maria J Knol; Adam J Lewis; Renae L Judy; Tetsuro Ago; Philippe Amouyel; Nicole D Armstrong; Mark K Bakker; Traci M Bartz; David A Bennett; Joshua C Bis; Constance Bordes; Sigrid Børte; Anael Cain; Paul M Ridker; Kelly Cho; Zhengming Chen; Carlos Cruchaga; John W Cole; Phil L de Jager; Rafael de Cid; Matthias Endres; Leslie E Ferreira; Mirjam I Geerlings; Natalie C Gasca; Vilmundur Gudnason; Jun Hata; Jing He; Alicia K Heath; Yuk-Lam Ho; Aki S Havulinna; Jemma C Hopewell; Hyacinth I Hyacinth; Michael Inouye; Mina A Jacob; Christina E Jeon; Christina Jern; Masahiro Kamouchi; Keith L Keene; Takanari Kitazono; Steven J Kittner; Takahiro Konuma; Amit Kumar; Paul Lacaze; Lenore J Launer; Keon-Joo Lee; Kaido Lepik; Jiang Li; Liming Li; Ani Manichaikul; Hugh S Markus; Nicholas A Marston; Thomas Meitinger; Braxton D Mitchell; Felipe A Montellano; Takayuki Morisaki; Thomas H Mosley; Mike A Nalls; Børge G Nordestgaard; Martin J O'Donnell; Yukinori Okada; N Charlotte Onland-Moret; Bruce Ovbiagele; Annette Peters; Bruce M Psaty; Stephen S Rich; Jonathan Rosand; Marc S Sabatine; Ralph L Sacco; Danish Saleheen; Else Charlotte Sandset; Veikko Salomaa; Muralidharan Sargurupremraj; Makoto Sasaki; Claudia L Satizabal; Carsten O Schmidt; Atsushi Shimizu; Nicholas L Smith; Kelly L Sloane; Yoichi Sutoh; Yan V Sun; Kozo Tanno; Steffen Tiedt; Turgut Tatlisumak; Nuria P Torres-Aguila; Hemant K Tiwari; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Stella Trompet; Anil Man Tuladhar; Anne Tybjærg-Hansen; Marion van Vugt; Riina Vibo; Shefali S Verma; Kerri L Wiggins; Patrik Wennberg; Daniel Woo; Peter W F Wilson; Huichun Xu; Qiong Yang; Kyungheon Yoon; Iona Y Millwood; Christian Gieger; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Hans J Grabe; J Wouter Jukema; Ina L Rissanen; Daniel Strbian; Young Jin Kim; Pei-Hsin Chen; Ernst Mayerhofer; Joanna M M Howson; Marguerite R Irvin; Hieab Adams; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Kaare Christensen; Mohammad A Ikram; Tatjana Rundek; Bradford B Worrall; G Mark Lathrop; Moeen Riaz; Eleanor M Simonsick; Janika Kõrv; Paulo H C França; Ramin Zand; Kameshwar Prasad; Ruth Frikke-Schmidt; Frank-Erik de Leeuw; Thomas Liman; Karl Georg Haeusler; Ynte M Ruigrok; Peter Ulrich Heuschmann; W T Longstreth; Keum Ji Jung; Lisa Bastarache; Guillaume Paré; Scott M Damrauer; Daniel I Chasman; Jerome I Rotter; Christopher D Anderson; John-Anker Zwart; Teemu J Niiranen; Myriam Fornage; Yung-Po Liaw; Sudha Seshadri; Israel Fernández-Cadenas; Robin G Walters; Christian T Ruff; Mayowa O Owolabi; Jennifer E Huffman; Lili Milani; Yoichiro Kamatani; Martin Dichgans; Stephanie Debette
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 69.504

5.  The genetic architecture of pneumonia susceptibility implicates mucin biology and a relationship with psychiatric illness.

Authors:  William R Reay; Michael P Geaghan; Murray J Cairns
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Investigation of genetic loci shared between bipolar disorder and risk-taking propensity: potential implications for pharmacological interventions.

Authors:  Claudia Pisanu; Donatella Congiu; Giovanni Severino; Raffaella Ardau; Caterina Chillotti; Maria Del Zompo; Bernhard T Baune; Alessio Squassina
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.294

7.  Prediction of New Risk Genes and Potential Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis from Multiomics Data.

Authors:  Anteneh M Birga; Liping Ren; Huaichao Luo; Yang Zhang; Jian Huang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 8.  Genomics-driven drug discovery based on disease-susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Kyuto Sonehara; Yukinori Okada
Journal:  Inflamm Regen       Date:  2021-03-10

9.  Cerebral small vessel disease genomics and its implications across the lifespan.

Authors:  Muralidharan Sargurupremraj; Hideaki Suzuki; Xueqiu Jian; Chloé Sarnowski; Tavia E Evans; Joshua C Bis; Gudny Eiriksdottir; Saori Sakaue; Natalie Terzikhan; Mohamad Habes; Wei Zhao; Nicola J Armstrong; Edith Hofer; Lisa R Yanek; Saskia P Hagenaars; Rajan B Kumar; Erik B van den Akker; Rebekah E McWhirter; Stella Trompet; Aniket Mishra; Yasaman Saba; Claudia L Satizabal; Gregory Beaudet; Laurent Petit; Ami Tsuchida; Laure Zago; Sabrina Schilling; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Rebecca F Gottesman; Cora E Lewis; Neelum T Aggarwal; Oscar L Lopez; Jennifer A Smith; Maria C Valdés Hernández; Jeroen van der Grond; Margaret J Wright; Maria J Knol; Marcus Dörr; Russell J Thomson; Constance Bordes; Quentin Le Grand; Marie-Gabrielle Duperron; Albert V Smith; David S Knopman; Pamela J Schreiner; Denis A Evans; Jerome I Rotter; Alexa S Beiser; Susana Muñoz Maniega; Marian Beekman; Julian Trollor; David J Stott; Meike W Vernooij; Katharina Wittfeld; Wiro J Niessen; Aicha Soumaré; Eric Boerwinkle; Stephen Sidney; Stephen T Turner; Gail Davies; Anbupalam Thalamuthu; Uwe Völker; Mark A van Buchem; R Nick Bryan; Josée Dupuis; Mark E Bastin; David Ames; Alexander Teumer; Philippe Amouyel; John B Kwok; Robin Bülow; Ian J Deary; Peter R Schofield; Henry Brodaty; Jiyang Jiang; Yasuharu Tabara; Kazuya Setoh; Susumu Miyamoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Manabu Nagata; Yoichiro Kamatani; Fumihiko Matsuda; Bruce M Psaty; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager; Thomas H Mosley; Perminder S Sachdev; Reinhold Schmidt; Helen R Warren; Evangelos Evangelou; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Mohammad A Ikram; Wei Wen; Charles DeCarli; Velandai K Srikanth; J Wouter Jukema; Eline P Slagboom; Sharon L R Kardia; Yukinori Okada; Bernard Mazoyer; Joanna M Wardlaw; Paul A Nyquist; Karen A Mather; Hans J Grabe; Helena Schmidt; Cornelia M Van Duijn; Vilmundur Gudnason; William T Longstreth; Lenore J Launer; Mark Lathrop; Sudha Seshadri; Christophe Tzourio; Hieab H Adams; Paul M Matthews; Myriam Fornage; Stéphanie Debette
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 17.694

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.