PURPOSE: To determine if OCT angiography (OCTA)-derived vessel density measurements can extend the available dynamic range for detecting glaucoma compared with spectral-domain (SD) OCT-derived thickness measurements. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 509 eyes from 38 healthy participants, 63 glaucoma suspects, and 193 glaucoma patients enrolled in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study. METHODS: Relative vessel density and tissue thickness measurement floors of perifoveal vessel density (pfVD), circumpapillary capillary density (cpCD), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber (cpRNFL) thickness, ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness, and visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) were investigated and compared with a previously reported linear change point model (CPM) and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated vessel density and tissue thickness measurement floors and corresponding dynamic ranges. RESULTS: Visual field MD ranged from -30.1 to 2.8 decibels (dB). No measurement floor was found for pfVD, which continued to decrease constantly until very advanced disease. A true floor (i.e., slope of approximately 0 after observed CPM change point) was detected for cpRNFL thickness only. The post-CPM estimated floors were 49.5±2.6 μm for cpRNFL thickness, 70.7±1.0 μm for GCC thickness, and 31.2±1.1% for cpCD. Perifoveal vessel density reached the post-CPM estimated floor later in the disease (VF MD, -25.8±3.8 dB) than cpCD (VF MD, -19.3±2.4 dB), cpRNFL thickness (VF MD, -17.5±3.3 dB), and GCC thickness (VF MD, -13.9±1.8 dB; P < 0.001). The number of available measurement steps from normal values to the CPM estimated floor was greatest for cpRNFL thickness (8.9), followed by GCC thickness (7.4), cpCD (4.5), and pfVD (3.8). CONCLUSIONS: In late-stage glaucoma, particularly when VF MD is worse than -14 dB, OCTA-measured pfVD is a promising tool for monitoring progression because it does not have a detectable measurement floor. However, the number of steps within the dynamic range of a parameter also needs to be considered. Although thickness parameters reached the floor earlier than OCTA-measured pfVD, there are more such steps with thickness than OCTA parameters.
PURPOSE: To determine if OCT angiography (OCTA)-derived vessel density measurements can extend the available dynamic range for detecting glaucoma compared with spectral-domain (SD) OCT-derived thickness measurements. DESIGN: Observational, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 509 eyes from 38 healthy participants, 63 glaucoma suspects, and 193 glaucomapatients enrolled in the Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study. METHODS: Relative vessel density and tissue thickness measurement floors of perifoveal vessel density (pfVD), circumpapillary capillary density (cpCD), circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber (cpRNFL) thickness, ganglion cell complex (GCC) thickness, and visual field (VF) mean deviation (MD) were investigated and compared with a previously reported linear change point model (CPM) and locally weighted scatterplot smoothing curves. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estimated vessel density and tissue thickness measurement floors and corresponding dynamic ranges. RESULTS:Visual field MD ranged from -30.1 to 2.8 decibels (dB). No measurement floor was found for pfVD, which continued to decrease constantly until very advanced disease. A true floor (i.e., slope of approximately 0 after observed CPM change point) was detected for cpRNFL thickness only. The post-CPM estimated floors were 49.5±2.6 μm for cpRNFL thickness, 70.7±1.0 μm for GCC thickness, and 31.2±1.1% for cpCD. Perifoveal vessel density reached the post-CPM estimated floor later in the disease (VF MD, -25.8±3.8 dB) than cpCD (VF MD, -19.3±2.4 dB), cpRNFL thickness (VF MD, -17.5±3.3 dB), and GCC thickness (VF MD, -13.9±1.8 dB; P < 0.001). The number of available measurement steps from normal values to the CPM estimated floor was greatest for cpRNFL thickness (8.9), followed by GCC thickness (7.4), cpCD (4.5), and pfVD (3.8). CONCLUSIONS: In late-stage glaucoma, particularly when VF MD is worse than -14 dB, OCTA-measured pfVD is a promising tool for monitoring progression because it does not have a detectable measurement floor. However, the number of steps within the dynamic range of a parameter also needs to be considered. Although thickness parameters reached the floor earlier than OCTA-measured pfVD, there are more such steps with thickness than OCTA parameters.
Authors: Jayasree P Venugopal; Harsha L Rao; Robert N Weinreb; Zia S Pradhan; Srilakshmi Dasari; Mohammed Riyazuddin; Narenda K Puttiah; Dhanraj A S Rao; Sathi Devi; Kaweh Mansouri; Carroll Ab Webers Journal: Br J Ophthalmol Date: 2017-07-24 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Dorothy Sk Ng; Peggy Pc Chiang; Gavin Tan; Cm Gemmy Cheung; Ching-Yu Cheng; Carol Y Cheung; Tien Y Wong; Ecosse L Lamoureux; Mohammad K Ikram Journal: Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 4.207
Authors: Harsha L Rao; Zia S Pradhan; Robert N Weinreb; Hemanth B Reddy; Mohammed Riyazuddin; Srilakshmi Dasari; Meena Palakurthy; Narendra K Puttaiah; Dhanaraj A S Rao; Carroll A B Webers Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Adeleh Yarmohammadi; Linda M Zangwill; Alberto Diniz-Filho; Min Hee Suh; Patricia Isabel Manalastas; Naeem Fatehee; Siamak Yousefi; Akram Belghith; Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; David Huang; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Liang Liu; Ou Tan; Eliesa Ing; John C Morrison; Beth Edmunds; Ellen Davis; Seema Gupta; Lorinna H Lombardi; Yali Jia; David Huang Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2019-11-23 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Huiyuan Hou; Sasan Moghimi; James A Proudfoot; Elham Ghahari; Rafaella C Penteado; Christopher Bowd; Diya Yang; Robert N Weinreb Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2020-01-13 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Mark J Phillips; Duyen Dinh-Dang; Kyle Bolo; Bruce Burkemper; Jae C Lee; Vivian H LeTran; Brenda R Chang; Dominic J Grisafe; Zhongdi Chu; Xiao Zhou; Brian J Song; Benjamin Y Xu; Brandon Wong; Ruikang K Wang; Grace M Richter Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Tristan T Hormel; Yali Jia; Yifan Jian; Thomas S Hwang; Steven T Bailey; Mark E Pennesi; David J Wilson; John C Morrison; David Huang Journal: Prog Retin Eye Res Date: 2020-07-24 Impact factor: 21.198
Authors: Christopher Bowd; Akram Belghith; Mark Christopher; Michael H Goldbaum; Massimo A Fazio; Christopher A Girkin; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 3.048