PRéCIS:: Optical and ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably in young, healthy adults. In elderly, healthy and glaucoma patients the speed of ultrasound in the cornea increases because of changing corneal biomechanical characteristics in age and disease and the different devices could be used interchangeably. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using optical and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma and young as well as elderly, healthy controls. Further to investigate whether the devices could be used interchangeably. METHODS: In total, 69 eyes of 41 glaucoma patients, 51 eyes of 32 elderly and 50 eyes of 25 young controls were consecutively included in this cross-sectional observational study. Optical CCT measurements were obtained using the noncontact Specular Microscope CEM-530 (NCSM). Ultrasound pachymetry (USP) was measured using the Pachy Meter SP 3000. RESULTS: In young subjects (27.2±4.8 y), the mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 562.1±33.6 μm and 565.8±35.8 μm, respectively. This was significantly different (USP>NCSM, P=0.019). In elderly subjects (70.6±10.7 y) CCT measured with NCSM (562.5±27.8 μm) compared to USP (564.9±27.1 μm) was not statistically significantly different (P= 0.121). In glaucoma patients (65.0±11.1 y), USP measured thinner CCT values compared to NCSM, without significant differences between the devices (NCSM 525.3±32.3 μm; USP 522.9±33.15 μm; P=0.067). CCT was significantly thinner in comparison to both healthy groups (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In young subjects, ultrasound pachymetry measurements are higher than they are with optical pachymetry. This difference is no longer observed in elderly subjects and is even reversed in glaucoma patients. A higher speed of ultrasound in the cornea due to changing corneal biomechanical properties in the elderly and glaucoma patients could explain this. The devices could be used interchangeably in older and glaucoma patients, but not in young individuals.
PRéCIS:: Optical and ultrasound pachymetry cannot be used interchangeably in young, healthy adults. In elderly, healthy and glaucomapatients the speed of ultrasound in the cornea increases because of changing corneal biomechanical characteristics in age and disease and the different devices could be used interchangeably. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using optical and ultrasound pachymetry in patients with open-angle glaucoma and young as well as elderly, healthy controls. Further to investigate whether the devices could be used interchangeably. METHODS: In total, 69 eyes of 41 glaucomapatients, 51 eyes of 32 elderly and 50 eyes of 25 young controls were consecutively included in this cross-sectional observational study. Optical CCT measurements were obtained using the noncontact Specular Microscope CEM-530 (NCSM). Ultrasound pachymetry (USP) was measured using the Pachy Meter SP 3000. RESULTS: In young subjects (27.2±4.8 y), the mean CCT taken with NCSM and USP was 562.1±33.6 μm and 565.8±35.8 μm, respectively. This was significantly different (USP>NCSM, P=0.019). In elderly subjects (70.6±10.7 y) CCT measured with NCSM (562.5±27.8 μm) compared to USP (564.9±27.1 μm) was not statistically significantly different (P= 0.121). In glaucomapatients (65.0±11.1 y), USP measured thinner CCT values compared to NCSM, without significant differences between the devices (NCSM 525.3±32.3 μm; USP 522.9±33.15 μm; P=0.067). CCT was significantly thinner in comparison to both healthy groups (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In young subjects, ultrasound pachymetry measurements are higher than they are with optical pachymetry. This difference is no longer observed in elderly subjects and is even reversed in glaucomapatients. A higher speed of ultrasound in the cornea due to changing corneal biomechanical properties in the elderly and glaucomapatients could explain this. The devices could be used interchangeably in older and glaucomapatients, but not in young individuals.