Literature DB >> 30852704

Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury.

Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen1,2, Steen Fjord Pedersen3, Steen Bønløkke Pedersen4, Hans Erik Bøtker5, Won Yong Kim6,7.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to validate by histopathology, contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for the assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk (AAR) in the presence of microvascular obstruction (MVO). Eleven anesthetized pigs underwent CMR 7 to 10 days post infarction. The area-at-risk was measured from T2-weighted fast spin echo (T2-STIR) and contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession magnetic resonance imaging (CE-SSFP) images using semi-automated algorithms based on a priori knowledge of perfusion territory. Also, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was performed to measure final infarct size (FIS). Histopathological comparison with Evans blue dye to define AAR and triphenyltetrazolium chloride to define FIS served as the reference. All infarcts demonstrated MVO on LGE images. Bland-Altman analysis showed no significant bias in AAR or myocardial salvage between T2-STIR and CE-SSFP or between CMR and histopathology. The mean differences ± 2SD from Bland-Altman analysis were: AAR: Evans Blue vs. T2-STIR [0.7%; + 13.5%; - 12.1%]; AAR: Evans Blue vs. CE-SSFP [0.1%; + 13.8%; - 13.7%]; AAR: T2-STIR vs. CE-SSFP [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.8%; + 11.1%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: Evans Blue - TTC vs. CE-SSFP-LGE [0.1%; + 9.9%; - 9.6%]; Salvage: CE-SSFP-LGE vs. T2-STIR-LGE [0.7%; + 6.2%; - 4.9%]. Both T2-STIR and CE-SSFP sequences allow for unbiased quantification of AAR in the presence of ischemia/reperfusion injury when analysed by semi-automated algorithms. These experimental data, which was validated by histopathology, supports the use of CMR for the assessment of myocardial salvage during the subacute phase.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Edema; Final infarct size; Magnetic resonance imaging; Myocardium at risk; Salvage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30852704     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01569-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  14 in total

1.  Signal-to-noise ratio behavior of steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Scott B Reeder; Daniel A Herzka; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Measuring myocardial salvage.

Authors:  Hans Erik Bøtker; Anne Kjer Kaltoft; Steen Fjord Pedersen; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 10.787

3.  Semi-automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jane Sjögren; Joey F A Ubachs; Henrik Engblom; Marcus Carlsson; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 4.  Controversies in cardiovascular MR imaging: T2-weighted imaging should not be used to delineate the area at risk in ischemic myocardial injury.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Han W Kim; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  CMR imaging of edema in myocardial infarction using cine balanced steady-state free precession.

Authors:  Andreas Kumar; Nirat Beohar; Jain Mangalathu Arumana; Eric Larose; Debiao Li; Matthias G Friedrich; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-12

6.  Assessment of myocardium at risk with contrast enhanced steady-state free precession cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance compared to single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Peder Sörensson; Einar Heiberg; Nawsad Saleh; Frederic Bouvier; Kenneth Caidahl; Per Tornvall; Lars Rydén; John Pernow; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Automated quantification of myocardial infarction from MR images by accounting for partial volume effects: animal, phantom, and human study.

Authors:  Einar Heiberg; Martin Ugander; Henrik Engblom; Matthias Götberg; Göran K Olivecrona; David Erlinge; Håkan Arheden
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Myocardial edema after ischemia/reperfusion is not stable and follows a bimodal pattern: imaging and histological tissue characterization.

Authors:  Rodrigo Fernández-Jiménez; Javier Sánchez-González; Jaume Agüero; Jaime García-Prieto; Gonzalo J López-Martín; José M García-Ruiz; Antonio Molina-Iracheta; Xavier Rosselló; Leticia Fernández-Friera; Gonzalo Pizarro; Ana García-Álvarez; Erica Dall'Armellina; Carlos Macaya; Robin P Choudhury; Valentin Fuster; Borja Ibáñez
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Relationship of T2-Weighted MRI Myocardial Hyperintensity and the Ischemic Area-At-Risk.

Authors:  Han W Kim; Lowie Van Assche; Robert B Jennings; W Benjamin Wince; Christoph J Jensen; Wolfgang G Rehwald; David C Wendell; Lubna Bhatti; Deneen M Spatz; Michele A Parker; Elizabeth R Jenista; Igor Klem; Anna Lisa C Crowley; Enn-Ling Chen; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Automatic segmentation of myocardium at risk from contrast enhanced SSFP CMR: validation against expert readers and SPECT.

Authors:  Jane Tufvesson; Marcus Carlsson; Anthony H Aletras; Henrik Engblom; Jean-François Deux; Sasha Koul; Peder Sörensson; John Pernow; Dan Atar; David Erlinge; Håkan Arheden; Einar Heiberg
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 1.930

View more
  4 in total

1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2019 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Johan H C Reiber; Gabriel T R Pereira; Luis A P Dallan; Hiram G Bezerra; Johan De Sutter; Arthur E Stillman; Nico R L Van de Veire; Joachim Lotz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  CMR for myocardial characterization in ischemic heart disease: state-of-the-art and future developments.

Authors:  Tilman Emrich; Moritz Halfmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Veno-occlusive unloading of the heart reduces infarct size in experimental ischemia-reperfusion.

Authors:  Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen; Tobias Lynge Madsen; Gregory Wood; Asger Granfeldt; Nikolaj Bøgh; Bawer Jalal Tofig; Peter Agger; Jakob Lykke Lindhardt; Christian Bo Poulsen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Clinical presentation and cardiac imaging findings in patient cases of perimyocarditis and pericarditis with a temporal association to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Authors:  Anders Lehmann Dahl Pedersen; Gregory Wood; Christian Alcaraz Frederiksen; Brian Bridal Løgstrup; Morten Kvistholm Jensen; Lars Østergaard; Won Yong Kim; Steen Hvitfeldt Poulsen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-08-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.