Literature DB >> 22311720

Measuring myocardial salvage.

Hans Erik Bøtker1, Anne Kjer Kaltoft, Steen Fjord Pedersen, Won Yong Kim.   

Abstract

The efficacy of cardioprotective strategies can be quantified by myocardial salvage as an indicator of therapeutic benefit. Salvage is calculated as the difference between the area at risk (AAR) and the final infarct size (FIS). AAR has been quantified by angiographic assessment followed by quantification of FIS by biochemical ischaemic markers or imaging modalities such as cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Angiographical methods may overestimate AAR and since methodological differences may exist between different modalities, the use of different modalities for estimating AAR and FIS may not be recommended. (99m)Technetium (Tc)-Sestamibi single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) allows quantification of AAR and FIS by tracer injection prior to revascularization and after 1 month, respectively. SPECT provides the most validated measure of myocardial salvage and has been utilized in multiple randomized clinical trials. However, SPECT is logistically challenging, expensive, and includes radiation exposure. More recently, a large number of studies have suggested that CMR can determine salvage in a single examination by combining measures of myocardial oedema in the AAR exposed to ischaemia reperfusion with FIS quantification by late gadolinium enhancement. The T1- and T2-weighted CMR approaches for quantification of AAR utilize non-contrast, early and late gadolinium enhancement techniques. The technical progress, high spatial resolution and the potential for retrospective quantification of the AAR makes CMR the most appropriate technique for assessment of myocardial salvage. However, the optimum CMR technique for assessment of myocardial AAR remains to be defined. Consequently, we recommend a comprehensive CMR protocol to ensure reliable assessment of myocardial salvage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311720     DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvs081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  25 in total

1.  Could 82Rb-PET be the next best thing in evaluation of myocardial salvage?

Authors:  Efstathia Andrikopoulou; Steven G Lloyd
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Validation of contrast enhanced cine steady-state free precession and T2-weighted CMR for assessment of ischemic myocardial area-at-risk in the presence of reperfusion injury.

Authors:  Esben Søvsø Szocska Hansen; Steen Fjord Pedersen; Steen Bønløkke Pedersen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Won Yong Kim
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  TNF-α blockade improves early post-resuscitation survival and hemodynamics in a swine model of ischemic ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  James T Niemann; Scott T Youngquist; Atman P Shah; Joseph L Thomas; John P Rosborough
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 4.  Remote ischemic conditioning.

Authors:  Gerd Heusch; Hans Erik Bøtker; Karin Przyklenk; Andrew Redington; Derek Yellon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Quantifying the Area at Risk in Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Using Hybrid Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Steven K White; Georg M Fröhlich; Steven G Casson; Celia O'Meara; Ayla Newton; Jennifer Nicholas; Peter Weale; Simon M Y Wan; Alex Sirker; James C Moon; Derek M Yellon; Ashley Groves; Leon Menezes; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 7.792

6.  Durable Benefits of Cellular Postconditioning: Long-Term Effects of Allogeneic Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Infused After Reperfusion in Pigs with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Hideaki Kanazawa; Eleni Tseliou; James F Dawkins; Geoffrey De Couto; Romain Gallet; Konstantinos Malliaras; Kristine Yee; Michelle Kreke; Ileana Valle; Rachel R Smith; Ryan C Middleton; Chak-Sum Ho; Rohan Dharmakumar; Debiao Li; Raj R Makkar; Keiichi Fukuda; Linda Marbán; Eduardo Marbán
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Radionuclide imaging of jeopardized myocardium: From the beginning of the race to the finish line.

Authors:  Valeria Gaudieri; Carmela Nappi; Mario Petretta
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Recent Advances, Controversies, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Heerajnarain Bulluck; Rohan Dharmakumar; Andrew E Arai; Colin Berry; Derek J Hausenloy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Myocardial infarction area quantification using high-resolution SPECT images in rats.

Authors:  Luciano Fonseca Lemos de Oliveira; Jorge Mejia; Eduardo Elias Vieira de Carvalho; Renata Maria Lataro; Sarita Nasbine Frassetto; Rubens Fazan; Hélio Cesar Salgado; Orfa Yineth Galvis-Alonso; Marcus Vinícius Simões
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 10.  The challenge of translating ischemic conditioning from animal models to humans: the role of comorbidities.

Authors:  Kieran McCafferty; Suzanne Forbes; Christoph Thiemermann; Muhammad M Yaqoob
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.