| Literature DB >> 30849984 |
Phanankosi Moyo1, Phaladi Kunyane2, Mamoalosi A Selepe2, Jacobus N Eloff3, Jandeli Niemand1, Abraham I Louw1, Vinesh J Maharaj2, Lyn-Marie Birkholtz4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal adoption of the malaria transmission-blocking strategy is currently limited by lack of safe and efficacious drugs. This has sparked the exploration of different sources of drugs in search of transmission-blocking agents. While plant species have been extensively investigated in search of malaria chemotherapeutic agents, comparatively less effort has been channelled towards exploring them in search of transmission-blocking drugs. Artemisia afra (Asteraceae), a prominent feature of South African folk medicine, is used for the treatment of a number of diseases, including malaria. In search of transmission-blocking compounds aimed against Plasmodium parasites, the current study endeavoured to isolate and identify gametocytocidal compounds from A. afra.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisia afra; Gametocytes; Malaria; Natural products; Plasmodium falciparum; Sesquiterpene lactone; Transmission-blocking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30849984 PMCID: PMC6408838 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-019-2694-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Bioassay-guided fractionation and isolation of gametocytocidal compounds 1 and 2 from Artemisia afra. Inhibition of in vitro viability of late-stage gametocytes (1.2–1.6% gametocytaemia, n = 1) of P. falciparum (NF54 strain) by crude extract and fractions of Artemisia afra, realised from a solvent–solvent partitioning step and b separation of chloroform fraction (column 1). c Typical microscopic pictures of macrogametocytes (condensed nuclei) and microgametocytes (scattered nuclei) used in pLDH assays. Full dose–response investigation of compound d 1 and e 2 against late stage gametocytes (1–2% gametocytaemia) of P. falciparum. IC50 values (μM), determined using the 72 + 72 h pLDH assay. Data are the mean ± SEM of three independent biological repeats in technical triplicates. Positive drug control for inhibition of viability of late-stage gametocytes were methylene blue and artemisinin. *Unpaired assays (n = 1, each carried out in technical triplicate, see Additional file 1: Fig. S2). MB methylene blue, Hex hexane, CE crude extract, Chl chloroform, EtOAc ethyl acetate, MeOH methanol, ART artemisinin
Fig. 2Pan-reactivity and cytotoxic investigations of Artemisia afra chloroform fraction, compounds 1 and 2. a IC50 values (μM), determined using the pLDH assay for asexuals (1% parasitaemia) and gametocytes (1–2% gametocytaemia), respectively. Data are the mean ± SEM of three independent biological repeats each done in technical triplicate. n = 2 for all asexual assays. Statistically significant differences between the IC50 values are indicated (*P < 0.05, unpaired Student’s t-test). b Cytotoxicity was investigated by the standard mammalian LDH leakage assay, with emetine used as positive reference control. *Unpaired assays (n = 3, each carried out in technical duplicate). Data are the mean ± SEM of three independent biological repeat experiments each performed in technical triplicate
13C and 1H NMR spectroscopic data for compounds 1 and 2 in CDCl3
| Po | Compound 1 | Compound 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| δ | δH ( | δC | δH ( | |
| 1 | 85.4 | – | 76.5 | – |
| 2 | 134.4 | 5.62 (1H, d, 5.6) | 58.5 | 3.67 (1H, brsb) |
| 3 | 140.6 | 6.00 (1H, d, 5.6) | 57.0 | 3.27 (1H, brsb) |
| 4 | 82.3 | – | 70.0 | – |
| 5 | 66.3 | 2.51 (1H, d, 11.4) | 44.6 | 2.85 (1H, d, 10.8) |
| 6 | 78.1 | 4.16 (1H, dd, 8.5, 11.4) | 76.5 | 4.24 (1H, t, 10.0) |
| 7 | 45.0 | 3.63–3.70 (1H, m) | 48.9 | 3.67–3.77 (1H, m) |
| 8 | 74.5 | 4.86–4.93 (1H, m) | 71.5a | 5.25 (1H, m) |
| 9 | 36.4 | 2.90 (1H, dd, 6.0, 12.0) | 44.0 | 2.41 (1H, dd, 7.1, 16.5) |
| 10 | 143.0 | – | 71.2a | – |
| 11 | 135.5 | – | 137.4 | – |
| 12 | 169.7a | – | 169.3 | – |
| 13 | 125.3 | 6.32 (1H, d, 3.4) | 121.5 | 6.21 (1H, d, 3.1) |
| 14 | 117.4 | 5.13 (1H, brs) | 26.6 | 1.10 (3H, s) |
| 15 | 24.2 | 1.32 (3H, s) | 20.2 | 1.56 (3H, s) |
| –OAc (CH3) | 21.1 | 2.14 (3H, s) | 21.3 | 2.13 (3H, s) |
| –OAc (–C=O) | 169.9a | – | 170.0 | – |
aSignals can be interchanged
bSignals appear as broad singlets due to poor resolution
Fig. 3Chemical structure of a compound 1, 1α,4α-dihydroxybishopsolicepolide and b selected HMBC and COSY correlations
Fig. 4Chemical structure of a compound 2, yomogiartemin and b selected HMBC and COSY correlations