| Literature DB >> 25994518 |
Janette Reader1, Mariëtte Botha2, Anjo Theron3, Sonja B Lauterbach4, Claire Rossouw5, Dewaldt Engelbrecht6, Melanie Wepener7, Annél Smit8, Didier Leroy9, Dalu Mancama10, Theresa L Coetzer11, Lyn-Marie Birkholtz12.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The discovery of malaria transmission-blocking compounds is seen as key to malaria elimination strategies and gametocyte-screening platforms are critical filters to identify active molecules. However, unlike asexual parasite assays measuring parasite proliferation, greater variability in end-point readout exists between different gametocytocidal assays. This is compounded by difficulties in routinely producing viable, functional and stage-specific gametocyte populations. Here, a parallel evaluation of four assay platforms on the same gametocyte populations was performed for the first time. This allowed the direct comparison of the ability of different assay platforms to detect compounds with gametocytocidal activity and revealed caveats in some assay readouts that interrogate different parasite biological functions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25994518 PMCID: PMC4449569 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-015-0718-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Induction of in vitro gametocytogenesis in P. falciparum parasites under various conditions
| Conditions | Gametocytaemiaa | Conversion Factorb | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaking vs. stationary (serum medium) | |||
| Asexual culture | Gametocyte culture | ||
| Stationary | Stationary | 1.3 ± 0.6 % ( | 15.8 ± 0.6 % |
| Shaking | Stationary | 3.3 ± 1.4 % ( | 34.2 ± 3.4 % |
| Medium composition (asexual, stationary gametocyte cultures) | |||
| Asexual culture | Gametocyte culture | ||
| AlbuMAX | AlbuMAX | 5.1 ± 1.0 % ( | 33.3 ± 1.9 % |
| Serum | 1.9 ± 0.8 % ( | 8.2 ± 2.2 % | |
| Serum | AlbuMAX | 3.7 ± 1 ( | 22.7 ± 1.1 % |
| Serum | 1.3 ± 0.6 % ( | 20.7 ± 3.3 % | |
| Asexual parasite elimination | |||
| Using sorbitol | 5.3 ± 0.2 % ( | 32.3 ± 1.4 % | |
| Using NAG | 4.9 ± 1.0 % ( | 37.7 ± 1.7 % | |
| Different strains of | |||
| NF54 | 4.9 ± 1.0 % ( | 35.0 ± 1.7 % | |
| 3D7 | 1.5 ± 0.2 % ( | 11.2 ± 2.0 % | |
| W2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 % ( | 8.9 ± 0.5 % | |
| 7G8 | 1 ± 0.7 % ( | ND | |
| FCR3 | 0 % ( | NA | |
| HB3 | 0 % ( | NA | |
ND not detected / determined, NA not applicable
a Day 11 after induction
b
Data are representative of (n) biological experiments, each performed in triplicate, ± SEM. Data indicate maximal levels of gametocytaemia obtained
Fig. 1Evaluation of P. falciparum gametocyte production. Parasites (NF54 P. falciparum) were cultured in medium with 0.5 % AlbuMAX for both asexual and gametocyte cultures. a Box and whisker plots of gametocytaemia (% stage III-V gametocytes) obtained with the same optimized protocol across three independent sites (site 1 n = 6; site 2 n = 17; site 3 n = 14). b Kinetics of parasitaemia (asexual stages; dashed line) and gametocytaemia (gametocytes; solid line) during gametocytogenesis. The number of asexual forms increased up to maximum parasitaemia on days 2–6 (prior to NAG treatment). Sexual forms were first detected on day 2, with gametocytaemia reaching an average of 5 % on day 11. Data are from ≥4 independent biological experiments each performed in triplicate, ± SEM
Fig. 2Stage-specific, quantitative analysis of gametocyte populations. a Giemsa-stained smears indicating morphology of different stages. b Stage distribution of gametocyte populations for 22 independent gametocyte cultures. c Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of stage-specific expression of 18 unique descriptors. PCR was performed and data normalized to cyclophillin as household expression control and expressed as fold change relative to background expression of the transcripts in asexual parasites. Data are from ≥4 independent biological experiments each performed in triplicate, from which expression ratios were determined. Under-expressed transcripts are presented in green and over-expressed transcripts in red
Fig. 3Functionality and viability of gametocytes. a Male exflagellation. White-light, Giemsa and Phalloidin stained real-time imaging of exflagellating microgamete. Visualized at 200x magnification. b Flow cytometric evaluation of asexual parasites and gametocytes by thiazole orange nuclear marker analysis. Gametocytes were purified on magnetic columns and treated with xanthurenic acid (XA) to induce exflagellation of male gametes
Performance indicators of various gametocytocidal assay platforms
| Assay performance parameters (avg) | ATP | pLDH | PrestoBlue® | Luciferase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | ( | |
| S/N | >15 000 | >300 | >900 | 16 000 (early) |
| 500 (late) | ||||
| S/B | 500 | 3.2 | 15 | 175 |
| Z’-factor (avg) | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.81 |
| %CV (intra-assay) | 8.8 % | 2.4 % | 3.15 % | 0.73 % |
| Avg DHA activity at 1 μM (% inhibition) | 37.19 ± 7.67 % | 62 ± 6 % | 83.48 ± 8.58 % | 73.56 ± 5.58 % (avg early/late) |
| IC50 DHA | 14.9 μMa | 20 nM | 11 nM | 43 nM (early) |
| 11 nM (late) | ||||
| IC50 MB | 900 nMa | 800 nM | - | 195 nM (early) |
| 143 nM (late) |
DHA Dihydroartemisinin, MB Methylene blue
aunpaired experiments at 24 h
Each assay was performed after 48 h drug exposure and comparative quality control parameters determined, utilising standardization of DHA activity as common factor between all the assay platforms. Methylene blue interferes with the PrestoBlue® assay and was not used as control. Data are from 4 independent experiments (performed in triplicate) for each assay platform
Fig. 4Comparative analysis of the performance of four assay platforms for gametocytocidal compounds. Mature stage IV/V gametocytes were assayed after 48 h continuous exposure to 1 μM drug in the four different assay platforms indicated (luciferase markers for both early (LucEG) and late gametocytes (LucLG)), based on the optimal conditions for each platform as previously indicated. The ATP data for halofantrine approximated zero. Data are of at least triplicate experiments, ± SEM