Literature DB >> 30846614

Olfactory Navigation and the Receptor Nonlinearity.

Jonathan D Victor1, Sebastian D Boie2, Erin G Connor3, John P Crimaldi3, G Bard Ermentrout4, Katherine I Nagel5.   

Abstract

The demands on a sensory system depend not only on the statistics of its inputs but also on the task. In olfactory navigation, for example, the task is to find the plume source; allocation of sensory resources may therefore be driven by aspects of the plume that are informative about source location, rather than concentration per se. Here we explore the implications of this idea for encoding odor concentration. To formalize the notion that sensory resources are limited, we considered coding strategies that partitioned the odor concentration range into a set of discriminable intervals. We developed a dynamic programming algorithm that, given the distribution of odor concentrations at several locations, determines the partitioning that conveys the most information about location. We applied this analysis to planar laser-induced fluorescence measurements of spatiotemporal odor fields with realistic advection speeds (5-20 cm/s), with or without a nearby boundary or obstacle. Across all environments, the optimal coding strategy allocated more resources (i.e., more and finer discriminable intervals) to the upper end of the concentration range than would be expected from histogram equalization, the optimal strategy if the goal were to reconstruct the plume, rather than to navigate. Finally, we show that ligand binding, as captured by the Hill equation, transforms odorant concentration into response levels in a way that approximates information maximization for navigation. This behavior occurs when the Hill dissociation constant is near the mean odor concentration, an adaptive set-point that has been observed in the olfactory system of flies.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The first step of olfactory processing is receptor binding, and the resulting relationship between odorant concentration and the bound receptor fraction is a saturating one. While this Hill nonlinearity can be viewed as a distortion that is imposed by the biophysics of receptor binding, here we show that it also plays an important information-processing role in olfactory navigation. Specifically, by combining a novel dynamic-programming algorithm with physical measurements of turbulent plumes, we determine the optimal strategy for encoding odor concentration when the goal is to determine location. This strategy is distinct from histogram equalization, the strategy that maximizes information about plume concentration, and is closely approximated by the Hill nonlinearity when the binding constant is near the ambient mean.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Keywords:  Hill equation; adaptation; dynamic programming; efficient coding; information theory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30846614      PMCID: PMC6510337          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2512-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  39 in total

1.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code.

Authors:  A L Fairhall; G D Lewen; W Bialek; R R de Ruyter Van Steveninck
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-23       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes.

Authors:  Y Tadmor; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Analysis of neural coding through quantization with an information-based distortion measure.

Authors:  Alexander G Dimitrov; John P Miller; Tomás Gedeon; Zane Aldworth; Albert E Parker
Journal:  Network       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.273

4.  Bacterial chemotaxis.

Authors:  Daniel J Webre; Peter M Wolanin; Jeffry B Stock
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Navigational decision making in Drosophila thermotaxis.

Authors:  Linjiao Luo; Marc Gershow; Mark Rosenzweig; Kyeongjin Kang; Christopher Fang-Yen; Paul A Garrity; Aravinthan D T Samuel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  'Infotaxis' as a strategy for searching without gradients.

Authors:  Massimo Vergassola; Emmanuel Villermaux; Boris I Shraiman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Emergence of complex cell properties by learning to generalize in natural scenes.

Authors:  Yan Karklin; Michael S Lewicki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Navigational strategies used by insects to find distant, wind-borne sources of odor.

Authors:  Ring T Cardé; Mark A Willis
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  The fundamental role of pirouettes in Caenorhabditis elegans chemotaxis.

Authors:  J T Pierce-Shimomura; T M Morse; S R Lockery
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Timescales of inference in visual adaptation.

Authors:  Barry Wark; Adrienne Fairhall; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  8 in total

1.  Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world.

Authors:  John Crimaldi; Hong Lei; Andreas Schaefer; Michael Schmuker; Brian H Smith; Aaron C True; Justus V Verhagen; Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Learning to predict target location with turbulent odor plumes.

Authors:  Nicola Rigolli; Nicodemo Magnoli; Lorenzo Rosasco; Agnese Seminara
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 3.  Spatial information from the odour environment in mammalian olfaction.

Authors:  Alina Cristina Marin; Andreas T Schaefer; Tobias Ackels
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 5.249

Review 4.  Adaptive temporal processing of odor stimuli.

Authors:  Sofia C Brandão; Marion Silies; Carlotta Martelli
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Experience-dependent plasticity modulates ongoing activity in the antennal lobe and enhances odor representations.

Authors:  Luis M Franco; Emre Yaksi
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 9.423

6.  Short-Term Plasticity Regulates Both Divisive Normalization and Adaptive Responses in Drosophila Olfactory System.

Authors:  Yuxuan Liu; Qianyi Li; Chao Tang; Shanshan Qin; Yuhai Tu
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 3.387

7.  Alternation emerges as a multi-modal strategy for turbulent odor navigation.

Authors:  Nicola Rigolli; Gautam Reddy; Agnese Seminara; Massimo Vergassola
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 8.  Using your nose to find your way: Ethological comparisons between human and non-human species.

Authors:  Clara U Raithel; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 9.052

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.