| Literature DB >> 30845686 |
Ran Okouchi1, Yuto Sakanoi2, Tsuyoshi Tsuduki3.
Abstract
We investigated whether the difference in miso consumption between the Japanese diets of 1975 and 2010 has influenced the observed increase in diet-induced obesity. To recreate the 2010 and 1975 Japanese high-fat diets with the corresponding proportions of miso, freeze-dried miso was added to high-fat mouse feed at 1.6% and 2.6%, respectively. When 5-week-old male Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice were provided each of these diets ad libitum for 8 weeks, it was found that the white adipose tissue weight and adipocyte area were lower in mice receiving the 1975 diet than in those receiving the 2010 diet. Therefore, high miso consumption is one reason why the 1975 Japanese diet tended to not lead to obesity. Next, the combined effects of treadmill exercise and miso consumption were investigated. The mice were divided into three groups, which were provided either a high-fat diet (group C), a high-fat diet with exercise (group C + E), or a miso-supplemented high-fat diet with exercise (group M + E) for 8 weeks. In this experiment, the white adipose tissue weight and adipocyte area in group M + E were lower than in group C. When the mRNA expression of lipid metabolism-associated genes in adipose tissue was measured, we found that expression of Hsl (lipase, hormone sensitive), which is involved in lipolysis, and Pparγ (peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma), which regulates adipocyte differentiation upstream of Hsl, was increased in group M + E. These results clearly demonstrated that lipid accumulation in the adipose tissues is suppressed by miso consumption in combination with exercise.Entities:
Keywords: anti-obesity; exercise; fermented soybean paste; miso; visceral fat accumulation
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30845686 PMCID: PMC6470805 DOI: 10.3390/nu11030560
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition of test diets (Experiment 1 and 2).
| Experiment 1 | Experiment 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Diet | 2010 Miso Diet | 1975 Miso Diet | Control Diet | Miso Diet | |
| (g/100 g) | |||||
| Casein | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 |
| Soybean oil | 6.82 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 6.82 | 6.82 |
| Lard | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 | 19.48 |
| Cornstarch | 19.24 | 19.24 | 19.24 | 19.24 | 19.24 |
| α-Cornstarch | 12.86 | 12.86 | 12.86 | 12.86 | 12.86 |
| Sucrose | 9.74 | 9.74 | 9.74 | 9.74 | 9.74 |
| Cellulose | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.87 | 4.87 |
| Mineral mix (AIN-93G-MX) | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.41 | 3.41 |
| Vitamin mix (AIN-93-VX) | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| L-Cysteine | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.29 |
| Choline bitartrate | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0.24 |
| tert-Butylhydroquinone | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 |
| Freeze-dried miso | 0.00 | 1.60 | 2.60 | 0.00 | 2.60 |
| Miso-replaced material 1 | 2.60 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 0.00 |
| (kcal/100 g) | |||||
| Energy | 491 | 491 | 491 | 491 | 491 |
1 Miso replaced material reproduced to match the nutritional composition of miso (Supplemental Table S1).
Body weights, food intake and tissue weights (Experiment 1).
| Control | 2010 Miso | 1975 Miso | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 30.1 ± 0.5 | 30.1 ± 0.5 | 30.0 ± 0.5 |
| Final body weight (g) | 46.5 ± 1.5 | 46.6 ± 2.2 | 42.4 ± 1.4 |
| Food intake (g/day) | 3.60 ± 0.04 | 3.64 ± 0.06 | 3.64 ± 0.08 |
| Energy intake (kcal/day) | 17.7 ± 0.2 | 17.9 ± 0.3 | 17.9 ± 0.4 |
| Tissue weight (g/100 g body weight) | |||
| Brain | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 1.15 ± 0.04 |
| Heart | 0.41 ± 0.02 a | 0.41 ± 0.01 a | 0.48 ± 0.02 b |
| Kidney | 1.35 ± 0.04 a | 1.37 ± 0.05 a | 1.59 ± 0.04 b |
| Liver | 3.61 ± 0.07 | 3.60 ± 0.06 | 3.63 ± 0.10 |
| Lung | 0.63 ± 0.07 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.55 ± 0.02 |
| Pancreas | 0.81 ± 0.04 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.80 ± 0.03 |
| Spleen | 0.23 ± 0.02 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.26 ± 0.02 |
| White adipose tissue | |||
| Epididymal | 3.75 ± 0.32 b | 3.66 ± 0.38 b | 2.64 ± 0.18 a |
| Mesenteric | 1.69 ± 0.14 b | 1.49 ± 0.16 b | 0.99 ± 0.11 a |
| Perinephric | 2.22 ± 0.20 b | 2.07 ± 0.19 b | 1.23 ± 0.18 a |
Values are mean ± standard error (SE), n = 10. a,b Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of dietary intake of miso on adipocyte hypertrophy. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining of epididymal adipose tissue sections from respective mice of each group (scale bar = 100 µm).
Body weights, food intake and tissue weights (Experiment 2).
| C | M | C + E | M + E | Interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (g) | 30.0 ± 0.5 | 30.0 ± 0.5 | 30.0 ± 0.5 | 30.1 ± 0.5 | |
| Final body weight (g) | 42.5 ± 1.2 | 40.4 ± 1.0 | 39.2 ± 1.0 | 38.7 ± 1.2 | |
| Food intake (g/day) | 3.62 ± 0.09 | 3.62 ± 0.06 | 3.53 ± 0.10 | 3.45 ± 0.10 | |
| Energy intake (kcal/day) | 17.8 ± 0.4 | 17.8 ± 0.3 | 17.3 ± 0.5 | 16.9 ± 0.5 | |
| Tissue weight (g/100 g body weight) | |||||
| Brain | 1.13 ± 0.03 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 1.24 ± 0.03 | 1.25 ± 0.03 | E |
| Heart | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | |
| Kidney | 1.61 ± 0.04 | 1.65 ± 0.05 | 1.74 ± 0.05 | 1.76 ± 0.05 | E |
| Liver | 3.67 ± 0.08 | 3.63 ± 0.10 | 3.56 ± 0.06 | 3.66 ± 0.10 | |
| Lung | 0.69 ± 0.06 | 0.70 ± 0.10 | 0.77 ± 0.06 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | |
| Pancreas | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 0.83 ± 0.03 | 0.84 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.04 | |
| Spleen | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.32 ± 0.03 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | |
| White adipose tissue | |||||
| Epididymal | 3.59 ± 0.39 c | 2.84 ± 0.13 b,c | 2.38 ± 0.23 a,b | 1.52 ± 0.19 a | M, E |
| Mesenteric | 1.88 ± 0.16 c | 1.64 ± 0.13 b,c | 1.25 ± 0.14 a,b | 0.81 ± 0.11 a | M, E |
| Perinephric | 2.29 ± 0.16 c | 1.73 ± 0.18 b,c | 1.42 ± 0.15 b | 0.70 ± 0.11 a | M, E |
| Skeletal muscle | |||||
| Gastrocnemius | 0.87 ± 0.02 a | 0.89 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.92 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.95 ± 0.02 b | E |
| Quadriceps | 0.95 ± 0.03 a | 1.02 ± 0.05 a,b | 1.08 ± 0.03 a,b | 1.10 ± 0.03 b | E |
| Soleus | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | M |
| Tibialis | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.01 | 0.35 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | E |
Values are mean ± SE, n = 10. Because there were two factors of miso and exercise, statistical analysis was performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for items with significant differences one-way ANOVA was performed and followed by Tukey–Kramer’s test. a,b,c Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05. Miso diet effect, exercise effect and interaction were described at the right side of the table: M, miso diet effect; E, exercise effect; M × E, interaction.
Figure 2Effect of exercise and dietary intake of miso on adipocyte hypertrophy. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of epididymal adipose tissue sections from respective mice of each group (scale bar = 100 µm).
mRNA expression level in epididymal adipose tissue (Experiment 2).
| Gene Function | Gene Name | C | M | C + E | M + E | Interaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid synthesis |
| 1.00 ± 0.15 a,b | 0.81 ± 0.14 a | 1.94 ± 0.27 c | 1.60 ± 0.23 b,c | E |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.16 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 0.82 ± 0.12 | 0.74 ± 0.10 | ||
|
| 1.00 ± 0.27 | 0.93 ± 0.23 | 0.88 ± 0.27 | 0.74 ± 0.24 | ||
|
| 1.00 ± 0.09 a,b | 0.83 ± 0.10 a | 1.22 ± 0.09 b | 1.12 ± 0.11 a,b | E | |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.13 a | 0.81 ± 0.14 a | 1.68 ± 0.29 b | 1.22 ± 0.08 a,b | E | |
| Lipolysis |
| 1.00 ± 0.17 a | 1.22 ± 0.11 a,b | 1.95 ± 0.27 b,c | 2.61 ± 0.32 c | E |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.13 a | 1.23 ± 0.08 a,b | 1.73 ± 0.24 b | 2.91 ± 0.22 c | M, E, M × E | |
| Differentiation |
| 1.00 ± 0.14 a | 1.24 ± 0.13 a | 2.04 ± 0.25 b | 3.07 ± 0.24 c | M, E |
Values are mean ± SE, n = 10. Because there were two factors of miso and exercise, statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and for items with significant differences one-way ANOVA was performed and followed by Tukey–Kramer’s test. a,b,c Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05. Miso diet effect, exercise effect and interaction were described at the right side of the table: M, miso diet effect; E, exercise effect; M × E, interaction.
Biochemical parameter of serum and liver (Experiment 2).
| C | M | C + E | M + E | Interaction | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum | |||||
| (mmol/L) | |||||
| TG | 1.06 ± 0.07 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 1.10 ± 0.12 | 0.93 ± 0.09 | |
| TC | 3.05 ± 0.21 | 2.81 ± 0.18 | 2.94 ± 0.09 | 2.77 ± 0.19 | |
| PL | 2.58 ± 0.05 | 2.51 ± 0.17 | 2.41 ± 0.14 | 2.46 ± 0.15 | |
| Glucose | 7.13 ± 0.42 b | 6.30 ± 0.19 b | 5.72 ± 0.63 a,b | 4.53 ± 0.22 a | M, E |
| (pmol/L) | |||||
| Insulin | 36.2 ± 5.4 | 36.2 ± 5.4 | 30.1 ± 5.4 | 25.2 ± 2.7 | |
| Liver | |||||
| (µmol/g) | |||||
| TG | 56.6 ± 6.7 b | 46.6 ± 3.9 b | 50.6 ± 6.4 b | 25.5 ± 2.5 a | M, E |
| TC | 20.5 ± 2.0 b | 19.4 ± 1.2 a,b | 19.0 ± 1.6 a,b | 14.4 ± 0.8 a | M, E |
| PL | 43.9 ± 1.1 | 43.8 ± 0.9 | 45.2 ± 0.6 | 44.8 ± 0.7 | |
Values are mean ± SE, n = 10. Because there were two factors of miso and exercise, statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and for items with significant differences one-way ANOVA was performed and followed by Tukey–Kramer’s test. a,b Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05. Miso diet effect, exercise effect and interaction were described at the right side of the table: M, miso diet effect; E, exercise effect; M × E, interaction. TG, Triacylglycerol; TC, Total cholesterol; PL, phospholipid.
Figure 3Effect of exercise and dietary intake of miso on liver. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of liver sections from respective mice of each group (scale bar = 100 µm).
mRNA expression level in liver (Experiment 2).
| C | M | C + E | M + E | Interaction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatty acid synthesis |
| 1.00 ± 0.19 b | 0.77 ± 0.07 a,b | 0.85 ± 0.10 b | 0.39 ± 0.04 a | M, E |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.12 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 1.05 ± 0.17 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | ||
|
| 1.00 ± 0.14 | 1.25 ± 0.14 | 1.28 ± 0.12 | 1.14 ± 0.10 | ||
|
| 1.00 ± 0.02 | 1.07 ± 0.10 | 1.21 ± 0.09 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | E | |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.11 | 0.86 ± 0.11 | 0.95 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.12 | ||
| β-oxidation |
| 1.00 ± 0.09 b | 0.93 ± 0.07 b | 0.81 ± 0.07 b | 0.39 ± 0.05 a | M, E, M × E |
|
| 1.00 ± 0.07 | 1.11 ± 0.12 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | 0.96 ± 0.05 | ||
| Cholesterol synthesis |
| 1.00 ± 0.19 b | 0.63 ± 0.12 a,b | 0.92 ± 0.15 b | 0.39 ± 0.07 a | M |
| Cholesterol catabolism |
| 1.00 ± 0.11 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | 1.02 ± 0.13 | 1.08 ± 0.12 |
Values are mean ± SE, n = 10. Because there were two factors of miso and exercise, statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA and for items with significant differences one-way ANOVA was performed and followed by Tukey-Kramer’s test. a,b Different superscript letters indicate significantly different means at p < 0.05. Miso diet effect, exercise effect and interaction were described at the right side of the table: M, miso diet effect; E, exercise effect; M × E, interaction.