Literature DB >> 30844073

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Predicts Progression to Diabetes in Autoantibody Positive Children.

Andrea K Steck1, Fran Dong1, Iman Taki1, Michelle Hoffman1, Kimber Simmons1, Brigitte I Frohnert1, Marian J Rewers1.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Accurate measures are needed for the prediction and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in at-risk persons.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in predicting T1D onset. DESIGN AND
SETTING: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) prospectively follows children at increased risk for development of islet autoantibodies (islet autoantibody positive; Ab+) and T1D. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 23 Ab+ participants with available longitudinal CGM data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CGM metrics as glycemic predictors of progression to T1D.
RESULTS: Of 23 Ab+ participants with a baseline CGM, 8 progressed to diabetes at a median age of 13.8 years during a median follow-up of 17.7 years (interquartile range, 14.6 to 22.0 years). Compared with nonprogressors, participants who progressed to diabetes had significantly increased baseline glycemic variability (SD, 29 vs 21 mg/dL; P = 0.047), daytime sensor average (122 vs 106 mg/dL; P = 0.02), and daytime sensor area under the curve (AUC, 470,370 vs 415,465; P = 0.047). They spent 24% of time at >140 mg/dL and 12% at >160 mg/dL compared with, respectively, 8% and 3% for nonprogressors (both P = 0.005). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.85 for percentage of time spent at >140 or 160 mg/dL. The cutoff of 18% time spent at >140 mg/dL had 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a 100% positive predictive value for diabetes prediction, although these values could change because some nonprogressors may develop diabetes with longer follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Eighteen percent or greater CGM time spent at >140 mg/dL predicts progression to diabetes in Ab+ children.
Copyright © 2019 Endocrine Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30844073      PMCID: PMC6589073          DOI: 10.1210/jc.2018-02196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  29 in total

1.  Markedly reduced rate of diabetic ketoacidosis at onset of type 1 diabetes in relatives screened for islet autoantibodies.

Authors:  Christiane Winkler; Edith Schober; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 4.866

2.  Increasing the accuracy of oral glucose tolerance testing and extending its application to individuals with normal glucose tolerance for the prediction of type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1.

Authors:  Jay M Sosenko; Jerry P Palmer; Carla J Greenbaum; Jeffrey Mahon; Catherine Cowie; Jeffrey P Krischer; H Peter Chase; Neil H White; Bruce Buckingham; Kevan C Herold; David Cuthbertson; Jay S Skyler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  Normal but increasing hemoglobin A1c levels predict progression from islet autoimmunity to overt type 1 diabetes: Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY).

Authors:  Lars C Stene; Katherine Barriga; Michelle Hoffman; Jaime Kean; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Jill M Norris; Henry A Erlich; George S Eisenbarth; Marian Rewers
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  Continuous glucose monitoring: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  David C Klonoff; Bruce Buckingham; Jens S Christiansen; Victor M Montori; William V Tamborlane; Robert A Vigersky; Howard Wolpert
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Beta-cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial.

Authors:  Michael W Steffes; Shalamar Sibley; Melissa Jackson; William Thomas
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  A risk score for type 1 diabetes derived from autoantibody-positive participants in the diabetes prevention trial-type 1.

Authors:  Jay M Sosenko; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jerry P Palmer; Jeffrey Mahon; Catherine Cowie; Carla J Greenbaum; David Cuthbertson; John M Lachin; Jay S Skyler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Comparison of accuracy and safety of the SEVEN and the Navigator continuous glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Clinical characteristics of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes through intensive screening and follow-up.

Authors:  Jennifer M Barker; Stephanie H Goehrig; Katherine Barriga; Michelle Hoffman; Robert Slover; George S Eisenbarth; Jill M Norris; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Marian Rewers
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  The application of the diabetes prevention trial-type 1 risk score for identifying a preclinical state of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Jay M Sosenko; Jay S Skyler; Jeffrey Mahon; Jeffrey P Krischer; Craig A Beam; David C Boulware; Carla J Greenbaum; Lisa E Rafkin; Catherine Cowie; David Cuthbertson; Jerry P Palmer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Diabetic subjects diagnosed through the Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) are often asymptomatic with normal A1C at diabetes onset.

Authors:  Taylor M Triolo; H Peter Chase; Jennifer M Barker
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 17.152

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical and Laboratory Aspects of Insulin Autoantibody-Mediated Glycaemic Dysregulation and Hyperinsulinaemic Hypoglycaemia: Insulin Autoimmune Syndrome and Exogenous Insulin Antibody Syndrome.

Authors:  Tony Huynh
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2020-12

2.  Continuous Glucose Monitoring and HbA1c in Cystic Fibrosis: Clinical Correlations and Implications for CFRD Diagnosis.

Authors:  Kevin J Scully; Jordan S Sherwood; Kimberly Martin; Melanie Ruazol; Peter Marchetti; Mary Larkin; Hui Zheng; Gregory S Sawicki; Ahmet Uluer; Isabel Neuringer; Lael M Yonker; Leonard Sicilian; Deborah J Wexler; Melissa S Putman
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  Consortium-based approach to receiving an EMA qualification opinion on the use of islet autoantibodies as enrichment biomarkers in type 1 diabetes clinical studies.

Authors:  Stephen R Karpen; Jessica L Dunne; Brigitte I Frohnert; Marjana Marinac; Claudia Richard; Sarah E David; Inish M O'Doherty
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 10.460

4.  The Relationship Between Continuous Glucose Monitoring and OGTT in Youth and Young Adults With Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Christine L Chan; Laura Pyle; Tim Vigers; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 6.134

Review 5.  Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in the General Population: A Status Report and Perspective.

Authors:  Emily K Sims; Rachel E J Besser; Colin Dayan; Cristy Geno Rasmussen; Carla Greenbaum; Kurt J Griffin; William Hagopian; Mikael Knip; Anna E Long; Frank Martin; Chantal Mathieu; Marian Rewers; Andrea K Steck; John M Wentworth; Stephen S Rich; Olga Kordonouri; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Kevan C Herold
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 9.337

6.  Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Alana McMichael; Maria Rivera-Santana; Jacob Noel; Tamara Hershey
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-03

7.  Lessons From Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth With Pre-Type 1 Diabetes, Obesity, and Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Christine L Chan; Andrea K Steck; Cameron Severn; Laura Pyle; Marian Rewers; Philip S Zeitler
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 8.  Prediction and Prevention of Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Marina Primavera; Cosimo Giannini; Francesco Chiarelli
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.