CONTEXT: Accurate measures are needed for the prediction and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in at-risk persons. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in predicting T1D onset. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) prospectively follows children at increased risk for development of islet autoantibodies (islet autoantibody positive; Ab+) and T1D. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 23 Ab+ participants with available longitudinal CGM data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CGM metrics as glycemic predictors of progression to T1D. RESULTS: Of 23 Ab+ participants with a baseline CGM, 8 progressed to diabetes at a median age of 13.8 years during a median follow-up of 17.7 years (interquartile range, 14.6 to 22.0 years). Compared with nonprogressors, participants who progressed to diabetes had significantly increased baseline glycemic variability (SD, 29 vs 21 mg/dL; P = 0.047), daytime sensor average (122 vs 106 mg/dL; P = 0.02), and daytime sensor area under the curve (AUC, 470,370 vs 415,465; P = 0.047). They spent 24% of time at >140 mg/dL and 12% at >160 mg/dL compared with, respectively, 8% and 3% for nonprogressors (both P = 0.005). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.85 for percentage of time spent at >140 or 160 mg/dL. The cutoff of 18% time spent at >140 mg/dL had 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a 100% positive predictive value for diabetes prediction, although these values could change because some nonprogressors may develop diabetes with longer follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Eighteen percent or greater CGM time spent at >140 mg/dL predicts progression to diabetes in Ab+ children.
CONTEXT: Accurate measures are needed for the prediction and diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in at-risk persons. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to explore the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in predicting T1D onset. DESIGN AND SETTING: The Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young (DAISY) prospectively follows children at increased risk for development of islet autoantibodies (islet autoantibody positive; Ab+) and T1D. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed 23 Ab+ participants with available longitudinal CGM data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: CGM metrics as glycemic predictors of progression to T1D. RESULTS: Of 23 Ab+ participants with a baseline CGM, 8 progressed to diabetes at a median age of 13.8 years during a median follow-up of 17.7 years (interquartile range, 14.6 to 22.0 years). Compared with nonprogressors, participants who progressed to diabetes had significantly increased baseline glycemic variability (SD, 29 vs 21 mg/dL; P = 0.047), daytime sensor average (122 vs 106 mg/dL; P = 0.02), and daytime sensor area under the curve (AUC, 470,370 vs 415,465; P = 0.047). They spent 24% of time at >140 mg/dL and 12% at >160 mg/dL compared with, respectively, 8% and 3% for nonprogressors (both P = 0.005). A receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis showed an AUC of 0.85 for percentage of time spent at >140 or 160 mg/dL. The cutoff of 18% time spent at >140 mg/dL had 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and a 100% positive predictive value for diabetes prediction, although these values could change because some nonprogressors may develop diabetes with longer follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Eighteen percent or greater CGM time spent at >140 mg/dL predicts progression to diabetes in Ab+ children.
Authors: Jay M Sosenko; Jerry P Palmer; Carla J Greenbaum; Jeffrey Mahon; Catherine Cowie; Jeffrey P Krischer; H Peter Chase; Neil H White; Bruce Buckingham; Kevan C Herold; David Cuthbertson; Jay S Skyler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Lars C Stene; Katherine Barriga; Michelle Hoffman; Jaime Kean; Georgeanna Klingensmith; Jill M Norris; Henry A Erlich; George S Eisenbarth; Marian Rewers Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: David C Klonoff; Bruce Buckingham; Jens S Christiansen; Victor M Montori; William V Tamborlane; Robert A Vigersky; Howard Wolpert Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jay M Sosenko; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jerry P Palmer; Jeffrey Mahon; Catherine Cowie; Carla J Greenbaum; David Cuthbertson; John M Lachin; Jay S Skyler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-11-13 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Satish K Garg; James Smith; Christie Beatson; Benita Lopez-Baca; Mary Voelmle; Peter A Gottlieb Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Jennifer M Barker; Stephanie H Goehrig; Katherine Barriga; Michelle Hoffman; Robert Slover; George S Eisenbarth; Jill M Norris; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Marian Rewers Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Jay M Sosenko; Jay S Skyler; Jeffrey Mahon; Jeffrey P Krischer; Craig A Beam; David C Boulware; Carla J Greenbaum; Lisa E Rafkin; Catherine Cowie; David Cuthbertson; Jerry P Palmer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Kevin J Scully; Jordan S Sherwood; Kimberly Martin; Melanie Ruazol; Peter Marchetti; Mary Larkin; Hui Zheng; Gregory S Sawicki; Ahmet Uluer; Isabel Neuringer; Lael M Yonker; Leonard Sicilian; Deborah J Wexler; Melissa S Putman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Stephen R Karpen; Jessica L Dunne; Brigitte I Frohnert; Marjana Marinac; Claudia Richard; Sarah E David; Inish M O'Doherty Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Christine L Chan; Laura Pyle; Tim Vigers; Philip S Zeitler; Kristen J Nadeau Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2022-01-18 Impact factor: 6.134
Authors: Emily K Sims; Rachel E J Besser; Colin Dayan; Cristy Geno Rasmussen; Carla Greenbaum; Kurt J Griffin; William Hagopian; Mikael Knip; Anna E Long; Frank Martin; Chantal Mathieu; Marian Rewers; Andrea K Steck; John M Wentworth; Stephen S Rich; Olga Kordonouri; Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Kevan C Herold Journal: Diabetes Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 9.337
Authors: Christine L Chan; Andrea K Steck; Cameron Severn; Laura Pyle; Marian Rewers; Philip S Zeitler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-01-14 Impact factor: 19.112