OBJECTIVE: The accurate prediction of type 1 diabetes is essential for appropriately identifying prevention trial participants. Thus, we have developed a risk score for the prediction of type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) participants, islet cell autoantibody (ICA)-positive relatives of type 1 diabetic patients (n = 670), were randomly divided into development and validation samples. Risk score values were calculated for the validation sample from development sample model coefficients obtained through forward stepwise proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A risk score based on a model including log-BMI, age, log-fasting C-peptide, and postchallenge glucose and C-peptide sums from 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) was derived from the development sample. The baseline risk score strongly predicted type 1 diabetes in the validation sample (chi(2) = 82.3, P < 0.001). Its strength of prediction was almost the same (chi(2) = 83.3) as a risk score additionally dependent on a decreased first-phase insulin response variable from intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs). Biochemical autoantibodies did not contribute significantly to the risk score model. A final type 1 diabetes risk score was then derived from all participants with the same variables as those in the development sample model. The change in the type 1 diabetes risk score from baseline to 1 year was in itself also highly predictive of type 1 diabetes (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A risk score based on age, BMI, and OGTT indexes, without dependence on IVGTTs or additional autoantibodies, appears to accurately predict type 1 diabetes in ICA-positive relatives.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: The accurate prediction of type 1 diabetes is essential for appropriately identifying prevention trial participants. Thus, we have developed a risk score for the prediction of type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Diabetes Prevention Trial-Type 1 (DPT-1) participants, islet cell autoantibody (ICA)-positive relatives of type 1 diabeticpatients (n = 670), were randomly divided into development and validation samples. Risk score values were calculated for the validation sample from development sample model coefficients obtained through forward stepwise proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A risk score based on a model including log-BMI, age, log-fasting C-peptide, and postchallenge glucose and C-peptide sums from 2-h oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) was derived from the development sample. The baseline risk score strongly predicted type 1 diabetes in the validation sample (chi(2) = 82.3, P < 0.001). Its strength of prediction was almost the same (chi(2) = 83.3) as a risk score additionally dependent on a decreased first-phase insulin response variable from intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs). Biochemical autoantibodies did not contribute significantly to the risk score model. A final type 1 diabetes risk score was then derived from all participants with the same variables as those in the development sample model. The change in the type 1 diabetes risk score from baseline to 1 year was in itself also highly predictive of type 1 diabetes (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A risk score based on age, BMI, and OGTT indexes, without dependence on IVGTTs or additional autoantibodies, appears to accurately predict type 1 diabetes in ICA-positive relatives.
Authors: Wei Hao; Carla J Greenbaum; Jeffrey P Krischer; David Cuthbertson; Jennifer B Marks; Jerry P Palmer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Ping Xu; Yougui Wu; Yiliang Zhu; Getachew Dagne; Giffe Johnson; David Cuthbertson; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jay M Sosenko; Jay S Skyler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-08-31 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Oindrila Raha; Subhankar Chowdhury; Samir Dasgupta; P Raychaudhuri; B N Sarkar; P Veer Raju; V R Rao Journal: Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries Date: 2009-04