Literature DB >> 1938628

Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats.

P A Leake1, G T Hradek, S J Rebscher, R L Snyder.   

Abstract

Ten newborn kittens were deafened by systemic administration of neomycin sulfate. Profound hearing losses were documented by ABR and FFR (500 Hz) testing. At 9-17 weeks of age, the young deafened cats were unilaterally implanted with a multichannel scala tympani electrode. Six of the animals were chronically stimulated at 6 dB above electrically evoked ABR thresholds for 1 h/day for periods of 1 month or 3 months. Stimuli were charge-balanced biphasic pulses (200 microseconds/phase, 30 pps.) The remaining 4 cats underwent identical deafening and implantation schedules but were not stimulated. Results indicate that administration of neomycin in neonatal cats induced degeneration of hair cells and spiral ganglion cell loss that was bilaterally symmetrical between the two cochleas of each individual animal, although there was variation between animals in the severity of the ototoxic drug effect. In animals receiving passive (unstimulated) implants, morphometric analysis of spiral ganglion cell density showed no significant difference in ganglion cell survival between the implanted cochleas and the contralateral control ears. In contrast, animals that were chronically stimulated for 3 months showed significantly better neuronal survival in implanted and stimulated cochleas as compared to contralateral deafened control ears. The induced conservation of spiral ganglion neurons was observed consistently within the basal cochlear region near the stimulating electrodes. In more apical regions there was no significant difference between the stimulated and control cochleas. The mechanisms underlying this selective conservation of spiral ganglion neurons induced by chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation are uncertain. Since no comparable chronic stimulation studies have been conducted in adults, it is not known whether similar conservation effects could be induced in mature animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1938628     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90120-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  47 in total

1.  The effect of cochlear-implant-mediated electrical stimulation on spiral ganglion cells in congenitally deaf white cats.

Authors:  Iris Chen; Charles J Limb; David K Ryugo
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-09-04

2.  Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation.

Authors:  Russell L Snyder; Julie A Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-12

3.  Membrane depolarization inhibits spiral ganglion neurite growth via activation of multiple types of voltage sensitive calcium channels and calpain.

Authors:  Pamela C Roehm; Ningyong Xu; Erika A Woodson; Steven H Green; Marlan R Hansen
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 4.314

4.  CaMKII and CaMKIV mediate distinct prosurvival signaling pathways in response to depolarization in neurons.

Authors:  Jinwoong Bok; Qiong Wang; Jie Huang; Steven H Green
Journal:  Mol Cell Neurosci       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 4.314

5.  Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats.

Authors:  Maike Vollmer; Ralph E Beitel; Russell L Snyder; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-09-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural ITD Sensitivity and Temporal Coding with Cochlear Implants in an Animal Model of Early-Onset Deafness.

Authors:  Yoojin Chung; Brian D Buechel; Woongsang Sunwoo; Joseph D Wagner; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-01-08

7.  Trophic support of cultured spiral ganglion neurons by depolarization exceeds and is additive with that by neurotrophins or cAMP and requires elevation of [Ca2+]i within a set range.

Authors:  J L Hegarty; A R Kay; S H Green
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Stem cell transplantation for auditory nerve replacement.

Authors:  Richard A Altschuler; K Sue O'Shea; Josef M Miller
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Combining cell-based therapies and neural prostheses to promote neural survival.

Authors:  Andrew K Wise; James B Fallon; Alison J Neil; Lisa N Pettingill; Marilyn S Geaney; Stephen J Skinner; Robert K Shepherd
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.620

10.  Polypyrrole-coated electrodes for the delivery of charge and neurotrophins to cochlear neurons.

Authors:  Rachael T Richardson; Andrew K Wise; Brianna C Thompson; Brianna O Flynn; Patrick J Atkinson; Nicole J Fretwell; James B Fallon; Gordon G Wallace; Rob K Shepherd; Graeme M Clark; Stephen J O'Leary
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.