Literature DB >> 30840722

Validation of automatic cochlear implant electrode localization techniques using μ CTs.

Yiyuan Zhao1, Robert F Labadie2, Benoit M Dawant1, Jack H Noble1,2.   

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) are standard treatment for patients who experience sensorineural hearing loss. Although these devices have been remarkably successful at restoring hearing, it is rare that they permit to achieve natural fidelity and many patients experience poor outcomes. Our group has developed image-guided CI programming techniques (IGCIP), in which image analysis techniques are used to locate the intracochlear position of CI electrodes to determine patient-customized settings for the CI processor. Clinical studies have shown that IGCIP leads to significantly improved outcomes. A crucial step is the localization of the electrodes, and rigorously quantifying the accuracy of our algorithms requires dedicated datasets. We discuss the creation of a ground truth dataset for electrode position and its use to evaluate the accuracy of our electrode localization techniques. Our final ground truth dataset includes 30 temporal bone specimens that were each implanted with one of four different types of electrode array by an experienced CI surgeon. The arrays were localized in conventional CT images using our automatic methods and manually in high-resolution μ CT images to create the ground truth. The conventional and μ CT images were registered to facilitate comparison between automatic and ground truth electrode localization results. Our technique resulted in mean errors of 0.13 mm in localizing the electrodes across 30 cases. Our approach successfully permitted characterizing the accuracy of our methods, which is critical to understand their limitations for use in IGCIP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cochlear implant; electrode localization; image-guided cochlear implant programming; validation

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840722      PMCID: PMC6152538          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.3.035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  21 in total

1.  Electrical field interactions in different cochlear implant systems.

Authors:  Colette Boëx; Chloé de Balthasar; Maria-Izabel Kós; Marco Pelizzone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

3.  Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Berit M Verbist; Johan H M Frijns; Jakob Geleijns; Mark A van Buchem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Flux driven automatic centerline extraction.

Authors:  Sylvain Bouix; Kaleem Siddiqi; Allen Tannenbaum
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

6.  Assessment of electrode placement and audiological outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Theodore R McRackan; Benoit M Dawant; Mary S Dietrich; Linsey D Watkins; Alejandro Rivas; Theodore A Schuman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Automatic segmentation of intracochlear anatomy in conventional CT.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; Omid Majdani; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography.

Authors:  Antje Aschendorff; Ralf Kubalek; Bernd Turowski; Friedhelm Zanella; Albrecht Hochmuth; Martin Schumacher; Thomas Klenzner; Roland Laszig
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Image-guidance enables new methods for customizing cochlear implant stimulation strategies.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford; Benoit M Dawant
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Margaret W Skinner; Timothy A Holden; Bruce R Whiting; Arne H Voie; Barry Brunsden; J Gail Neely; Eugene A Saxon; Timothy E Hullar; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  2007-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Quality-assured training in the evaluation of cochlear implant electrode position: a prospective experimental study.

Authors:  Alexander Mewes; Sebastian Burg; Goetz Brademann; Jan Andreas Dambon; Matthias Hey
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.263

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.