Literature DB >> 30840416

Who Knows What, and When?: A Survey of the Privacy Policies Proffered by U.S. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies.

Christopher Slobogin1, James W Hazel2.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing (DTC-GT) companies have proliferated in the past several years. Based on an analysis of genetic material submitted by consumers, these companies offer a wide array of services, ranging from providing information about health and ancestry to identification of surreptitiously-gathered biological material sent in by suspicious spouses. Federal and state laws are ambiguous about the types of disclosures these companies must make about how the genetic information they obtain is collected, used, and shared. In an effort to assist in developing such laws, this Article reports a survey of the privacy policies these companies purport to follow. It canvasses ninety DTC-GT companies operating in the United States and provides a detailed analysis of whether and to what extent those policies inform consumers about how their genetic information will be used and secured, with whom it will be shared, and a host of other issues. Using the Federal Trade Commission’s articulation of the Fair Information Practice Principles and the agency’s proposed Privacy Framework as the baseline, we conclude that most policies fall well short of the ideal.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30840416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornell J Law Public Policy        ISSN: 1069-0565


  16 in total

1.  Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools: A Mixed-Methods Study of Consumer Motivation and Behavior.

Authors:  Sarah C Nelson; Deborah J Bowen; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Pilar N Ossorio; Susan A Berry; Henry T Greely; Amy L McGuire; Michelle A Penny; Sharon F Terry
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.

Authors:  Henry T Greely
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.718

4.  Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Grayson L Ruhl; James W Hazel; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

Review 5.  Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Authors:  Alexandra Cernat; Naazish S Bashir; Wendy J Ungar
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 6.  Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services.

Authors:  Christi J Guerrini; Jennifer K Wagner; Sarah C Nelson; Gail H Javitt; Amy L McGuire
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.

Authors:  Anna Docherty; Brent Kious; Teneille Brown; Leslie Francis; Louisa Stark; Brooks Keeshin; Jeffrey Botkin; Emily DiBlasi; Doug Gray; Hilary Coon
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  WHY WE FEAR GENETIC INFORMANTS: USING GENETIC GENEALOGY TO CATCH SERIAL KILLERS.

Authors:  Teneille R Brown
Journal:  Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev       Date:  2019

Review 9.  Legal Challenges in Genetics, Including Duty to Warn and Genetic Discrimination.

Authors:  Sonia Suter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 6.915

10.  Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.

Authors:  Zhijun Yin; Lijun Song; Ellen W Clayton; Bradley A Malin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.