| Literature DB >> 30839735 |
Huan Wu1,2, Yang Chen1,3,4, Zegeng Li1,2,3, Xianhua Liu1.
Abstract
In this work, an untargeted metabolomic method based on ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-QTOF/MS) in MSE (E represents collision energy) mode was exploited to determine the dynamic metabolic alterations in the plasma of male C57BL/6 mice during the onset and development of lung carcinoma. Plasma samples were collected from control and model mice (male C57BL/6 mice experimentally inoculated with the Lewis lung carcinoma cells) at 7 and 14 days post-inoculation (DPI). As a result, 15 dysregulated metabolites, including cholesterol sulphate, tiglylcarnitine, 1-palmitoylglycerophosphoinositol, 2-stearoylglycerophosphoinositol, stearoylcarnitine, PC(20:2(11Z,14Z)/16:0), PC(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)/14:0), PC(22:5(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)/14:0), PC(22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)/16:0), 12,20-Dioxo-leukotriene B4, sphingosine 1-phosphate(d19:1-P), sphingomyelin(d18:0/16:1(9Z)), lysoPC(16:0), lysoPC(18:0) and lysoPC(20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)), were identified in the plasma of model mice with xenografts at both 7 and 14 DPI. All the altered metabolites associated with the onset and development of lung carcinoma were involved in the metabolism of glycerophospholipid, fatty acid, sphingolipid and arachidonic acid. The feasible utility of these endogenous biomarkers as potential diagnostic indicators was validated through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Collectively, these findings provide a systematic view of metabolic changes linked to the onset and development of lung carcinoma.Entities:
Keywords: UPLC-QTOF-MS; lung carcinoma; multivariate data analysis; receiver operating characteristic curve; untargeted metabolomics
Year: 2018 PMID: 30839735 PMCID: PMC6170569 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.The sarcoma weights (a) and volumes (b) of the control, 7 DPI and 14 DPI group.
Figure 2.PCA score plot and Hotelling's T plot of all analysed samples in the 7 DPI model group, 14 DPI model group, control group and QCP samples. PCA score plot of all analysed samples in positive ion mode (a) with the statistical parameters (R2X = 94%, Q2 = 86%) and negative ion mode (c) with the statistical parameters (R2X = 97%, Q2 = 83%). The corresponding Hotelling's T plot in positive ion mode (b) and negative ion mode (d).
Figure 3.Score plot, corresponding S-plot and loading-plot from the OPLS-DA model between the 7 DPI group and control group. Score plot (a) generated from the OPLS-DA model between the 7 DPI and control group in positive ion mode (R2Y = 79%, Q2 = 58%), and corresponding S-plot (b) and loading-plot (c) from the OPLS-DA model. Score plot (d) generated from the OPLS-DA model between the 7 DPI and control group in negative ion mode (R2Y = 95%, Q2 = 87%), and corresponding S-plot (e) and loading-plot (f) from the OPLS-DA model.
Figure 4.Heat maps of the significantly differential metabolites. Hierarchical clustering was used to separate individual samples (X-axis). Y-axis represents compounds. Metabolomic profile between different groups was shown a clear separation in the heat map. Normalized signal intensities are visualized as a colour spectrum in the heat maps. Red represents high expression, and green represents low expression of the dysregulated metabolites. Heat maps showcasing the significantly differential metabolites screened from the control group and 7 DPI group in positive (a) and negative (c) ion mode. Heat maps showcasing the significantly differential metabolites screened from the 14 DPI and 7 DPI group in positive (b) and negative (d) ion mode. Yellow colour represents control samples, cyan colour indicates 7 DPI samples and rose red colour indicates 14 DPI samples.
Nine dysregulated metabolites under positive ion mode and 7 dysregulated metabolites under negative ion mode were detected throughout the onset and development of lung carcinoma. PC, phosphocholine; LysoPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; SM, sphingomyelin; FC, fold change.
| features ( | adduct | formula | compound | AUCa | log2(FC)a | metabolic pathway | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.39_496.3481 | [M + H]+ | C24H50NO7P | lysoPC(16:0) | 2.26 × 10−6 | 0.99 | −0.91 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 13.95_524.3726 | [M + H]+ | C26H54NO7P | lysoPC(18:0) | 5.40 × 10−6 | 0.94 | −0.83 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 23.58_703.5757 | [M + H]+ | C39H79N2O6P | SM(d18:0/16:1(9Z)) | 7.03 × 10−4 | 0.90 | −0.53 | sphingolipid metabolism |
| 24.76_786.6020 | [M + H]+ | C44H84NO8P | PC(20:2(11Z,14Z)/16:0) | 8.60 × 10−5 | 0.90 | 0.46 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 22.46_760.5924 | [M + 2Na + H]+ | C46H80NO8P | PC(22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)/16:0) | 2.66 × 10−4 | 0.84 | 1.13 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 23.98_782.5676 | [M + H]+ | C44H80NO8P | PC(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)/14:0) | 4.79 × 10−5 | 0.96 | 1.03 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 22.77_760.4027 | [2M + ACN + Na]+ | C20H28O5 | 12,20-dioxo-leukotriene B4 | 6.16 × 10−3 | 0.84 | −0.29 | arachidonic acid metabolism |
| 27.18_832.5924 | [2M + ACN + H]+ | C19H42NO5P | sphingosine 1-phosphate (d19:1-P) | 2.02 × 10−2 | 0.80 | −0.76 | sphingolipid metabolism |
| 25.63_780.5592 | [M + H]+ | C44H78NO8P | PC(22:5(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)/14:0) | 7.32 × 10−6 | 0.99 | 1.95 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 24.52_465.3056 | [M − H]− | C27H46O4S | cholesterol sulphate | 5.46 × 10−6 | 1.00 | 1.58 | fatty acid metabolism |
| 14.46_485.2835 | [2M − H]− | C12H21NO4 | tiglylcarnitine | 6.57 × 10−6 | 0.93 | −0.49 | fatty acid metabolism |
| 10.46_1131.6713 | [2M + FA − H]− | C28H50NO7P | lysoPC(20:4(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z)) | 0.035437 | 0.78 | −0.43 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 13.91_568.3634 | [M + FA − H]− | C26H54NO7P | lysoPC(18:0) | 1.25 × 10−6 | 1.00 | −2.33 | glycerophospholipid metabolism |
| 12.97_599.3215 | [M − H]− | C27H53O12P | 2-stearoylglycerophosphoinositol | 6.08 × 10−4 | 1.00 | −1.55 | fatty acid metabolism |
| 14.60_464.3167 | [M + K − 2H]− | C25H49NO4 | stearoylcarnitine | 2.14 × 10−4 | 0.95 | −0.80 | fatty acid metabolism |
| 10.79_571.2867 | [M − H]− | C25H49O12P | 1-palmitoylglycerophosphoinositol | 6.26 × 10−4 | 1.00 | −1.47 | fatty acid metabolism |
aIndicates the comparisons between 7 DPI and control group.
Figure 5.Pathway analysis of 15 dysregulated metabolites linked to the onset and development of Lewis lung carcinoma. The majority of these 15 dysregulated metabolites were involved in glycerophospholipid metabolism, sphingolipid metabolism and arachidonic acid metabolism.
Figure 6.Comparison of dysregulated metabolites based on ROC analysis in positive ion mode and negative ion mode. The ROC curves were produced by Monte-Carlo cross validation based on balanced sub-sampling. Multivariate algorithm—support vector machines (SVM) was selected as classification and feature sorting method. (a) Biomarkers detected in positive ion mode. (b) Biomarkers detected in negative ion mode. Var. (variables) represents the number of selected features.