| Literature DB >> 35028346 |
Mei-Ning Zhu1, Cui-Zhu Zhao1, Chong-Zhi Wang2,3, Jian-Bo Rao1, Yong-Wei Qiu1, Yan-Ping Gao1, Xiao-Yun Wang1, Ya-Mei Zhang1, Guang Wu1, Jie Chen1, Qin-Ge Ma1,2,3, Guo-Yue Zhong1, Rong-Rui Wei1.
Abstract
Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is a serious problem endangering human health in the world. The pathogenesis of this disease is often accompanied by lipid metabolism disorder and can cause liver lipid accumulation. Highland barley Monascus purpureus Went extract (HBMPWE) can inhibit the liver lipid accumulation caused by a high-fat, high-fructose, high-cholesterol diet. However, it is not clear what changes have taken place in the process of liver lipid metabolism after HBMPWE administration. To fill this knowledge gap and to support the findings published in the companion research article entitled "Highland Barley Monascus purpureus Went Extract Ameliorates High-Fat, High-Fructose, High-Cholesterol Diet Induced Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease by Regulating Lipid Metabolism in Golden Hamsters" [1], we provided important information related to the liver differential metabolites and identified twenty-one differential metabolites of liver metabolism. In the model group, the levels of lactate, linoleic acid, and malic acid increased significantly. After HBMPWE treatment, the expressions of these metabolites reduced significantly. Therefore, these liver differential metabolites could be used as biological signatures reflecting the severity of NAFLD and HBMPWE treatment outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: High-cholesterol diet; High-fat; High-fructose; Highland barley Monascus purpureus went; Metabolites; Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Year: 2021 PMID: 35028346 PMCID: PMC8741472 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1OPLS-DA score plots in different groups under positive and negative-ion modes. (A) OPLS-DA score plots between normal and model in positive-ion mode. (B) OPLS-DA score plots between model and HBMPWE-high in positive-ion mode. (C) OPLS-DA score plots between normal and HBMPWE-high in positive-ion mode. (D) OPLS-DA score plots between normal and model in negative -ion mode. (E) OPLS-DA score plots between model and HBMPWE-high in negative -ion mode. (F) OPLS-DA score plots between normal and HBMPWE-high in negative -ion mode.
Fig. 2OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite in different groups under positive and negative-ion modes. (A) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between normal and model in positive-ion mode. (B) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between model and HBMPWE-high in positive-ion mode. (C) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between normal and HBMPWE-high in positive-ion mode. (D) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between normal and model in negative-ion mode. (E) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between model and HBMPWE-high in negative-ion mode. (F) OPLS-DA replacement test of liver metabolite between normal and HBMPWE-high in negative-ion mode.
OPLS-DA model parameter.
| Positive-ion mode | Negative-ion mode | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | R2Y | Q2 | R2Y | Q2 |
| Model vs Normal | 0.995 | 0.844 | 0.995 | 0.887 |
| HBMPWE-high vs Model | 0.999 | 0.841 | 0.959 | 0.669 |
| HBMPWE-high vs Normal | 0.995 | 0.900 | 0.990 | 0.885 |
Fig. 3Venn diagram of metabolic set. (A) The number of down-regulated metabolites in the model group, compared with the normal group; (B) The number of up-regulated metabolites in the HBMPWE-high group, compared with the model group; (C) The number of up-regulated metabolites in the model group, compared with the normal group; (D) The number of down-regulated metabolites in the HBMPWE-high group, compared with the model group.
Common differential metabolites in each group.
| Mode | Metabolite | M/Z | Adducts | Formula | RT/min | Model vs Normal | TMPWE-high vs Model | HMDB ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pos | Glucosylceramide (d18:1/16:0) | 722.5552 | M+H-H2O, M+H, M+Na | C40H77NO8 | 10.62 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0004971 |
| Pos | PE(16:1(9Z)/20:1(11Z)) | 744.5550 | M+H, M+2Na-H, M+Na | C41H78NO8P | 10.99 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0008966 |
| Pos | PE(16:1(9Z)/20:2(11Z,14Z)) | 742.5393 | M+H, M+Na, M+2Na-H | C41H76NO8P | 10.55 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0008967 |
| Pos | PE(P-18:0/20:4(6E,8Z,11Z,14Z)(5OH[S])) | 768.5550 | M+H, M+Na | C43H78NO8P | 10.85 | ↑ | ↓ | LMGP20020013 |
| Pos | PC(18:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)) | 786.6019 | M+H, M+Na | C44H84NO8P | 10.81 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0008039 |
| Pos | PE(20:3(8Z,11Z,14Z)/0:0) | 504.3093 | M+H-H2O, M+H | C25H46NO7P | 8.06 | ↑ | ↓ | LMGP02050022 |
| Pos | DG(18:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)/0:0) | 603.5356 | M+H-H2O | C39H72O5 | 10.99 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0007161 |
| Pos | C16 Sphingosine | 272.2586 | M+H | C16H33NO2 | 7.84 | ↑ | ↓ | LMSP01040008 |
| Pos | S-(2-carboxypropyl)-Cysteamine | 164.0741 | M+H | C6H13NO2S | 0.99 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0002169 |
| Pos | Tetrahydrodipicolinate | 154.0499 | M+H-H2O | C7H9NO4 | 0.86 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0012289 |
| Neg | Glycerol 3-phosphate | 171.0057 | M-H, M+K-2H, M-H2O-H | C3H9O6P | 0.58 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0000126 |
| Neg | LysoPC(20:2(11Z,14Z)) | 592.3636 | M+Cl, M+FA-H | C28H54NO7P | 8.37 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0010392 |
| Neg | LysoPE(20:3(11Z,14Z,17Z)/0:0) | 502.2951 | M-H | C25H46NO7P | 8.05 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0011514 |
| Neg | LysoPE(20:1(11Z)/0:0) | 506.3261 | M-H | C25H50NO7P | 8.94 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0011512 |
| Neg | LysoPE(20:2(11Z,14Z)/0:0) | 504.3111 | M-H | C25H48NO7P | 8.47 | ↑ | ↓ | HMDB0011513 |
| Pos | 1-Palmitoylglycerophosphoinositol | 555.2939 | M+H-2H2O, M+2Na-H, M+Na, M+H-H2O | C25H49O12P | 8.11 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0061695 |
| Pos | PE-NMe2(16:0/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 814.5369 | M+H, M+Na | C45H78NO8P | 10.07 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0113959 |
| Pos | 13-Tetradecene-1,3-diyne-6,7-diol | 482.3251 | 2M+ACN+H | C14H20O2 | 7.63 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0039539 |
| Neg | LysoPC(22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 612.3322 | M+Cl, M+FA-H | C30H50NO7P | 7.54 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0010404 |
| Neg | LysoPC(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)) | 616.3631 | M+FA-H | C30H54NO7P | 8.19 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0010401 |
| Neg | LysoPE(0:0/22:5(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z,19Z)) | 572.3005 | M+FA-H | C27H46NO7P | 8.24 | ↓ | ↑ | HMDB0011495 |
P < 0.05
P < 0.01
P < 0.001, vs the normal group.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.001, vs the model group.
| Subject | Health and Medical Sciences |
| Specific subject area | Liver, metabolic diseases, NAFLD,biological signature |
| Type of data | Figures and Tables |
| How data was acquired | Q Exactive UPLC-MS/MS |
| Data format | Raw, Analysed |
| Description of data collection | Metabolomic liver profiles of golden hamsters, NAFLD golden hamsters and HBMPWE-treated NAFLD golden hamsters were investigated. Metabolomic liver profiling from NAFLD model group and HBMPWE-treated group. |
| Data source location | Data were collected at Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China |
| Data accessibility | Data is provided within this article |