Elizabeth M Vaughan1, Aanand D Naik1,2, Courtney M Lewis3, John P Foreyt1, Susan L Samson1, David J Hyman1. 1. Department of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 2. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety (IQuESt), Michael E DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas. 3. School of Health Professions Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are a well-established source to improve patient health care, yet their training and support remain suboptimal. This limits program expansion and potentially compromises patient safety. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of weekly training and support by telemedicine (videoconferencing). Materials and Methods: CHWs (n = 6) who led diabetes group visits for low-income Latinos met weekly with a health care professional for training and support. Feasibility and acceptability outcome measures included telemedicine usability, knowledge of diabetes (baseline to 6 months), and program satisfaction. Results: Telemedicine training and support were found to be feasible and acceptable as measured by usability (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire: average 4.7/5.0, ±0.4), knowledge (Diabetes Knowledge Test: pretest 15.8 ± 1.3, posttest 21.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.001, respectively), and satisfaction (Texas Department of State Health Services survey: average 5.8/6.0, ±0.5). All CHWs preferred telemedicine to in-person training. Conclusions: Telemedicine is a feasible and acceptable modality to train and support CHWs.
Background: Community health workers (CHWs) are a well-established source to improve patient health care, yet their training and support remain suboptimal. This limits program expansion and potentially compromises patient safety. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of weekly training and support by telemedicine (videoconferencing). Materials and Methods: CHWs (n = 6) who led diabetes group visits for low-income Latinos met weekly with a health care professional for training and support. Feasibility and acceptability outcome measures included telemedicine usability, knowledge of diabetes (baseline to 6 months), and program satisfaction. Results: Telemedicine training and support were found to be feasible and acceptable as measured by usability (Telehealth Usability Questionnaire: average 4.7/5.0, ±0.4), knowledge (Diabetes Knowledge Test: pretest 15.8 ± 1.3, posttest 21.8 ± 1.2, p < 0.001, respectively), and satisfaction (Texas Department of State Health Services survey: average 5.8/6.0, ±0.5). All CHWs preferred telemedicine to in-person training. Conclusions: Telemedicine is a feasible and acceptable modality to train and support CHWs.
Entities:
Keywords:
community health worker; diabetes; education; low income; telemedicine; training
Authors: S L Norris; F M Chowdhury; K Van Le; T Horsley; J N Brownstein; X Zhang; L Jack; D W Satterfield Journal: Diabet Med Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.359
Authors: Linnaea Schuttner; Ntazana Sindano; Mathew Theis; Cory Zue; Jessica Joseph; Roma Chilengi; Benjamin H Chi; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Namwinga Chintu Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-06-13 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Elizabeth M Vaughan; Craig A Johnston; Victor J Cardenas; Jennette P Moreno; John P Foreyt Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2017-10-19 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: B E McGuire; T G Morrison; N Hermanns; S Skovlund; E Eldrup; J Gagliardino; A Kokoszka; D Matthews; M Pibernik-Okanović; J Rodríguez-Saldaña; M de Wit; F J Snoek Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-10-20 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: James T Fitzgerald; Martha M Funnell; Robert M Anderson; Robin Nwankwo; R Brent Stansfield; Grecthen A Piatt Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Rifat Latifi; Jayleen K L Gunn; Evis Bakiu; Arian Boci; Erion Dasho; Fatos Olldashi; Pellumb Pipero; John A Stroster; Orland Qesteri; Julian Kucani; Ardi Sulo; Manjola Oshafi; Kalterina L Osmani; Agron Dogjani; Charles R Doarn; Zhaneta Shatri; Agim Kociraj; Ronald C Merrell Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Rachel S Purvis; Ramey A Moore; Britni L Ayers; Holly C Felix; Sheldon Riklon; Jennifer A Andersen; Jonell S Hudson; Gail O'Connor; Meetu Kelen; Lee-Ann Noelani Heely-Rolston; Xochitl Shields; Pearl A McElfish Journal: Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care Date: 2022-01-13
Authors: Elizabeth M Vaughan; David J Hyman; Aanand D Naik; Susan L Samson; Javad Razjouyan; John P Foreyt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sabuj Kanti Mistry; Ben Harris-Roxas; Uday Narayan Yadav; Sadia Shabnam; Lal Bahadur Rawal; Mark F Harris Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-06-22