Literature DB >> 33531013

The most used questionnaires for evaluating telemedicine services.

Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari1, Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Questionnaires are commonly used tools in telemedicine services that can help to evaluate different aspects. Selecting the ideal questionnaire for this purpose may be challenging for researchers. This study aims to review which questionnaires are used to evaluate telemedicine services in the studies, which are most common, and what aspects of telemedicine evaluation do they capture.
METHODS: The PubMed database was searched in August 2020 to retrieve articles. Data extracted from the final list of articles included author/year of publication, journal of publication, type of evaluation, and evaluation questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: Fifty-three articles were included in this study. The questionnaire was used for evaluating the satisfaction (49%), usability (34%), acceptance (11.5%), and implementation (2%) of telemedicine services. Among telemedicine specific questionnaires, Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ) (19%), Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ) (13%), and Service User Technology Acceptability Questionnaire (SUTAQ) (5.5%), were respectively most frequently used in the collected articles. Other most used questionnaires generally used for evaluating the users' satisfaction, usability, and acceptance of technology were Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) (5.5%), Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (QUIS) (5.5%), System Usability Scale (SUS) (5.5%), Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ) (5.5%), and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (3.5%) respectively.
CONCLUSION: Employing specifically designed questionnaires or designing a new questionnaire with fewer questions and more comprehensiveness in terms of the issues studied provides a better evaluation. Attention to user needs, end-user acceptance, and implementation processes, along with users' satisfaction and usability evaluation, may optimize telemedicine efforts in the future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Evaluation; Questionnaire; Telemedicine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33531013      PMCID: PMC7852181          DOI: 10.1186/s12911-021-01407-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak        ISSN: 1472-6947            Impact factor:   2.796


  70 in total

1.  Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck.

Authors:  Elske Ammenwerth; Jytte Brender; Pirkko Nykänen; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch; Michael Rigby; Jan Talmon
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2004-06-30       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakken; Lorena Grullon-Figueroa; Roberto Izquierdo; Nam-Ju Lee; Philip Morin; Walter Palmas; Jeanne Teresi; Ruth S Weinstock; Steven Shea; Justin Starren
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Development of a Customizable Health IT Usability Evaluation Scale.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Dean Wantland; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2010-11-13

Review 4.  A systematic review of the methodologies used to evaluate telemedicine service initiatives in hospital facilities.

Authors:  Sharifah AlDossary; Melinda G Martin-Khan; Natalie K Bradford; Anthony C Smith
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  Real-time teleophthalmology video consultation: an analysis of patient satisfaction in rural Western Australia.

Authors:  Benjamin Kj Host; Angus W Turner; Josephine Muir
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-04-23       Impact factor: 2.742

6.  Remote Ambulatory Management of Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Barry G Fields; Pratima Pathak Behari; Susan McCloskey; Gala True; Diane Richardson; Arwin Thomasson; Danijela Korom-Djakovic; Keith Davies; Samuel T Kuna
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.849

7.  Feasibility of Diabetes Self-Management Telehealth Education for Older Adults During Transitions in Care.

Authors:  Christina R Whitehouse; Judith A Long; Lori McLeer Maloney; Kimberly Daniels; David A Horowitz; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 1.571

8.  Videoconferences and Treatment of Depression: Satisfaction Score Correlated with Number of Sessions Attended but Not with Age.

Authors:  Lone Fisker Christensen; Frederik Alkier Gildberg; Christian Sibbersen; Mette Maria Skjoeth; Connie Thuroe Nielsen; Jens Peter Hansen
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.536

9.  Evaluation of a Blended Physical Activity Intervention for Older Adults: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Sumit Mehra; Jantine van den Helder; Bart Visser; Raoul H H Engelbert; Peter J M Weijs; Ben J A Kröse
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Design and Usability Evaluation of Social Mobile Diabetes Management System in the Gulf Region.

Authors:  Turki Alanzi; Robert Istepanian; Nada Philip
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-09-26
View more
  14 in total

1.  Disparities in Telehealth Care in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Ruth Ann Marrie; Leanne Kosowan; Gary Cutter; Robert Fox; Amber Salter
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2022-06

2.  Provider and Patient Satisfaction with Telemedicine Voice Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Mary E Kim; Lauren Timmons Sund; Mariah Morton; James Kim; Janet S Choi; M Eugenia Castro
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  How to identify the most suitable questionnaires and rating scales for your clinical practice or research?

Authors:  Yara Shoman; Nicole Majery; Marina Otelea; Charlotte Lambreghts; Irina Guseva Canu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-10-03       Impact factor: 3.149

4.  Evaluation of Physicians' Electronic Health Records Experience Using Actual and Perceived Measures.

Authors:  Saif Khairat; Cameron Coleman; Paige Ottmar; Thomas Bice; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

5.  Translation and Validation of the Questionnaire on Acceptance to Telemedicine from the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for Use in Malaysia.

Authors:  Masliyana Husin; Norazida Ab Rahman; Mohamad Adam Bujang; Sock Wen Ng; Kawselyah Juval; Wen Yea Hwong; Sheamini Sivasampu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 6.  The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health.

Authors:  Sadrieh Hajesmaeel-Gohari; Firoozeh Khordastan; Farhad Fatehi; Hamidreza Samzadeh; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 7.  Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications.

Authors:  Abid Haleem; Mohd Javaid; Ravi Pratap Singh; Rajiv Suman
Journal:  Sens Int       Date:  2021-07-24

8.  The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire (TSUQ) and Telemedicine Patient Questionnaire (TPQ) in individuals with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mehmet Özkeskin; Fatih Özden; Özgül Ekmekçi; Nur Yüceyar
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 9.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andreas Knapp; Lorenz Harst; Stefan Hager; Jochen Schmitt; Madlen Scheibe
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Evaluating factors of greater patient satisfaction with outpatient cardiology telehealth visits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  David Cho; Suzan Khalil; Megan Kamath; Holly Wilhalme; Angelica Lewis; Melissa Moore; Ali Nsair
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2021-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.