Literature DB >> 30838510

A deep learning framework for efficient analysis of breast volume and fibroglandular tissue using MR data with strong artifacts.

Tatyana Ivanovska1, Thomas G Jentschke2, Amro Daboul3, Katrin Hegenscheid4, Henry Völzke5, Florentin Wörgötter2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main purpose of this work is to develop, apply, and evaluate an efficient approach for breast density estimation in magnetic resonance imaging data, which contain strong artifacts including intensity inhomogeneities.
METHODS: We present a pipeline for breast density estimation, which consists of intensity inhomogeneity correction, breast volume segmentation, nipple extraction, and fibroglandular tissue segmentation. For the segmentation steps, a well-known deep learning architecture is employed.
RESULTS: The average Dice coefficient for the breast parenchyma is [Formula: see text], which outperforms the classical state-of-the-art approach by a margin of [Formula: see text].
CONCLUSION: The proposed solution is accurate and highly efficient and has potential to be applied for big epidemiological data with thousands of participants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast density; Deep learning; MRI; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30838510     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01928-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  17 in total

Review 1.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: MR artifacts, safety, and quality control.

Authors:  Jiachen Zhuo; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 2.  A review of methods for correction of intensity inhomogeneity in MRI.

Authors:  Uros Vovk; Franjo Pernus; Bostjan Likar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  BI-RADS classification for management of abnormal mammograms.

Authors:  Margaret M Eberl; Chester H Fox; Stephen B Edge; Cathleen A Carter; Martin C Mahoney
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

4.  Breast segmentation and density estimation in breast MRI: a fully automatic framework.

Authors:  Albert Gubern-Mérida; Michiel Kallenberg; Ritse M Mann; Robert Martí; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.772

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

8.  Study of Health In Pomerania (SHIP): a health examination survey in an east German region: objectives and design.

Authors:  U John; B Greiner; E Hensel; J Lüdemann; M Piek; S Sauer; C Adam; G Born; D Alte; E Greiser; U Haertel; H W Hense; J Haerting; S Willich; C Kessler
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  2001

Review 9.  OsiriX: an open-source software for navigating in multidimensional DICOM images.

Authors:  Antoine Rosset; Luca Spadola; Osman Ratib
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Mammographic breast density and the Gail model for breast cancer risk prediction in a screening population.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Elad Ziv; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.872

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in breast MRI.

Authors:  Beatriu Reig; Laura Heacock; Krzysztof J Geras; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Current Status and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Anke Meyer-Bäse; Lia Morra; Uwe Meyer-Bäse; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Volumetric breast density estimation on MRI using explainable deep learning regression.

Authors:  Bas H M van der Velden; Markus H A Janse; Max A A Ragusi; Claudette E Loo; Kenneth G A Gilhuijs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  SHIP-MR and Radiology: 12 Years of Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Single Center.

Authors:  Norbert Hosten; Robin Bülow; Henry Völzke; Martin Domin; Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Alexander Teumer; Till Ittermann; Matthias Nauck; Stephan Felix; Marcus Dörr; Marcello Ricardo Paulista Markus; Uwe Völker; Amro Daboul; Christian Schwahn; Birte Holtfreter; Torsten Mundt; Karl-Friedrich Krey; Stefan Kindler; Maria Mksoud; Stefanie Samietz; Reiner Biffar; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Thomas Kocher; Jean-Francois Chenot; Andreas Stahl; Frank Tost; Nele Friedrich; Stephanie Zylla; Anke Hannemann; Martin Lotze; Jens-Peter Kühn; Katrin Hegenscheid; Christian Rosenberg; Georgi Wassilew; Stefan Frenzel; Katharina Wittfeld; Hans J Grabe; Marie-Luise Kromrey
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  Development of U-Net Breast Density Segmentation Method for Fat-Sat MR Images Using Transfer Learning Based on Non-Fat-Sat Model.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Siwa Chan; Jeon-Hor Chen; Kai-Ting Chang; Chin-Yao Lin; Huay-Ben Pan; Wei-Ching Lin; Tiffany Kwong; Ritesh Parajuli; Rita S Mehta; Sou-Hsin Chien; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.